Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Пульс Москвы

@mospulse

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

154,854subscribers

-271 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001728202783
TypeChannel
Username@mospulse
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mospulse

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

154,854155,125154,989.57 August 2026 — 155,125 subscribers7 August 2026 — 155,125 subscribers7 August 2026 — 155,113 subscribers8 August 2026 — 155,047 subscribers9 August 2026 — 155,007 subscribers10 August 2026 — 154,969 subscribers11 August 2026 — 154,918 subscribers12 August 2026 — 154,854 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 5 days, net -271. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 154,813–155,166 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:55154,854-64
11 Aug 2026, 18:16154,918-51
10 Aug 2026, 16:11154,969-38
9 Aug 2026, 16:02155,007-40
8 Aug 2026, 18:33155,047-66
7 Aug 2026, 21:20155,113-12
7 Aug 2026, 17:45155,125no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:37155,125first reading

Engagement

70 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.56%
avg views ÷ 154,854 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,610
70 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
70
of 70 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held70 (6 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total602,451
Reactions total8,392
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14m 27s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,392 reactions across 70 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣2,30127.4%
1,86322.2%
🤯1,05312.5%
😱84610.1%
👍8219.78%
🔥5516.57%
custom 53864560923708294443404.05%
🗿2983.55%
🥰1832.18%
💯1101.31%
👏260.31%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,392reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC551 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🐈 Россияне делятся фотками солнечного затмения. Максимальный пик ожидается в 20:59. Также за час до рассвета на небе можно будет увидеть сразу 6 планет: от Марса до Нептуна. Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

8

12 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC≈2,730 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🐈 В интернетах завирусились заколки в виде семечек Интересно, как долго с такими можно будет пройтись по улице и не привлечь санитаров голубей? Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

🤣374🔥1🤯1

12 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC≈4,710 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026

😑 Ну бывает: москвичка укатила в отпуск и оставила свой «Лексус» во дворе, а его оперативно перепродали. 43-летний «автоэнтузиаст» приметил, что машина давно стоит во дворе без движения, состряпал поддельные документы, вызвал эвакуатор и отвез в Тверь, где продал скупщикам за 3 млн рублей. Умника быстро вычислили и поймали, а авто вернули владелице. Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

custom 538645609237082944439🔥131

12 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC≈5,320 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🐈 В Насадкинском лесу в Подмосковье кто-то креативно подошел к вопросу пугал. Зачем, для чего и почему именно такие наряды — тайна за семью печатями. Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

🔥32🤣186😱1

12 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC≈6,180 views104 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😐 В Химках на охоту вышел Декстер Морган от мира акул Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

🤣94😱64

12 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC≈6,890 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤷‍♂️ Рижский рынок продолжает работу — сносят здание в 300 метрах и оно не имеет к нему никакого отношения. Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

🤣329👍4😱2custom 53864560923708294441

12 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC≈6,790 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

😱 Приложение Ozon Банк снесли из Google Play Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

👍19😱162🤣2

12 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC≈7,670 views84 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🐈 Возле «Рижской» начали сносить цветочный рынок. На его месте построят пересадочную станцию ВСМ для поездов между Москвой и Питером. Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

😱36👍34🗿84custom 53864560923708294442

12 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC≈7,760 views69 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🤷‍♂️ В Зеленограде 26-летний fuckир на велосипеде бросил зажигательную смесь прямо на проезжую часть. Вскоре он был задержан. Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

😱55🗿93👍2

12 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC≈8,020 views129 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Новой фобии вам подкинем 🙂‍↔️ Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

😱100🗿19🤯10

12 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC≈8,240 views93 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Доброе утро, дорогие читатели💗 Сегодня +17...+19 градусов, дожди. Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

62👍24🤣5😱2

11 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC≈9,180 views99 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🐈 Ценники на хоромы в Москве продолжают удивлять. Как вам просторные 12 квадратов за 7 миллионов? Ⓜ️ Пульс Москвы

🤯7514👍10

Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @mospulse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 726,388 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пульс Москвы” (@mospulse), 154,854 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mospulse.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.