Channel
@morozovaenglishtg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,060subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002217933515 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @morozovaenglishtg |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/morozovaenglishtg |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 1,060 | -3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 1,063 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 1,065 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 1,067 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:22 | 1,068 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 1,071 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 1,075 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 1,079 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 1,083 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 1,083 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
40 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 72.5% | |
| 💘 | 5 | 12.5% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 10.0% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2025 to 20 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Past Simple: тонкости, которые часто упускают ➡️ После did глагол в начальной форме: ✅ Did you go? ❌ Did you went? ➡️ Неправильные глаголы бывают неожиданными: teach → taught, catch → caught ➡️ Если есть точное время (yesterday, last week, in 2020) → всегда Past Simple, а не Present Perfect. ➡️ В отрицании тоже без -ed: ✅ I didn’t go ❌ I didn’t went 📝 Задание: напиши одно предложение про свой вчерашний день в Pa…
❤5
«Как учить английский?» — один из самых частых вопросов, который я получаю от подписчиков. И наконец у меня для вас есть готовый ответ 🙌🏼 (над этим я работала для вас всё лето) 🤫 *Барабанная дробь* 🥁 Я собрала весь свой опыт и оформила его в подробный Чек-лист “EnglishLand”! 📚 учебники, по которым я сама выучила английский; • книги, блоги, фильмы и сериалы, которые реально помогают; • сайты и ресурсы, без кото…
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
Задание: Поставь глаголы в Past Continuous 👇 1. At 8 p.m. yesterday I (do) my homework. 2. They (watch) TV when the phone (ring). 3. She (not listen) to music when I came in. 👉 Жду твои варианты в комментариях 💬
❤4
Past Continuous (I was doing) Когда используем: Past Continuous описывает действие, которое происходило в определённый момент в прошлом. ✏️ Примеры: • At 10:30 they were playing tennis 🎾 • I was watching TV when you called 📺📞 Как образуется: was/were + V-ing • I/he/she/it → was playing • we/you/they → were playing Когда употребляем: 1️⃣ Действие в процессе в прошлом: • This time last year I was living in Hon…
🤯2
Задание: Поставь глаголы в Past Simple 👇 1. Yesterday I (go) to school. 2. Mozart (write) more than 600 pieces of music. 3. They (not watch) TV last night. 👉 Напиши свои ответы в комментариях ✍️
❤4
Past Simple (I did) Когда используем: Past Simple описывает действия, которые произошли в прошлом и завершились. ✏️ Примеры: • Mozart lived in Austria. • He wrote more than 600 pieces of music. • Yesterday I went to the cinema. Как образуется: 1. ✅ Правильные глаголы → добавляем -ed work → worked invite → invited 2. ❗ Неправильные глаголы → своя форма go → went see → saw write → wrote Вопросы и отрицания: •…
💘3
Ответы: 1️⃣ is being → временное поведение сейчас, не его обычный характер. 2️⃣ is being → «очень милая именно сейчас», подчёркиваем ситуацию. 3️⃣ are you → состояние, поэтому используем Simple. Итог: 📌 Be в Continuous → поведение сейчас. 📌 Be в Simple → характеристика или состояние.
Выбери правильную форму: To Be или Being? 🍏 I can’t understand why he … so selfish. 🍏 Sarah … very nice to me at the moment. 🍏 Would you like something to eat? … hungry? 👉 Напиши свои варианты в комментариях, а правильный разбор будет в следующем посте.
Задание для тебя: найди ошибки в предложениях 👇 • I’m knowing the answer. • She’s liking this song a lot. • We’re hearing some strange noises. • He’s remembering your name. 👉 Напиши в комментариях правильные варианты!
Правильные ли эти предложения? • It’s not true. I’m not believing it. • I’ve never eaten that fruit. What is it tasting like? • Look over there. What are you seeing? Разбор: ❌ I’m not believing it ✅ I don’t believe it Believe — глагол состояния (state verb), Continuous не используется. ❌ What is it tasting like? ✅ What does it taste like? Taste в значении «иметь вкус» — state verb. ❌ What are you seeing? ✅ …
📝 Задание для тебя: Напиши в комментариях по одному предложению с people, fishes, foods или fruits. Проверю, правильно ли ты используешь
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @morozovaenglishtg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“morozovaenglish” (@morozovaenglishtg), 1,060 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/morozovaenglishtg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.