Channel
@mrreddingtonbasketballtips
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
551subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002237095934 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mrreddingtonbasketballtips |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mrreddingtonbasketballtips |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 551 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 552 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 June 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 672 |
| Reactions total | 46 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
206 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 181 | 87.9% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 11.2% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.485% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.485% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 206reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
For Sunday games, I see some valuable options, but I won't bet on any of these games today. The one with probably the most value is Sweden vs France under 174.5 points. With Wembanyama, Gobert, and all the other players, France have excellent defense, and they are not playing in fast pace. I think Sweden will have hard time scoring. For me, this is 80-68 France type of a game. So 174.5 sounds unlogical. But we will …
❤3
So double instead of two singles was a bad call on Friday. ❌ If I was told that I would lose Montenegro bet, I would think that result would be like 72-56... This is crazy that Georgia scored 101 on them. For me looked in the 3rd quarter that will be a winner, but they shutted down in 4th. Bosnia won. ✅ Other games went in both direction. Iceland covered. I would say easily. It was 29 in the end, but it was only 9…
❤1
For tomorrow, I like two games. Georgia vs Montenegro -If you follow this channel long enough, you know there is no guarantees in betting. But for me, this is premium pick. Montenegro +10.5. Georgia have terrible qualifiers so far, but they improved things with a win over Spain. They are struggling with spacing a lot. Georgia have four elite players (Mamukelashvili, Bitadze, Shengelia and Reed). Rest of the team is…
❤16
I would say readings were more than solid. Netherlands and Hungary were clear wins, without any trouble. ✅ Double was lost ❌ In the same time, I am surprised and not surprised with Israel performance. I am surprised because this was their last shot to stay alive, and had good starting five. And I am not surprised because they are sh*t for the entire qualifiers. Sweden indeed solid double pick to cover. And Africa…
❤7
FIBA qualifiers are back. So here is my preview of the games. I don't have any of six tomorrow's games like super great, but I think some have real value. Germany vs Netherlands -I don't think that line here is good. +29.5 is too many points. Yes, Germany is World Cup and Eurobasket champion, but they are missing some players. And I think bookies overlooked a fact that Netherlands have 4 out of 6 its best players …
❤19
It wasn't smooth as silk, but all the readings and picks were correct. ✅ Bosnia covered +21 without losing more than 20 at any point. Jokic and Jovic played superb games, and Serbia showed their A-level performance, but line was indeed too high. ✅ Slovenia +11.5 & Hungary to win combo nailed as well. But Slovenia played terrible game. I thought it would be 50/50 game, but Larsson was unstoppable. Still +11.5 was so…
❤20🔥1
Monday Games: Serbia vs Bosnia -If I need to pick one single to ride with today, it would be Bosnia +21. They played neck-to-neck game with Turkey that has all players in this window. Had Sipahi miss that 3-pointer with 90seconds to go, Bosnia would have a shot to win it. If we remove Jokic, Jovic and Avramovic, this Serbia roster is mostly ABA League level players. And Bosnia have 5-6 ABA League level players + NB…
❤5
These FIBA Qualifiers are crazy as hell. -Lithuania ❌ They had 80-68 with four minutes to go, but they managed to blew it. Odds closed at 1.28, so 1.72 (in the moment I wrote here) were huge value. -Romania +8.5 & under 155.5 points was good SameGame combo. ✅ -Greece vs Portugal ended in under. ✅ But... 🙈🤣 How to explain this outcome? Portugal were blown away at home against crippled Montenegro side, and then thre…
❤2
Sometimes, it works this way. I thought July 2nd games are better to bet on, but actually, I've nailed with July 3rd games readings. Basically, all the games went in (good) direction. Both Sweden & Estonia destroyed their opponents, so no surprises there. Finland also covered -6.5 although it was difficult in the end after having +14 with a couple of minutes to go. Netherlands covered everything against Latvia. Ger…
❤8
Bottom line, I thought July 2nd feature better games to bet on than July 3rd, and I was ❌❌❌ so no big confidence in today games. But, Finland -6.5 should work wonders in double. Just to figure out what is the best pair to go with. Both Sweden & Estonia look good, but it's not unimaginable for Czech or Slovenia to pull off upset. Maybe Netherlands +13.5 at home is correct option to go with on double. But we'll see. …
❤8
Huh, terrible outcomes on Thursday. I should stick to football until the World Cup is over considering how much money I've earned there so far (🥶). Joking aside, some really unexpected results. I am very surprised with Iceland outcome. I didn't watch the game, but very very surprised with the outcome. I doubt Georgia would turn things around in 2nd half, but Reed was ejected in 2nd quarter after scoring 18pts. With…
❤4👍1
FIBA World Cup Qualifiers - July 2 I have one double I like a lot: Georgia +7.5 Iceland +8.5 In Serbian sportsbook MeridianBet, you can get 1.96 odds at the moment. So I'll start with these two games. Ukraine vs Georgia -Georgia need to win to stay alive. If they lose this one, it's almost certainly game over. Shengelia, Reed and Bitadze are available and that should be enough to play highly competitive game. It…
❤11👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mrreddingtonbasketballtips. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Reddington's Basketball Tips” (@mrreddingtonbasketballtips), 551 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrreddingtonbasketballtips.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.