G fckn M 😌
👍1

Channel
@mrkingdicegambles
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001708502481 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mrkingdicegambles |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 16 January 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mrkingdicegambles |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 1 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 1 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
29 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 20 | 69.0% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 13.8% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 10.3% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 3.45% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 3.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2023 to 19 February 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
G fckn M 😌
👍1
Cute Bear Buy! 🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻🐺🐻 💵 0.444 BNB ($140.41) 🪙 3,192,073,694,584 CUTE 🪪 0x5608…0dc1 | Txn | Track ✅ New Holder 🔘 Market Cap $42,326 🏁 Biggest Buy
Slurped very well, hope u guys did that) Nice point for entry as well 🎲
CUTE BEAR 🐻 Dev’s prev project did well, so this one can do some solid X’s too. May be u should wait for better entry, such a huge green s t i c c rn. Current mc: 18k Poocoin chart 💩 NFA DYOR 🎲
👍1
Monthly recap: We have some really good plays at the beginning of this channel. NEZUMI - 10x (C L E A N) DEXBUILDER - 5x (if u slurped the dip, u will do like 10-13x🫡) MOETA BSC - 5x (tbh, they dropped bsc-version and will refund ur investments 1:5, but it’s 5x still🤭) And few 2x and more. I’ll try my best at that month, hope u guys will help me 🤝
Sorry for that silence, guys Busy week 🤷♂️ Next post - short monthly recap On hunt as well 👀 What u guys aping at these days?
QUEEN 🫅 BSC play around Travladd’s “king” hype. Chart looks good and community is pretty active. Let’s see how’s it goes. Current mc: 29k Poocoin chart 💩 NFA DYOR 🎲
👍1🔥1
Absolutely nothing to ape, fuck 😫
HAL9000 🤖 ETH play, launched less then a 2 days, community looks good and chart looks healthy. AI tokens sooo hyped rn, so take a look 👀. Bots account blacklisted, so 10% wallet will stay here forever, lol 🫡. Also vc in a ~2h, I guess some news incoming 🤫. Let’s see how’s it goes. Dextools chart 🛠️ NFA DYOR 🎲
🤩1
DEXBUILDER 🦾 This one looks like ready to explode. Interesting utility: “Dexbuilder is a tool that can easily create a professional decentralized exchange (Swap) for your crypto project with Dexbuilder Bot. You need to buy and burn Dexbuilder Token for this”. Such a great idea, isn’t it? PFP and Biggest Buy competitions is active as well Current mc: 27k Poocoin chart 💩 NFA DYOR 🎲
👍2❤1🔥1
GM, guys! I’m on hunt rn, but may be someone have a hidden gem? Feel free to shill it 👀
SOCIALBUILDER 💪 Project with interesting utility (all-in-one social media management tool for Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, and Telegram). Chart looks good, vc (about updates and marketing plans) in an hour and a half. Let’s see how’s it goes Current mc: 13k Poocoin chart 💩 NFA DYOR 🎲
❤2👍2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mrkingdicegambles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@mrkingdicegambles named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mr. King Dice ll Gambles and Degens” (@mrkingdicegambles), 1 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrkingdicegambles.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.