4 measurements spanning 14 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45–47 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 22:36
47
+1
15 Aug 2026, 02:55
46
+1
10 Aug 2026, 15:16
45
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:39
45
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 26 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
106.4%
avg views ÷ 47 subscribers
Avg views / post
50.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
30.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
18 (26 March 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
50
Reactions total
15
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
148 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
56
37.8%
🔥
47
31.8%
👍
31
20.9%
🏆
3
2.03%
❤🔥
2
1.35%
👏
2
1.35%
💯
2
1.35%
🙏
2
1.35%
🫡
2
1.35%
👎
1
0.676%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Похожие, но такие разные
TO BE USED TO ≠ USED TO
Их часто путают, поэтому давайте разберемся:
1️⃣I’m used to… = я привык к…
She’s used to cold winters — Она привыкла к холодным зимам.
I’m used to getting up early — Я привык рано вставать.
❗️ После be used to идёт существительное/местоимение или герундий (глагол с ing).
❌ I’m used to get up early.
✅ I’m used to getting up early.
2️⃣ I used to… = раньше делал,…
В недавнем опросе про самую сложную временную форму в английском победил Present Perfect.
Он действительно не такой простой, поэтому я приготовил 3 момента, которые помогут разобраться:
2️⃣Используй Present Perfect, когда действие началось в прошлом и продолжается до сих пор.
❗️ В русском это настоящее время, например "Я живу здесь 3 года" или "Я знаю Джека с тех пор, как нам было 7".
🔴I have lived here for three…
От этого поста так и веет ЖАРОЙ 🔥
Ведь ниже целых 1⃣0⃣ слов на эту тему. Так что включаем кондей и поехали.
🥵 Когда безумно жарко, говори:
🎀It's sweltering
🎀It's boiling (все будто кипит)
🎀I'm melting! (Я сейчас расплавлюсь!)
А сама волна жары называется логично heatwave:
We've got a heatwave here right now and we're all literally melting! It's driving us crazy.
🔥
🌡 3 похожих слова:
🎀humid — про воздух, к…
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Предлоги времени: IN, ON, AT или вообще ничего?⏲
Предлоги времени — камень преткновения для многих.
Но если понять логику, запоминать совсем немного.
Я открыл Фигму и сделал такой постер, чтобы все было в одном месте.
Сохраняй себе ⬇️
Пишите, какую грамматику еще хотелось бы иметь в компактном формате.
#cохраняй
Школа ≠ Свободный английский
Родители часто переживают, что ребенок "плохо" идет по школьной программе. Но кто сказал, что сама программа хорошая?
Школа дает кучу грамматики. Зачастую сложной, которую ребята пока не будут использовать.
⬇
Школа дает кучу лексики "не в тему". Ну какая экология и ядерная энергия в 6-м классе? 🤦♂️
⬇
Потом сразу же контрольная. Кто не понял — виноват сам. И галопом по Европам бежим дал…
Как использовать двойной союз "или...или" в английском?
Частая ошибка:
"He was OR black OR brown" ❌
Используй "either... or".
Примеры:
"He was either black or brown" ✔️
"Now it's either her or me, you have to choose"✔️
"He either didn't know about it or didn't care" ✔️
Читается этот EITHER вот так:
🇬🇧 ai - thuh
🇺🇸 ee - thr
💎 Бонус:
I don't like it too ❌
I don't like it either ✔️
Хочешь говорить на английском б…
Порядок слов ⚠️
Ошибки в порядке слов — частая ситуация.
❗️Основная причина: человек не думает на английском и переводит с русского.
3 момента, которые сразу бросаются в глаза:
2️⃣ Нет подлежащего
В русском мы спокойно говорим: «Пошла в магазин».
В английском так нельзя. Нужно обязательно сказать, кто совершает действие:
❌ Went to the store.
✅ I went to the store.
⸻
3️⃣ Пустота после глагола
❌ Yes, I like.
…
🌟Не учи списки слов
Тебя посещали мысли вроде «завтра выучу 50 новых слов» / «буду учить 5 новых слов каждый день»?
Все хотят увеличить словарный запас, но большинство делает это неправильно ❎
В нашем активном словарном запасе те слова, которые мы используем в речи. Остальное — либо в пассивном, либо удаляется.
Так что если ты не общаешься про экологию или архитектуру каждую неделю, учить 50 слов по этим темам не…
Хватить говорить “he or she” ✋
Часто слышу:
❌ If a person wants to succeed, he or she must work hard.
На самом деле, грамматической ошибки тут нет, но носители так не говорят — слишком громоздко.
Используй THEY. И нет, это никак не связано с западной повесткой.
Например:
😊 If a person wants to succeed, they must work hard.
⬇️
Вот тебе говорят:
I met my old friend yesterday.
Как узнать имя? Очень просто.
❌ Oh, …
Ошибки 🟰 Хорошо
А вот избегать их значит бежать против ветра. Верней бы сказал даже стоять на месте.
Ты не виноват(а), если боишься делать ошибки в английском, ведь в нас закладывают страх ошибиться со школьных времен. Я же, наоборот, всегда показываю своим студентам, что ошибаться не только не страшно, а даже очень полезно 👍
Ошибки — это основной механизм обучения. Если ты не ошибаешься, ты не выходишь за пределы…
🔥5💯2👍1👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mrgrayenglish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Английский | Mr. Gray” (@mrgrayenglish), 47 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrgrayenglish.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.