Video message, posted without a caption
❤4

Channel
@mozhnovse_nlp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
156subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002547938197 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mozhnovse_nlp |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mozhnovse_nlp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:00 | 156 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:23 | 155 | no change |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 155 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 153 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 154 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 151 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 2 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (2 September 2026 – 6 September 2026) |
| Views total | 330 |
| Reactions total | 40 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 09:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
40 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 50.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 12.5% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 12.5% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 10.0% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 7.50% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 5.00% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4
Родные ❤️ Не теряйте. Учусь жизни у Гаррика :) Как у вас?🫶🏻
😍4🥰3🙏3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤1💘1🥰1
И вот первая, не большая, но на мой взгляд полезная информация про цвета 🎨 Она расширит ваше представление с детства о том, что цветов только 7😅 Помните, «Каждый охотник желает знать…» )) И я уверена, она не оставит никого равнодушным, так как названия некоторым оттенкам лично я сама первый раз узнала именно из неё 🤓 Например, канареечный 💛 календула 🧡 папоротник 💚 А какие ваши любимые оттенки?😍 #красота #ст…
❤🔥3
Родные, привет ❤️ Помните тот опрос? Так вот — я ДА 🫶🏻 Во-первых, спасибо за отклик и ваше время. Это ценно 🙏🏻 Во-вторых — за то, что разделяете мою любовь к многогранности, многозадачности и красоте 🥰 Отдельная благодарность тем, кто проголосовал за то, чтобы здесь всё оставалось как есть. Я искренне признательна вам за постоянство и вдумчивость. Обещаю: спамить красотой не буду. Красота — часть меня. И всё,…
❤4
А это то, что осталось у меня после расстановки.. Честно, даже не помню, в какой её момент начала рисовать и в какой закончила. Есть тут асы в нейрографике? Это она или просто мои каракули?😅
❤3❤🔥1
Сходила в расстановку. Замом не стала, но ощущение — будто прожила маленькую жизнь. Свою. Те же мысли. Те же переживания. Одна боль. Мы не в силах изменить прошлое. Но способны его признать. Мы не вправе изменить будущее. Но можем его создать. Когда мы маленькие, мы уверены: нам под силу изменить мир. Сделать его лучше, чем есть. Счастливее. Правильнее. Добрее. И тогда берём на себя слишком много. Непосильно мно…
❤3❤🔥1
Вчера был многогранный день. Яркий. Быстрый. Насыщенный внешне. И при этом — бесконечный внутри. И знаете, чем хочется поделиться? С утра я почувствовала, что с плеч ушла тяжесть. При этом я отдаю себе отчёт: прямо сейчас передо мной стоят вопросы, требующие срочных и важных решений. Например: - финансы — где и в какой сфере я буду их добывать; - организация быта, включая школу в новой реальности; - моя планир…
❤5💘1🔥1🥰1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @mozhnovse_nlp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ОЛЬГА СИВОКОНЬ | МОЖНО ВСЁ” (@mozhnovse_nlp), 156 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mozhnovse_nlp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.