4 measurements spanning 20 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 274–281 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 18:46
280
+4
21 Aug 2026, 07:28
276
+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:46
275
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:17
275
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.88%
avg views ÷ 280 subscribers
Avg views / post
27.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
12 (20 June 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
83
Reactions total
9
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
92 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5429277624981538430
39
42.4%
🔥
27
29.3%
custom 5283082792266132849
12
13.0%
custom 5463192898658920696
7
7.61%
custom 5283110920006954023
5
5.43%
custom 5278328886239725434
2
2.17%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @moussemuse. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Новое видео про мини-корпусные десерты уже вышло, а значит пора решать, что мы будем готовить дальше 🙏
И здесь я решила не выбирать тему сама — хочу доверить это вам! 🙏
❓ Какой десерт вы бы с удовольствием увидели в следующем видео?
Мне правда интересно, какой вариант победит — возможно, именно он станет темой следующего выпуска 🤩
целый месяц кропотливой работы и вот — новое видео о корпусных пирожных наконец здесь! если честно, я в восторге от результата.
этот выпуск получился настоящим кладезем полезной информации по работе с корпусными.
в нем я:
🤎 в деталях показываю, как добиться того самого идеального, тончайшего и звонко хрустящего шоколадного корпуса,
🥭 наглядно сравниваю текстуры фруктовых начинок. вы своими глазами увидите разницу…
🤩 Совсем скоро выложу новое видео на YouTube и ВК — в этот раз готовим мини-корпусные десерты!
Будем собирать целый набор ярких пирожных в формате «на один укус»:
🍉 арбуз
🥥 кокос
🍋 маракуйя
В видео вас ждёт набор техкарт на все десерты и подробный процесс приготовления.
📎 Самое приятное — для набора нужна всего одна форма! То есть форма одна, а вариантов использования сразу несколько. Все техкарты уже пересчитан…
Корпусное пирожное мини-манго
🍯 1. Манговый гель (начинка):
Пюре манго — 90 г
Сахар — 11 г
Агар-агар — 0.7 г
Свежее манго (кубик) — ~30 г
🤩 2. Взбитый манговый ганаш:
Пюре манго — 48 г |
Белый шоколад — 115 г
Сливки (33%) — 132 г (горячие) + 180 г (холодные)
Желатин — 1.6 г
Вода для желатина – 8 грамм
Сироп глюкозы — 10 г
Ваниль — 4 г
❤️ 3. Сборка и глазурь:
Белый шоколад — 120 г
Какао-масло — 100 г
Краситель жиро…
На днях мы с вами обсуждали, в чем мини-корпусные пирожные выигрывают у своих классических братьев. Пора переходить от теории к практике! 🥭🌟
Я решила не просто делиться эстетикой «английского чаепития» и своими экспериментами, но и передать вам полноценную рабочую технологию ❤️
🤩 Уже в следующем посте отдам одну из подробных техкарт моего сборника корпусных десертов — мини-манго!
В рецепте разберем по шагам:
🍑 Ка…
😮 Они сейчас буквально везде…
🤩 Корпусные десерты заполонили ленты соцсетей, и пройти мимо этого тренда просто невозможно.
Я тоже не смогла остаться в стороне.
Более того — мы уже заканчиваем монтаж большого видео на YouTube, где я подробно покажу, как создаю такие десерты: от работы с формами до сборки и декора 🎀
Но мне не хотелось просто повторить за другими. Когда смотрю на витрину с идеальными корпусными десе…
⚪️ у убе-пудры очень тонкий, деликатный вкус — что-то между сливочной ванилью и печеным орешком. чтобы его не потерять в десерте, пару нужно подбирать осторожно.
⚪️сохраняйте эти беспроигрышные сочетания, чтобы первые эксперименты с убе сразу попали клиентам в самое сердечко
Дорогие, привет! 🤍
На днях у нас вышло новое видео по знакомству с убе. В нем показала, как оригинально его обыгрывают в десертах популярные кофейни на Филиппинах.
Но одно дело вдохновляться зарубежной эстетикой, а другое перенести ее на свою домашнюю кухню 🥣
И пусть свежий убе у нас днем с огнем не сыщешь. Нам это и не нужно!
🤩 Наш главный помощник — порошок убе. Это тот же натуральный ямс, который без проблем м…
Пока все обсуждают корпусные пирожные и дубайский шоколад, индустрия уже двинулась дальше 👉
И, кажется, следующим большим трендом станет...
Убе. Новая «матча кондитерского мира» ⭐️
Именно поэтому я отправилась на Филиппины — разобраться, как обычный местный корнеплод превратился в мировой гастрономический тренд.
🎥 В новом выпуске показываю:
— почему все путают таро и убе;
— как кофейни продают фиолетовый латте в н…
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @moussemuse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 639,077 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mousse & Muse / Обучение кондитеров. Премиальные десерты. Рецепты” (@moussemuse), 280 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moussemuse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.