Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Моряк Арбитражник

Channel

Моряк Арбитражник

@moryak_arbitrazhnik

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

764subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003526116296
TypeChannel
Username@moryak_arbitrazhnik
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/moryak_arbitrazhnik

Growth

764777770.56 August 2026 — 775 subscribers6 August 2026 — 775 subscribers7 August 2026 — 777 subscribers15 August 2026 — 764 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 762–779 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 10:27764-13
7 Aug 2026, 12:15777+2
6 Aug 2026, 16:35775no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:17775first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.6%
avg views ÷ 764 subscribers
Avg views / post
318
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (13 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total4,764
Reactions total176
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

230 reactions across 20 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5624.3%
4117.8%
😁2711.7%
❤‍🔥229.57%
👏114.78%
🌚93.91%
🤩93.91%
🐳73.04%
👨‍💻73.04%
🤝62.61%
52.17%
😍52.17%
💅41.74%
😢41.74%
🤣41.74%
🔥31.30%
🎉20.87%
👀20.87%
🕊20.87%
😎20.87%
2 further kinds20.87%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 230reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
27
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 20 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @moryak_arbitrazhnik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC167 views12 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Hello Человеки. Прошла новая волна банов в Reddit. Что пожило пару дней и было готово к запуску, все умерло. Взяли новые акки, уже получше качества, пару дней спокойного постинга, прогрева и запуск. По заливу на фб. Все было на быстрых парах, все уже готово, креативы, ленды, кабинеты загружены. Все готово к запуску, и теперь человек молчит. Подождем еще немного, будет дело может, если же не нет, значит такова судь

👍82👨‍💻2

1 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC254 views8 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

На выходных запустил кабинеты и наблюдаю статистику. Хотелось бы что бы это было так, но всегда есть свои моменты. Агентство должно выдать свежие Реддит акки, и будем заново запускать модельку. Фб также уже на легком старте, все готово, только вот одна пп приказала долго жить, и пришлось искать замену. Так что работаем Человеки.

👍5😁3

31 Jul 2026, 18:11 UTC300 views18 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Всегда был любителем пульнуть разговор что найду себе старенькую но багательную итальянку, и закончу с морями. Так вот человеки, сегодня заводил акки, прокинул все, и нужно было спустить в город с гор. И по классике всегда залетаю на кофе в так сказать свой топовый бар, владелец португалец, кайфовый дядька, ну и он один из не многих кто говорит по Англ. Стоим мы с ним травим басни, и наблюдаем картинку, подъезжает

😁8💅4🐳3🤣3

31 Jul 2026, 09:30 UTC273 views21 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤩87❤‍🔥4🥰1😱1

31 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC269 views12 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Hello people. Тута мы. Такое чувство что кто то сделал мою куклу Вуду, и пиздует ей стабильно об стену. Никак не получаеться нормально запустить Реддит, так как берем акки где попало, и им через два/три дня похороны. Остается только вариант заказывать и ждать пару недель акки у проверенного человека, который наверное топ на рынке. Что бы не сидеть без дела, смотрю вот такой момент. На днях мне поступило предложени

👍62👏2😎2

29 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC291 views10 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Немного о тех стороне этого процесса. Все в разы проще чем при работе с ФБ. Все что вам нужно это прокси, ну и само собой акки. Дальше вы берете одну/две Аишки, для генерации заголовков или же подогнать текст под сленг США. Так как они сильно палят если текст написан аишкой на отебись, и могут вальнуть бан за это. Сам постинг не тянет за собой много времени, тут уже больше выбрать нормальный контент с полученного

3👍32👨‍💻2

29 Jul 2026, 07:36 UTC285 views8 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026

Good morning people. Зашел с утра проверить один из акков, который уже был на этапе добавления Линка на Онлик. И он отлетел, не понимаю почему. Акк который я юзал для того что бы набить руку так же отлетел, хотя я его не трогал уже более недели. Если брать акки которые уже плюс минус готовы к заливу, то прайс на них близок к 100$. Если брать акк которому нужен фарм там в районе 40$. На данный момент немного больно

🤝4🕊2😢2

28 Jul 2026, 15:28 UTC315 views10 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Good Day Люди. За последние пару дней есть немного движения. Пошел постинг постов, некоторые взяли по 2к показов, даже упали первые подписчики на акк Реддита. Завтра уже планируется заводиться линк на акк, и гнать трафик непосредственно на сам Онлифанс аккаут. Немного впитываю информацию по этому направлению, и как везде есть свои моменты. Тут самая не простая ситуация с акками, с фб было то что кабинеты постоянно

👍43🔥3

25 Jul 2026, 07:46 UTC420 views8 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Нашел интересный момент пару минут назад. 11 июля Reddit добавил функцию оставлять видео комментарии. Функция доступна всем пользователям в SFW-сообществах. Но есть моменты что в адалт саббах такой формат не доступен. Но все таки мы можем юзать вот такой моментик для улучшения качества фарма акаунта, только нужно будет что бы моделька была одетая, и сказала что то со смыслом. Так же моя извилина говорит что в ближ

3❤‍🔥2🤝2🌚1

24 Jul 2026, 15:43 UTC391 views10 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Hello Человеки. Втрой день пробую запостить первые посты в сабах, и ловлю фильтра. Плюсом сегодня еще лег Реддит. Что я как понял последнее время частая проблема. Но не критическая. Так же для работы с адалтом посоветовали хорошую аишку flowgpt. В целом все очень удобно, только момент что она так же иногда сильно тупит, и нужно давать подзатыльника. После последней волны банов и проблем с акками, цены на них подн

❤‍🔥52😁2🐳1

23 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC355 views12 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Hello people. Не успел приехать, уже на СТО. Как не одно то другое, сегодня ночь нужно ехать забирать человеков с аэропорта, а я сижу уже варений со своим этим Кино. Последнее время как будто снимаюсь в сериале Впитать Побольше Гавна. По моменту запуску, как уже и говорил, с модельками есть момент, что нужно долго ждать каких либо действий от нее, вот уже 2 день ждем передачу акка. Благо уже есть контент, и с эти

😁7🌚3😢2

21 Jul 2026, 18:14 UTC361 views4 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

🎰 GAMBLING ПАРТНЕРКА С ВЫПЛАТАМИ ДО $500 CPA Арбитражники, хватит лить трафик на партнерки с копеечными ставками! TraffX — специализированная платформа для Gambling-трафика с реальными деньгами: 💸 Деньги: • CPA до $500 за депозит • RevShare до 50% пожизненно • Hybrid-модели под твой объем • Выплаты БЕЗ задержек — еженедельно/дважды в месяц 🎯 Офферы: • Топовые казино и букмекеры • GEO: CIS, LATAM, Европа, Азия • Вы

👀2👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @moryak_arbitrazhnik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,122,701 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Моряк Арбитражник” (@moryak_arbitrazhnik), 764 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moryak_arbitrazhnik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.