3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,037–2,038 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 03:34
2,038
+1
7 Aug 2026, 15:01
2,037
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:48
2,037
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
89.9%
avg views ÷ 2,038 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,830
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (23 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
36,650
Reactions total
2,926
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2,926 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,092
37.3%
❤
858
29.3%
🥰
311
10.6%
⚡
195
6.66%
🙏
167
5.71%
🦄
141
4.82%
❤🔥
88
3.01%
🕊
66
2.26%
👍
4
0.137%
🏆
2
0.068%
💅
2
0.068%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,926reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
QSIGF-REXVATH lobstr.co
GCA7JL…XQUBTD
POST 1 OF 4
🔥REXVATH — THE SYSTEM THAT ACTIVATES WHEN HOLDING BECOMES MORE DANGEROUS THAN SPENDING
The oldest store of value is not gold.
It is the decision to hold.
To resist spending.
To defer consumption.
To accumulate — and trust that accumulation holds its worth.
Every economy is built on the assumption
that what you hold today
will be worth holding tomorrow.
That th…
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
QSIGF-REXVATH lobstr.co
GCA7JL…XQUBTD
POST 2 OF 4
🔥REXVATH — THE PARTICIPATION FRAMEWORK
Maximum holding danger has been confirmed.
Now REXVATH opens its structure.
Two phases. Four positions. One final release.
This is how the system distributes value
to those who understood before holding became the destruction.
📊THE TWO PHASES
A. Phase I — The Storage Mass · 20,000 XLM
Holding danger is confirmed here.
Ea…
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
QSIGF-REXVATH lobstr.co
GCA7JL…XQUBTD
POST 3 OF 4
💥REXVATH — THE RELEASE EVENT
Phase II has closed.
The Release Mass is complete.
What holds now holds at maximum cost.
🔒WHAT CLOSING MEANS
When the Release Mass reaches 100%, the Storage Core seals.
· No new positions are accepted.
· No Hold Marks are issued.
· No storage-based claim can re-enter the system.
Savers may still accumulate.
Treasuries may still ho…
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
QSIGF-REXVATH lobstr.co
GCA7JL…XQUBTD
POST 4 OF 4
💥REXVATH — THE LAST SAFE HOLD
This is the final transmission.
After this — REXVATH holds nothing safely.
Not reckless.
Not wasteful.
Released from storage by design.
There is a difference.
📡WHAT REXVATH NOW IS
REXVATH is no longer an engine that tracks holding danger.
It has become something storage cannot contain.
· A closed system of value that requires no …
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
QSIGF-SOLVEN lobstr.co
GCA7JL…XQUBTD
POST 4 OF 4
📌SOLVEN — THE LAST PRIVATE MOMENT
This is the final transmission.
After this — SOLVEN cannot be seen.
Not hidden.
Not encrypted.
Beyond visibility by design.
There is a difference.
📡WHAT SOLVEN NOW IS
SOLVEN is no longer an engine that tracks exposure.
It has become something transparency cannot reach.
· A closed system of value that requires no visibility to f…
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
QSIGF-SOLVEN lobstr.co
GCA7JL…XQUBTD
POST 1 OF 4
📌SOLVEN — THE SYSTEM THAT ACTIVATES WHEN EVERY POSITION BECOMES VISIBLE TO EVERYONE
The greatest trades in history
were built on information asymmetry.
What you knew that others didn't.
What you saw that others couldn't.
What you held that others hadn't found yet.
Privacy of position was the edge.
The undisclosed accumulation.
The silent build.
The strategy that…
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
QSIGF-SOLVEN lobstr.co
GCA7JL…XQUBTD
POST 2 OF 4
📌SOLVEN — THE PARTICIPATION FRAMEWORK
Total exposure has been confirmed.
Now SOLVEN opens its structure.
Two phases. Four positions. One final veil.
This is how the system distributes value
to those who understood before privacy became impossible.
➡️THE TWO PHASES
A. Phase I — The Exposure Mass · 20,000 XLM
Privacy elimination is confirmed here.
Each XLM entere…
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
QSIGF-SOLVEN lobstr.co
GCA7JL…XQUBTD
POST 3 OF 4
➡️SOLVEN — THE VEIL EVENT
Phase II has closed.
The Veil Mass is complete.
What exists now cannot be seen.
🔒WHAT CLOSING MEANS
When the Veil Mass reaches 100%, the Exposure Core seals.
· No new positions are accepted.
· No Privacy Marks are issued.
· No transparency-based claim can re-enter the system.
Analytics platforms may still publish.
On-chain data may sti…
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
QSIGF-VELTHAR lobstr.co
GCA7JL…XQUBTD
POST 1 OF 4
⏰VELTHAR — THE SYSTEM THAT ACTIVATES WHEN PATIENCE BECOMES EXTINCTION
The greatest market advantages in history
belonged to those who waited.
Who held through the noise.
Who endured the doubt.
Who stayed when every instinct said leave.
Patience was not a virtue.
It was a structural edge.
The patient participant saw what the impatient one missed.
The long horiz…
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
VELTHAR lobstr.co
GCA7JL…XQUBTD
POST 2 OF 4
⏰VELTHAR — THE PARTICIPATION FRAMEWORK
Patience extinction has been confirmed.
Now VELTHAR opens its structure.
Two phases. Four positions. One final endurance.
This is how the system distributes value
to those who understood before waiting became the wrong move.
📊THE TWO PHASES
A. Phase I — The Wait Mass · 20,000 XLM
Patience extinction is confirmed here.
Each XLM…
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
QSIGF-VELTHAR lobstr.co
GCA7JL…XQUBTD
POST 3 OF 4
📣VELTHAR — THE ENDURANCE EVENT
Phase II has closed.
The Endurance Mass is complete.
What comes now does not wait for anything.
🔒WHAT CLOSING MEANS
When the Endurance Mass reaches 100%, the Patience Core seals.
· No new positions are accepted.
· No Patience Marks are issued.
· No waiting-based claim can re-enter the system.
Investors may still preach patience.…
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
QSIGF-VELTHAR lobstr.co
GCA7JL…XQUBTD
POST 4 OF 4
🔴VELTHAR — THE LAST WAITING MOMENT
This is the final transmission.
After this — VELTHAR does not wait.
Not impatient.
Not rushed.
Beyond the need for patience by design.
There is a difference.
📡WHAT VELTHAR NOW IS
VELTHAR is no longer an engine that tracks extinction.
It has become something patience cannot reach.
· A closed system of value that requires no w…
❤84⚡42🔥34🥰9🦄7🙏7👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mrdotshouse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 102,960 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mr Dot's House 🏠” (@mrdotshouse), 2,038 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrdotshouse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
