Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𓈒 ˑ 𐔌 𐌌𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚝⩜𝚒𝚗𝚜 ꫝ𝚘𝚞𝚜𝚎 ꒱ ۫

Channel

𓈒 ˑ 𐔌 𐌌𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚝⩜𝚒𝚗𝚜 ꫝ𝚘𝚞𝚜𝚎 ꒱ ۫

@mountainhouse10

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

54subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 13 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003350798058
TypeChannel
Username@mountainhouse10
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 October 2026
Last confirmed live22 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/mountainhouse10

Growth

545554.513 October 2026 — 55 subscribers13 October 2026 — 55 subscribers22 October 2026 — 54 subscribers13 October 202622 October 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54–55 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Oct 2026, 08:3754-1
13 Oct 2026, 15:2255no change
13 Oct 2026, 14:4755first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
107.9%
avg views ÷ 54 subscribers
Avg views / post
58.3
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 October 2026
Posts held20 (21 September 2026 – 11 October 2026)
Views total932
Reactions total82
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Oct 2026, 15:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

96 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52963261392397557104041.7%
custom 52944327286771084942121.9%
custom 52919368802317374221616.7%
custom 54363855295684456081010.4%
custom 523357820034851900344.17%
🗿33.13%
custom 538229503356518225422.08%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2026 to 11 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mountainhouse10. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 September 2026 to 11 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Oct 2026, 05:37 UTC22 views5 reactionsread 13 October 2026

🥳 🌩🌩🌩🌩🌩 🌩 🌩 🌩🤩 ! у нашей участницы @erA_2r2r сегодня день рождения 🩰 🤩давайте дружненько поздравим ее в комментариях ¡ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

custom 52963261392397557104custom 52919368802317374221

6 Oct 2026, 15:51 UTC63 views8 reactionsread 13 October 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52963261392397557106custom 52944327286771084941custom 53822950335651822541

5 Oct 2026, 14:16 UTC58 views3 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠😎 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 5⃣.1⃣0⃣🅰️1⃣0⃣.1⃣0⃣ 🔤ест: 8⃣🅰️🌟🌟 🌟 🎀нкетница 🥹 @anketsmonkey 🥹 🥹 Ждем именно вас 🥹

custom 52335782003485190033

3 Oct 2026, 12:11 UTC45 views2 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Forwarded from @thehousedolinaedinorogPhoto

🌟🌟🌟🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🌟🌟🌟 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Набор открыт!! Ждем ваших анкеточек!! Мест: 10 Конец набора: 13 октября 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Анкетница 🌄🌄🌄🌄 🌄🌄🌄🌄🌄🌄🌄🌄🌄 Просим союзников впшнуть наш пост о наборе!! #набор

custom 52944327286771084941custom 52963261392397557101

28 Sept 2026, 15:29 UTC84 views10 reactionsread 13 October 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52944327286771084947custom 52963261392397557102custom 52919368802317374221

27 Sept 2026, 10:52 UTC80 views9 reactionsread 13 October 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52963261392397557106custom 52919368802317374223

27 Sept 2026, 09:02 UTC64 views6 reactionsread 13 October 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52919368802317374224custom 52963261392397557101custom 53822950335651822541

27 Sept 2026, 08:50 UTC59 views5 reactionsread 13 October 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52944327286771084944custom 52919368802317374221

26 Sept 2026, 16:12 UTC58 views6 reactionsread 13 October 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52963261392397557104custom 54363855295684456082

26 Sept 2026, 12:36 UTC26 views3 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Forwarded from @monkeyhousegachaPhoto

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🦹 🥹🥹Мстители 🥹🥹🦹 🦹🦹🦹 • Мест: 1️⃣5️⃣🦹 • Конец набора: 3️⃣ октября 🦹 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🥹🥹Анкетница 🥹🥹 🥹 @anketsmonkey 🦹 #набор 🦹

🗿3

26 Sept 2026, 05:31 UTC61 viewsread 13 October 2026
Poll

Кого же найдем сегодня?? ?

  1. Помело, лимон62%
  2. Ежевика, голубика38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Sept 2026, 15:56 UTC67 views8 reactionsread 13 October 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52963261392397557104custom 52919368802317374222custom 54363855295684456082

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mountainhouse10. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Sept 2026, 05:31 UTCFinal Results13 voters

Кого же найдем сегодня?? ?

  1. Помело, лимон62%
  2. Ежевика, голубика38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Sept 2026, 05:39 UTCFinal Results17 voters

Кого мы найдем ещё??

  1. Ежевика, голубика41%
  2. Карамбола, белая клубника53%
  3. Помело, лимон24%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Sept 2026, 15:22 UTCFinal Results8 voters

Второе голосование!

  1. Драгон фрукт, лайм50%
  2. Ежевика, голубика25%
  3. Помело, лимон13%
  4. Карамбола, белая клубника25%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Sept 2026, 03:29 UTCFinal Results12 voters

Кого мы найдем сегодня??

  1. Помело, лимон25%
  2. Карамбола, белая клубника17%
  3. Лесные ягоды33%
  4. Ежевика, голубика25%
  5. Драгон фрукт, лайм25%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2026 to 11 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𓈒 ˑ 𐔌 𐌌𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚝⩜𝚒𝚗𝚜 ꫝ𝚘𝚞𝚜𝚎 ꒱ ۫” (@mountainhouse10), 54 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mountainhouse10.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.