خب دوستان تموم شدددد 🤍✨ امیدوارم از نتیجه ها راضی باشید و به نظرم نکته های خیلی خوبی توشون گفته شده در حدی که خوندن همشون هم خالی از لطف نیست و خیلی آموزندست. شخصاً راضیم از چالش 🤝🏻
❤4

Channel
@moraleoch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001715978483 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @moraleoch |
| Description | پاسخ چالش های چنل مورال🤝🏻 @lightomoral |
| Created | 31 August 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/moraleoch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 1 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 1 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 31 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
7 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 85.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2022 to 1 September 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
خب دوستان تموم شدددد 🤍✨ امیدوارم از نتیجه ها راضی باشید و به نظرم نکته های خیلی خوبی توشون گفته شده در حدی که خوندن همشون هم خالی از لطف نیست و خیلی آموزندست. شخصاً راضیم از چالش 🤝🏻
❤4
- تیپ شش های انیاگرام اشخاصی بصری و آنالیزگر هستند. اونها قابلاعتماد و وفادارند اما همچنین میتونن نگران، شکاک و هراسان هم باشند. بزرگترین مشکلِ تیپ شش ها این هستش که بدون حل کردن ریشهی ناامنی های عاطفی شون، برای ساختن یک محیط امن اطرافشون تلاش میکنن. وقتی که اونها چگونگی روبهرو شدن با نگرانی هاشونو یاد بگیرن، میتونن بالاخره در هر حال آرامش و شجاعت شونو حفظ کنن، حتی در شرایط متغیر و نامعلوم. و این برای تیپ ش…
❤1
- مورد تشویق و تایید قرار گرفتن و همچنین دیده شدن ارزشمندی شون از سوی دیگران و کسایی که مورد تایید شون هستن، برای 4𝚆3 ها خیلی مهمه و از انگیزه های کلیدی شون محسوب میشه. در چنین شرایطی اگر شخص 4𝚆3 درونگرا باشه، ممکنه ابراز کردن خودش براش به چالش مهم و سختی تبدیل بشه؛ زیرا که ابراز کردن خودش شرط مهمی برای دیده شدن و سیر شدن اون انگیزه هاش هست. اما اگر 4𝚆3 ِ درونگرا بتونه روی این قضیه کار کنه، به احساس رضایت و رشد شخص…
- شخصیت های 𝙸𝙽𝚃𝙹_𝙰، نسبت به شاخص 𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚋𝚞𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚝 آنها که 𝙸𝙽𝚃𝙹_𝚃 هست، جسور تر هستند و خلاقانهتر عمل میکنند. همچنین جسوری و شوخطبعیِ 𝙸𝙽𝚃𝙹 ها معمولا حساب شده تر و هدفمند تر از دیگر تایپ هاست، پس به انگیزهی پشتش فکر کنید ~ - 𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑎 𝐷𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑔𝑢𝑦
- شخصیت های 𝙸𝙽𝙵𝙿، ایدهآلیست هایی هستن که توی احتمالات و ایده هاشون برای آینده و سناریو هاشون غرق میشن. اونها توی درک کردن و برقرار کردن ارتباط با ایدهها و سناریو های دیگران نیز مهارت دارن و احساسات عمیق پشت دیدگاه های دیگران رو درک میکنن ~ - 𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝐷𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐵𝑎𝔥𝑎𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑧
- در 𝙸𝙽𝚃𝙿 ها، کارکرد شهودی شون و ادراکی بودنشون، درونگرایی شونو تقویت میکنه و گاهی به اون ها یکجور حس جدایی از جریان زندگی رو القا میکنه. درگیر شدن با کار ها و مسئولیت هایی و به ویژه داشتن دوست های خوب در این مواقع، به اونها کمک میکنه که دوباره به دنیای بیرون وصل بشن. - 𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝐷𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐵𝑢𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑙𝑦
- اشخاصی با هادس قوی، عمیق و دروننگر هستند. اونها به خودشناسی اهمیت زیادی میدن و گاه اونقدر در خودشون غرق میشن که از دنیای بیرون جدا میفتند. همه چی براشون بهتر خواهد بود اگر به این درک برسند که گاهی نیاز به تعامل با دیگران و دنیای بیرون دارند تا تعادل رو درونشون رعایت کنن. - 𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝐷𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐴𝑙𝑒𝑥
- رفیق دلم نیومد بهت نگم، تایپ انیاگرام و 𝙼𝙱𝚃𝙸 ـت دقیقا با کریس همسورث یکیه و فکر کنم حتی از نظر کهنالگویی هم بهش میخوری😂✨ و بله... 8𝚆7 ها شخصیت های حمایتگر و همزمان تکرو ـی دارند. اونها پرانرژی و اجتماعی هستن و درکنارش به حریم شخصی شون اهمیت میدن و از آرامش شون مراقبت میکنن. - 𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝐷𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐽𝑎𝑦
- شخصیت های 5𝚆6، گرایش به حل مشکلات و مسائل دارند. اون ها همچنین نسبت به عزیزان شون وفادار و متعهدند و برای کمک و یاری ازشون دریغ نمیکنند. از اون دسته دوست های قابلاتکا و فرهیخته ای هستن که میشه روی مشورت باهاشون هم حساب کرد ✨ - 𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝐷𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑉𝑖𝑙𝑦𝑐𝔥
- شخصیت های 𝙸𝚂𝚃𝙹، اگر بتونن ارتباط خوبی با این کار برقرار کنن، از به اشتراک گذاشتن علایق شون و روزشون با دیگران لذت میبرن. 𝙸𝚂𝚃𝙹 ها این کار رو به سبک منسجم و روون خودشون انجام میدن و میتونید ازشون یکجور وایبِ 𝚊𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚌 واقعاً دوست داشتنی بگیرید ~ - 𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝐷𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝔥𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑦
❤1
- شخصیت های 𝙸𝙽𝙵𝙿، متفکر های احساسی و آرمانگرایی هستند. توی زاویهی دید 𝙸𝙽𝙵𝙿 ها به مسائل زندگی، یک معنی نهفته ای وجود داره که میتونه برخواسته از الگو های ذهنی و زخم های شخصی شون باشه و همچنین درک کردن آنها میتونه دیگران رو به یک نگاه عمیقتر دعوت کنه. - 𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝐷𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑊𝑖𝑙𝑦
👍1
- شخصیت های 4𝚆3، ترکیبی از احساسات ژرف و جاهطلبی های اجتماعی هستن. کارآمدی در اجتماع و میان عزیزانشون، براشون ارزشمنده و آدم های رمانتیکی هستند. همچنین اون ها احتمالا شخصیتی مودی و دراماتیک هم دارند :) - 𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝐷𝑒𝑎𝑟 푸른 고래
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @moraleoch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,033,674 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@moraleoch named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑀𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝕔𝕙𝕒𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑒” (@moraleoch), 1 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moraleoch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.