Channel
@motorsportg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,234subscribers
+41 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002049451076 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @motorsportg |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/motorsportg |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 2,234 | +21 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:42 | 2,213 | +3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 2,210 | -4 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 14:57 | 2,214 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:03 | 2,213 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 2,215 | +7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 2,208 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 2,206 | +7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 2,199 | +9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 2,190 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 2,192 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 2,197 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:41 | 2,194 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 2,193 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
239 reactions across 21 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 73 | 30.5% | |
| ❤ | 55 | 23.0% | |
| 🔥 | 37 | 15.5% | |
| 😭 | 22 | 9.21% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 5.02% | |
| 🗿 | 6 | 2.51% | |
| 😍 | 6 | 2.51% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 2.51% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 2.09% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 1.67% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.26% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 1.26% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.26% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.837% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.418% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.418% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 239 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇮🇹 Kimi Antonelli has responded to the speculation surrounding his chances of becoming the 2026 Formula 1 World Champion. “I try not to think about the championship at all. I’m quite superstitious and I don’t like being called the main title contender. In motorsport, you can’t look that far ahead, so I prefer to focus on each race individually. I simply enjoy racing and winning — that’s the only thing I’m thinking ab…
👍6❤3❤🔥2
🇬🇧 McLaren has created a dedicated power unit performance team in response to Formula 1’s new technical regulations. The group works alongside Mercedes HPP, using track data, simulations and McLaren’s own tools to adapt the power unit’s operation to the specific demands of the MCL40. “We have a power unit performance team now, which we didn't have before. … We’re ultimately just not the ones in complete control.” —…
❤6👍3🔥1
🇦🇹 Toto Wolff reflected on Mercedes’ first half of the 2026 season and outlined the team’s priorities for the second part of the championship. “We started the season very strongly, and that was the result of a huge amount of work on both the power unit and the chassis. It allowed us to achieve strong results and put ourselves in a very competitive position. But reliability has hurt us. We had several retirements tha…
❤6👍6
🇳🇱🇳🇱 Max Verstappen was the driving force behind Zandvoort’s return to the Formula 1 calendar in 2021, according to Bernie Ecclestone(former Formula 1 chief). “The real reason is Max. Without Max, it would not have happened. Many things can make an event special, but Max makes this race special because he is quite special himself.” @motorsportg
❤7👏2👍1🤔1🥰1
🇬🇧 Arvid Lindblad’s instinct may have helped Liam Lawson secure P8 in Hungary. “I just had that feeling. We saw degradation already in FP1, and it was 20 degrees hotter for the race. These tyres don’t like the heat — Barcelona and Red Bull Ring already proved that.” 🇮🇹 Racing Bulls planned a one-stop race, but Lindblad was convinced two stops would be the better option. After Nico Hulkenberg switched to a two-stop s…
🥰5❤2👍2🔥2
🏎 More voices have joined the debate over the Oscar Piastri–Carlos Sainz collision, with Ralf Schumacher and James Vowles offering strong opinions on the incident. Ralf Schumacher was far from impressed with Sainz’s actions: “This is simply outrageous. It is unacceptable, and a normal penalty is not enough here. Sainz should be given a qualifying penalty in Zandvoort, otherwise it would set a precedent.” 🇬🇧 William…
🔥5🤣5❤1
🇦🇹 Toto Wolff has made it clear that Mercedes will not tolerate a repeat of the destructive rivalry between Lewis Hamilton and Nico Rosberg, which defined the 2014–2016 seasons. “I will not allow it. That’s never going to happen to me again. That’s never going to happen to the team again. Simple.” The Mercedes team principal added that any driver who allowed an internal battle to cross that line would be removed fr…
🔥6🤡6❤1👍1
🇲🇨 Charles Leclerc admits the team must understand why its performance continues to fluctuate so dramatically from one circuit to another. “It was a disappointing weekend. What stands out most is that we won and finished second at the two circuits where we expected to struggle, yet at the track where we thought we would be strong, we ended up fourth and fifth. Both cars seem to follow the same pattern: we are compet…
👍4😭3❤2👎1
The first comments from Carlos Sainz and Oscar Piastri following their collision at the Hungarian Grand Prix: 🇪🇸 Carlos Sainz: “I wasn’t told that Piastri was behind me. I feel sorry for him. We could have handled it better. I’m leaving with a very unpleasant feeling. The first half of the season has been extremely disappointing.” 🇦🇺 Oscar Piastri: Journalist: “Carlos said he wasn’t shown the blue flags on his stee…
🔥6🗿3👍2
Lando Norris, Max Verstappen and Kimi Antonelli after the 2026 Hungarian Grand Prix 🇬🇧 Lando Norris: “I’m tired. What happened? I don’t know, honestly. I just kept losing the rear and had a few snaps, so it was nearly game over on the opening lap. “I was pushing like hell to force Oscar into a mistake. My pace today was some of the best I’ve ever had. It was so strong that I could keep extending every stint. “I’m ju…
❤5🗿3👍2🔥1
🇳🇱 Max Verstappen did not hide his frustration after a disastrous Hungarian Grand Prix qualifying session, during which the RB22 progressively lost downforce and became increasingly unstable. The whole qualifying session was bad for me. It is absolutely useless,” Verstappen said, explaining that the aerodynamic problems had started between FP3 and qualifying. According to Max, Red Bull is facing a different issue ev…
👍5❤1🕊1
🇹🇭 Alex Albon is already wary of Aston Martin’s upgraded car: “Aston Martin have made a major step forward. They will probably be quicker than us through many of the corners, even though we are faster on the straights. That makes them, without question, the team we need to beat in qualifying this weekend. I haven’t seen their long-run pace, but if the car is this strong through the corners, I expect it to be good. Ge…
👍6🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @motorsportg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Motorsport 🏁” (@motorsportg), 2,234 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/motorsportg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.