Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

МРММКД

@mrmmkd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,587subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001347706880
TypeChannel
Username@mrmmkd
Created22 April 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mrmmkd

Growth

1,5821,5871,584.56 August 2026 — 1,582 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,582 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,584 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,587 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,581–1,588 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:181,587+3
10 Aug 2026, 06:111,584+2
6 Aug 2026, 14:011,582no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:521,582first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.1%
avg views ÷ 1,587 subscribers
Avg views / post
605
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (22 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total12,714
Reactions total399
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

399 reactions across 21 posts, in 69 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5614.0%
custom 5248996587480298384328.02%
custom 5260475944140828711215.26%
custom 5280964673309518296184.51%
custom 5438117221727480540164.01%
custom 5215496727334762366153.76%
custom 5778404005961010148123.01%
custom 5197673179992038546102.51%
custom 5348383990430572087102.51%
custom 524016831226814277792.26%
custom 532379009716061866392.26%
custom 532597772586792870892.26%
custom 577379557906684689692.26%
custom 521119280073697745082.01%
custom 526272750343634533782.01%
custom 537987688537314211282.01%
custom 592276085037177692782.01%
custom 624458243632844384082.01%
custom 535513817439590713471.75%
custom 519535236864385577261.50%
49 further kinds12030.1%

Custom emoji. 19 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 399reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 21 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mrmmkd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC196 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Новиночки по пятницам Songlink//Bandcamp//RYM Единоличный проект гитариста техничных итальянских групп Vertebra Atlantis и Strigiform. Уже второй альбом от него в этом году, где он изучает грани авангардных черных шумов и пугающих звуков. МРММКД 🎧 #новиночки

custom 52401683122681427779custom 52853542973897621292👍1custom 53619487942314650621

6 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC275 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 53483076602717884043👍2custom 53440726335394035171custom 58506555521320918151

5 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC≈1,570 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 526047594414082871121custom 543811722172748054016custom 52627275034363453378👎2👍1custom 52626718664299899401

5 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC369 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Mudvayne - L.D. 50 Великий альбом и пик ню метала как жанра за счет действительно необычного сонграйтинга, шикарной техники басиста (бр бр денг) и давящей больничной атмосферы из фильмов ужасов, которая чувствуется через амбиентные вставки. Хотя мне нравится и два следующих альбома тоже, несмотря на заметное смягчение песен, этот полноформат уже никак не превзойти. Больше часа экстремальных эмоций и беспощадных риф

custom 528096467330951829618custom 58932663349925692006👍5custom 51976731799920385465custom 53348027970344827514👎1

4 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC407 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Финал

  1. Swans 🦢61%
  2. Red Hot Chili Peppers 🌶39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 52607472271601439002custom 53530801291468553412

4 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC401 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Привет Питер, привет всем, группа Contain Продолжаю беспринципно воровать релизы у почетных копателей глубин bandcamp. На это раз подрезал стрэйтедж металкор епишку у errorzone с жестким звуком по девяностым. Коротко и четко. МРММКД 🎧

👍5custom 60443686789447713443custom 52357436842044373222custom 53773677912486141222custom 53373222377352165941

3 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC431 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Корзина 2

  1. Foo Fighters6%
  2. Enter Shikari13%
  3. Swans24%
  4. The Sisters of Mercy9%
  5. Napalm Death16%
  6. Yellow Magic Orchestra8%
  7. Integrity5%
  8. Kunteynir19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 54610420219867373845custom 61881326632498646851

3 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC425 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Корзина 1

  1. Red Hot Chili Peppers22%
  2. Nick Cave & The Bad Seeds14%
  3. ヨルシカ (Yorushika)1%
  4. Amorphis14%
  5. Dead Can Dance16%
  6. Coil21%
  7. Unwound7%
  8. Gnaw Their Tongues6%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 54159752995170063641custom 61881326632498646851

3 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTC458 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

8stringsamurai слушает весь Cocteau Twins Ещё одна дискография пройдена. Сам удивился тому, сколько в итоге поставил девяток. Приятного чтения! В ближайшее время стримов не планируется, поэтому возвращаемся к старой схеме с обычным голосованием и выбором большинства без рандома. Наверное разумно будет чередовать эти два регламента для разнообразия. Жду ваши варианты для новых дискографий в комментариях, вечером за

custom 577840400596101014812👍9custom 54588687857148351684custom 53413384101141314392

2 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTC476 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пойдём в автоматы! Любопытный проект Arcade Ambience от человека по имени Andy Hofle. Он попытался воссоздать звуковую атмосферу помещений с игровыми автоматами, где одновременно воспроизводится куча звуков из разных игр, сливаясь в единый поток мелодий и звуковых эффектов. Изначально он хотел сделать такие подборки на каждый календарный год, но вышли только на 1981, 1983, 1986 и 1992 года. Списки игр, использованн

custom 53259777258679287089custom 58119232020493140244custom 52309785554284942412👍1

1 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC512 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Эстетика противоречия Через две недели, 15 августа состоится очень интересная лекция от Анастасии в Zoom формате с диалогом на стыке музыки и изобразительного искусства. Слушателей ожидает увлекательный рассказ о художественных особенностях творчества вокалиста Buck-Tick. Глубокого погружения в лор группы не требуется - понятно будет всем желающим. Будет объёмно и очень интересно. Все подробности в посте ниже. МР

custom 51953523686438557726custom 53976946130351735432👍1custom 53774313825344052561

31 Jul 2026, 06:01 UTC478 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Новиночки по пятницам Songlink//RYM Очередная милая епишка от молодых британских рокеров, симулирующих звук эры майспейса. Отличный баланс между мелодикой и качем. В коллекцию. МРММКД 🎧 #новиночки

custom 52111928007369774506custom 52829269536727462524👍3custom 52356026933130119052

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @mrmmkd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTCFinal Results179 voters

Финал

  1. Swans 🦢61%
  2. Red Hot Chili Peppers 🌶39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTCFinal Results181 voters

Корзина 2

  1. Foo Fighters6%
  2. Enter Shikari13%
  3. Swans24%
  4. The Sisters of Mercy9%
  5. Napalm Death16%
  6. Yellow Magic Orchestra8%
  7. Integrity5%
  8. Kunteynir19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTCFinal Results170 voters

Корзина 1

  1. Red Hot Chili Peppers22%
  2. Nick Cave & The Bad Seeds14%
  3. ヨルシカ (Yorushika)1%
  4. Amorphis14%
  5. Dead Can Dance16%
  6. Coil21%
  7. Unwound7%
  8. Gnaw Their Tongues6%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 108,145 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“МРММКД” (@mrmmkd), 1,587 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrmmkd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.