Channel
@mortal_beting
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
28,229subscribers
-1,099 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002236655100 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mortal_beting |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mortal_beting |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 28,229 | -100 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 28,329 | -120 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 28,449 | -59 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:08 | 28,508 | -1,236 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:25 | 29,744 | +1,234 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 28,510 | -43 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 28,553 | -32 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 28,585 | -60 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 28,645 | -36 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 28,681 | -25 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 28,706 | -25 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:29 | 28,731 | -16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 28,747 | -26 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 28,773 | -63 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:28 | 28,836 | -42 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 28,878 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 28,888 | +39 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 28,849 | -31 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 28,880 | -32 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 28,912 | first reading |
608 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 608 (7 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 165,742 |
| Reactions total | 11,978 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Sept 2026, 06:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
14,587 reactions across 608 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 8,980 | 61.6% | |
| 👏 | 2,553 | 17.5% | |
| 👌 | 1,457 | 9.99% | |
| 🍾 | 954 | 6.54% | |
| 🎉 | 643 | 4.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 608 of the 608 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,587 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 608 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mortal_beting. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 608 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
❌ افرادی هم که با شرطبندی اشنا نیستند ❌ تو این اوضاع سخت اقتصادی و درآمد های کم من با علمی که دارم توی شرطبندی باعث سود خیلیا شدم و با من توی شرطبندی باخت نمیدی اگر آمار بالا نگاه بکنید من روی هر فرم ۵ ملیون الا ۱۰ ملیون میبندم و همیشه برنده بودم .هم خودم هم اعضا کانالم . اگر توهم میخوای استارت کنی این پایین لینک اپلیکیشن شرطبندی معتبر و آشنایی با شرطبندی و فرم هارو براتون میزارم🥷👇 دانلود اپلیکیشن بت وینر آموزش …
👌2
راند اول وین👍 نوش جونتون🐸
👍12👏6
کمتر از 39.5 مورتال 1
👏11
یکی دیگه بریم؟
👍31
راند اول وین👍 نوش جونتون🐸
👍15👏5🍾1
کمتر از 32.5
👍9🍾3
آماده لایو🥷❤️
👍14👏4🍾2
راند اول وین👍
👍17👏4🎉1
کمتر از 36.5
👍12👌2🎉1
میریم جبرانی
👏17👍5
کمتر از 27.5
👍17👏5🍾4👌3
راند اول وین👍 نوش جونتون🐸
👏15🍾4
Showing the 12 most recent of 608 posts we hold for @mortal_beting. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مورتال کمبت بت X|11” (@mortal_beting), 28,229 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mortal_beting.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.