Channel
موفقیت به سبک دیوانگان
@movafaghiatpakzat
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,008subscribers
-46 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001721290320 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @movafaghiatpakzat |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 20 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/movafaghiatpakzat |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 21:51 | 3,008 | -1 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 17:20 | 3,009 | -1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:39 | 3,010 | +1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 21:40 | 3,009 | -1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 05:19 | 3,010 | -1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 3,011 | -7 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:55 | 3,018 | -2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 12:48 | 3,020 | -1 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 19:25 | 3,021 | -10 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 12:17 | 3,031 | -13 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 3,044 | +2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 3,042 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:35 | 3,045 | no change |
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 3,045 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 3,043 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 3,044 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:51 | 3,046 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 3,049 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 3,053 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:21 | 3,054 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@farshidpakzat_nlp · 21,620
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 September 2026
@mohamadamin_bavandpour · 28,848
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 7 September 2026
@darmasireservatt · 26,861
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 12 September 2026
@arsaalanasadi7 · 45,594
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
@JoyaKarVancouver · 18,952
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 October 2026
@mohammadbasiri · 146,020
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
@basiri7 · 91,944
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
@akhtarmar · 24,613
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
@abasmanesh_com · 49,419
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“موفقیت به سبک دیوانگان” (@movafaghiatpakzat), 3,008 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/movafaghiatpakzat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.