Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Михаил Свяжин. Про SEO, сайты, арбитраж и маркетинг

@mosvyazhin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,773subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001318067814
TypeChannel
Username@mosvyazhin
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mosvyazhin

Growth

1,7691,7741,771.57 August 2026 — 1,774 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,773 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,769 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,773 subscribers1,7737 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,768–1,775 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 04:081,773+4
10 Aug 2026, 22:481,769-4
8 Aug 2026, 03:181,773-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:011,774first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 24 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.6%
avg views ÷ 1,773 subscribers
Avg views / post
242
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held11 (24 March 202630 July 2026)
Views total242
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

76 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍌2330.3%
🌭1823.7%
🔥1317.1%
🫡1114.5%
45.26%
💯33.95%
🦄33.95%
❤‍🔥11.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 11 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mosvyazhin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 March 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 09:39 UTC242 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нормально. В GSC теперь каким то образом можно добавлять свои площадки, и чекать видимость(скорее всего). Пока не добавлял, посмотрю на днях

🌭2❤‍🔥1

22 Jun 2026, 17:35 UTC565 views8 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @v_top10Photo

Всё. Дата есть. Локация есть. Осталось попасть. 📅 10 октября 2026 года. Москва. 🏢 Официальная часть — Башня Федерация Восток, 90 этаж. 🍾 Локацию фуршета пока не спойлерю — но будет достойно. Кто за столами На данный момент договорились с 12 экспертами, жду ответ ещё от двух. Большинство знаю лично — знаю их результаты. Им есть что рассказать. Без воды, без продаж курсов. Плюс — приглашены ребята, которые не хотят бы

3🔥3💯2

15 Jun 2026, 12:14 UTC525 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Госуслуги начали рекламировать ставки — народ заметил, что некоторые ссылки сервиса направляют пользователей прямо к букмекеру Вероятнее всего, там забыли продлить аренду сторонних доменов и их перехватили конторы. Вместо грантовой поддержки пользователи теперь получают предложения о фрибетах.

🦄3🍌2

25 May 2026, 13:28 UTC593 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sapeseoteamPhoto

Рынок ссылок в 2026 году: основные игроки, распределение бюджетов и актуальные стратегии Делимся новым исследованием Анализ охватывает реальные действия более 21 000 SEO-специалистов, работающих с 49 000 проектами в Sape. Ключевые данные и инсайты: ✨ Стоимость ссылок выросла на 35% — рынок смещается к качеству За год количество заказов на размещение ссылок сократилось на 5%, однако совокупные бюджеты выросли на

🌭3🔥1

18 May 2026, 13:20 UTC644 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥5🍌3🌭1💯1

18 May 2026, 13:19 UTC≈1,530 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кейс накрутки ПФ в Google Я писал про накрутку тут В начале мая обратился к ребятам, выбрал тариф 250 баксов. Серая ниша, Москва. Частотка скорее СК. Изначально позиции по всем 50 запросам(главная страница) в ТОП10 Google(что-то в ТОП5). Цель - дотянуть до ТОП1-3 В момент накрутки все вылетает из ТОПА(Скрин1). Пишу ребятам, они скидывают стату со своего сервиса, где все растёт(Скрин2), думаю, мб у меня какой то б

🌭2

27 Apr 2026, 17:09 UTC795 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я вижу такое впервые Дано: 1. Одна и та же GSC 2. 2 домена, 2 одинаковых сайта 3. Перенес сайт на домен 2, с домена 1(почти полная копия) 4. С домена 1 сайт не удалял 5. Канониклы стоят — только ОТНОСИТЕЛЬНЫЕ пути 6. Нигде нет ссылок с домена 2 на домен 1 Кто тут сявошник и мне объяснит что тут происходит?

🌭2

1 Apr 2026, 10:59 UTC≈1,080 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

❗️ This message is not supported in your version of Telegram. Please install the national messenger MAX

🍌14🫡10🌭51

24 Mar 2026, 17:18 UTC≈1,200 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ехал Тоха через лохов В реке лохов видит Тоху Сунул Тоха в Тоху желудь Маркин-Шишкин-Шишкин-Маркин Все персонажи вымышлены, кроме Антонов, сующим себе друг другу желудь Почему то такое ощущение что я это спиздил, или что-то подобное было в каком то канале😢

🍌4🔥4🌭2🫡1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @mosvyazhin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,299,631 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Михаил Свяжин. Про SEO, сайты, арбитраж и маркетинг” (@mosvyazhin), 1,773 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mosvyazhin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.