Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Reddington's Basketball Tips

Channel

Reddington's Basketball Tips

@mrreddingtonbasketballtips

Not marked by Telegram, checked 31 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

611subscribers

+59 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002237095934
TypeChannel
Username@mrreddingtonbasketballtips
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded30 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/mrreddingtonbasketballtips

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

55161158130 August 2026 — 552 subscribers30 August 2026 — 551 subscribers9 September 2026 — 567 subscribers18 September 2026 — 569 subscribers2 October 2026 — 591 subscribers11 October 2026 — 598 subscribers19 October 2026 — 611 subscribers30 August 202619 October 2026
7 measurements spanning 50 days, net +59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 542–620 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Oct 2026, 09:57611+13
11 Oct 2026, 20:20598+7
2 Oct 2026, 06:14591+22
18 Sept 2026, 06:37569+2
9 Sept 2026, 11:21567+16
30 Aug 2026, 12:35551-1
30 Aug 2026, 05:30552first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

206 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤18187.9%
👍2311.2%
🔥10.485%
🙈10.485%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 206 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC41 views3 reactionsread 30 August 2026

For Sunday games, I see some valuable options, but I won't bet on any of these games today. The one with probably the most value is Sweden vs France under 174.5 points. With Wembanyama, Gobert, and all the other players, France have excellent defense, and they are not playing in fast pace. I think Sweden will have hard time scoring. For me, this is 80-68 France type of a game. So 174.5 sounds unlogical. But we will …

❤3

30 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC37 views1 reactionsread 30 August 2026

So double instead of two singles was a bad call on Friday. ❌ If I was told that I would lose Montenegro bet, I would think that result would be like 72-56... This is crazy that Georgia scored 101 on them. For me looked in the 3rd quarter that will be a winner, but they shutted down in 4th. Bosnia won. ✅ Other games went in both direction. Iceland covered. I would say easily. It was 29 in the end, but it was only 9…

❤1

27 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC192 views16 reactionsread 30 August 2026

For tomorrow, I like two games. Georgia vs Montenegro -If you follow this channel long enough, you know there is no guarantees in betting. But for me, this is premium pick. Montenegro +10.5. Georgia have terrible qualifiers so far, but they improved things with a win over Spain. They are struggling with spacing a lot. Georgia have four elite players (Mamukelashvili, Bitadze, Shengelia and Reed). Rest of the team is…

❤16

27 Aug 2026, 23:10 UTC186 views7 reactionsread 30 August 2026

I would say readings were more than solid. Netherlands and Hungary were clear wins, without any trouble. ✅ Double was lost ❌ In the same time, I am surprised and not surprised with Israel performance. I am surprised because this was their last shot to stay alive, and had good starting five. And I am not surprised because they are sh*t for the entire qualifiers. Sweden indeed solid double pick to cover. And Africa…

❤7

26 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC216 views19 reactionsread 30 August 2026

FIBA qualifiers are back. So here is my preview of the games. I don't have any of six tomorrow's games like super great, but I think some have real value. Germany vs Netherlands -I don't think that line here is good. +29.5 is too many points. Yes, Germany is World Cup and Eurobasket champion, but they are missing some players. And I think bookies overlooked a fact that Netherlands have 4 out of 6 its best players …

❤19

7 Jul 2026, 02:30 UTC647 views21 reactionsread 30 August 2026

It wasn't smooth as silk, but all the readings and picks were correct. ✅ Bosnia covered +21 without losing more than 20 at any point. Jokic and Jovic played superb games, and Serbia showed their A-level performance, but line was indeed too high. ✅ Slovenia +11.5 & Hungary to win combo nailed as well. But Slovenia played terrible game. I thought it would be 50/50 game, but Larsson was unstoppable. Still +11.5 was so…

❤20🔥1

6 Jul 2026, 02:29 UTC544 views5 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Monday Games: Serbia vs Bosnia -If I need to pick one single to ride with today, it would be Bosnia +21. They played neck-to-neck game with Turkey that has all players in this window. Had Sipahi miss that 3-pointer with 90seconds to go, Bosnia would have a shot to win it. If we remove Jokic, Jovic and Avramovic, this Serbia roster is mostly ABA League level players. And Bosnia have 5-6 ABA League level players + NB…

❤5

6 Jul 2026, 02:08 UTC353 views2 reactionsread 30 August 2026

These FIBA Qualifiers are crazy as hell. -Lithuania ❌ They had 80-68 with four minutes to go, but they managed to blew it. Odds closed at 1.28, so 1.72 (in the moment I wrote here) were huge value. -Romania +8.5 & under 155.5 points was good SameGame combo. ✅ -Greece vs Portugal ended in under. ✅ But... 🙈🤣 How to explain this outcome? Portugal were blown away at home against crippled Montenegro side, and then thre…

❤2

4 Jul 2026, 02:27 UTC386 views8 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Sometimes, it works this way. I thought July 2nd games are better to bet on, but actually, I've nailed with July 3rd games readings. Basically, all the games went in (good) direction. Both Sweden & Estonia destroyed their opponents, so no surprises there. Finland also covered -6.5 although it was difficult in the end after having +14 with a couple of minutes to go. Netherlands covered everything against Latvia. Ger…

❤8

3 Jul 2026, 03:20 UTC299 views8 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Bottom line, I thought July 2nd feature better games to bet on than July 3rd, and I was ❌❌❌ so no big confidence in today games. But, Finland -6.5 should work wonders in double. Just to figure out what is the best pair to go with. Both Sweden & Estonia look good, but it's not unimaginable for Czech or Slovenia to pull off upset. Maybe Netherlands +13.5 at home is correct option to go with on double. But we'll see. …

❤8

3 Jul 2026, 03:20 UTC307 views5 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Huh, terrible outcomes on Thursday. I should stick to football until the World Cup is over considering how much money I've earned there so far (🥶). Joking aside, some really unexpected results. I am very surprised with Iceland outcome. I didn't watch the game, but very very surprised with the outcome. I doubt Georgia would turn things around in 2nd half, but Reed was ejected in 2nd quarter after scoring 18pts. With…

❤4👍1

2 Jul 2026, 03:20 UTC340 views13 reactionsread 30 August 2026

FIBA World Cup Qualifiers - July 2 I have one double I like a lot: Georgia +7.5 Iceland +8.5 In Serbian sportsbook MeridianBet, you can get 1.96 odds at the moment. So I'll start with these two games. Ukraine vs Georgia -Georgia need to win to stay alive. If they lose this one, it's almost certainly game over. Shengelia, Reed and Bitadze are available and that should be enough to play highly competitive game. It…

❤11👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mrreddingtonbasketballtips. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

TopStranger
@StrangerTop · 42,865
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Reddington's Basketball Tips” (@mrreddingtonbasketballtips), 611 subscribers as measured 19 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrreddingtonbasketballtips.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.