Channel
@mr_vladimirfedorov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,949subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002638259167 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mr_vladimirfedorov |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mr_vladimirfedorov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 1,949 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 1,952 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 1,953 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 1,953 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (26 June 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,249 |
| Reactions total | 46 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
75 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 38 | 50.7% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 17.3% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 17.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 10.7% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 4.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Профессии сейчас меняются быстрее, чем мы успеваем это осознать: то, что вчера было базовым навыком, сегодня делает нейросеть за пять минут, а то, что казалось незыблемым статусом, завтра может просто перестать кормить. Вопрос уже не «что мне делать» а «как вообще оставаться в игре, когда правила меняются на ходу» Как раз об этом новый подкаст с Ольгой Земляной, легендой интерьерного рынка, больше 20 лет в професси…
❤4
Творческие люди не умеют продавать. Или просто боятся? Когда нужно назвать цену клиенту, внутри что-то сжимается, знакомо? Недавно разбирал этот вопрос с одним из учеников на менторской сессии, и он честно признался: хочется быть с позиции “окей, я подумаю над вашим предложением”, а не с позиции просящего. И вот здесь, мне кажется, кроется настоящая причина, а вовсе не в том, что у творческих людей нет коммерческо…
👍4❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤5👍1
Владимир Федоров | Новая Форма pinned a photo
Привет! Рад всем новеньким. Место, где разбираемся, что на самом деле мешает вам зарабатывать больше, строить крепкие отношения и чувствовать опору внутри ➡️ Подробнее обо мне ⬇️ Полезные посты 📌Страх больших денег: почему мы соглашаемся на меньшее 📌 Вы узнаете, как достичь успеха всего за 60 секунд 📌Почему ты боишься поднять чек 📌 История Веры пришла с запросом “хочу выйти на новый уровень в бизнесе”. А мы коп…
❤5
Ещё одно направление, о котором давно хотел рассказать Друзья, за время ведения канала я много говорю про психологию, бизнес и мышление. Но у меня есть ещё одна сторона, о которой рассказываю редко, хотя именно она даёт мне практический опыт. У меня есть SCANDDYY — компания, которая занимается комплектацией проектов из Турции, Европы, Америки и Китая. И вот Китай — направление, о котором хочется рассказывать особе…
❤4👍4
Кто вы в своей профессии?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Художник или управленец: кто вы, прежде чем стать миллионером? Ко мне часто приходят с одним и тем же запросом: - хочу выйти на миллион, хочу масштабироваться, хочу зарабатывать в разы больше. И я всегда задаю встречный вопрос: - а кто вы в своей профессии? Большинство теряется, потому что вопрос звучит просто, а на деле упирается в то, о чём почти никто не задумывается всерьёз. Прежде чем говорить о цифрах, важн…
❤4🔥2👍1
Ты не боишься поднять цену, ты боишься, что тебя не выберут по этой цене Недавно в Питере на бизнес разборах разбирали вопрос, который на первый взгляд кажется бизнесовым, а на деле лежит ровно на стыке процессов и работы с головой. Одна из участниц призналась: «Понимаю, что пора поднимать чек, но не могу решиться» и добавила: «Цену я обычно назначаю от своего самоощущения, чувствую себя на шесть — беру шесть» …
👍3💯3🔥3
Друзья, Москва, привет! Соскучился. Живое общение — это всегда классно, ничем не заменить. 26 июля встречаемся на мероприятии DES AIR для дизайнеров от нашего партнёра — клуба комплектаторов. Реальность сейчас такая: дроны летают, бензин заканчивается, а жизнь продолжается, и люди не прекращают делать ремонты. И у каждого клиента один вопрос: где найти того, кто закроет максимум задач и точно не подведёт. Надёж…
❤3
Расстались с очередным подрядчиком? Прочитайте, прежде чем искать нового Часто, когда подрядчик работает не так, как хотелось бы, первая мысль: Мы нашли не того человека Но, как показывает практика, проблема чаще кроется не в специалисте, а в системе, которую мы сами выстраиваем. Мы не договариваемся на берегу, за что платим деньги, а потом месяц молча копим раздражение и вопросы, откладывая их на потом. Хотя пр…
❤4🔥4
На выходных зашёл в Planta Rosa, у ребят небольшое кафе внутри магазина. Открываю меню, воды нет. Спрашиваю, где купить: - Она у нас бесплатная, — говорят, и приносят целую бутылку, не стакан. Посидел час на улице, почитал книгу, захотел ещё. Вернулся, говорю: - Тогда куплю ещё одну. А мне отвечают: - Мы её не продаём, возьмите так. И вот в такие моменты понимаешь: коммуникация строится не рекламой, она строится …
❤🔥8🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @mr_vladimirfedorov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто вы в своей профессии?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 329,441 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Владимир Федоров | Новая Форма” (@mr_vladimirfedorov), 1,949 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mr_vladimirfedorov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.