🌸🌸🌸🌸🤍🤍🤍
custom 528288217434374374397custom 524676528754553565140

Channel
@moonshorty
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,996subscribers
+415 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001622357065 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @moonshorty |
| Description | рекл: https://t.me/reklamachuchi @moonshortybot вп/сотрудничество: @ddchuchi @whydolboeb |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/moonshorty |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 9,996 | -24 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 10,020 | -28 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 10,048 | +250 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 9,798 | +330 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 9,468 | -49 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 9,517 | -61 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 9,578 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 9,581 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 9,581 | first reading |
35 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (31 July 2026 – 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 65,591 |
| Reactions total | 4,495 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
4,495 reactions across 35 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5282882174343743743 | 1,034 | 23.0% | |
| custom 5246824300396182182 | 570 | 12.7% | |
| custom 5283266294743859667 | 567 | 12.6% | |
| custom 5312455433653358694 | 375 | 8.34% | |
| custom 5246937438424693235 | 324 | 7.21% | |
| custom 5247041316503713434 | 324 | 7.21% | |
| custom 5445311979143056787 | 251 | 5.58% | |
| custom 5348495492076572638 | 214 | 4.76% | |
| custom 5314719757591653419 | 208 | 4.63% | |
| custom 5429547254438445570 | 208 | 4.63% | |
| custom 5251465317502188022 | 166 | 3.69% | |
| custom 5426842193841110670 | 75 | 1.67% | |
| custom 5314676803623726459 | 66 | 1.47% | |
| custom 5246765287545535651 | 58 | 1.29% | |
| custom 5251376738096673866 | 55 | 1.22% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,495reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @moonshorty. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🌸🌸🌸🌸🤍🤍🤍
custom 528288217434374374397custom 524676528754553565140
маленький принц :(
custom 528288217434374374323custom 52467652875455356519
скидка на рекламу. пост 24ч.+ сторис 48ч. + 1 подгон = 990₽ 31.08.+ места личные тгк писать @ddchuchi
custom 528288217434374374312custom 52467652875455356519
✴️.✴️
custom 524693743842469323527custom 528288217434374374317
писят 🤩 еще
custom 52469374384246932359custom 52470413165037134345
🤩 Japan quite life girl ˖⊹ ࣪ ˖ ໒꒱ https://t.me/moonliaaw3 .✦ ݁˖ https://t.me/moonliaaw3 https://t.me/moonliaaw3 .✦ ݁˖
custom 524693743842469323516custom 52470413165037134349
🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝 🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝 🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝 🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝
custom 5246937438424693235203custom 524704131650371343471
🤩🤩
custom 5247041316503713434239custom 524693743842469323569
так нас уже десятка 🤗 сделала для вас конкурс тута @moonshortybot 1 место 500 🖤 2 место 200🖤 3-10 места 💝 заходите и участвуйте (в приложении- вкладка "конкурс") . все пока 🫶
custom 528288217434374374330custom 524682430039618218211
⭐️🤍⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️🤍 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️🤍⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 𝐤𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧♡ 🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦 🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦 𝐤𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧♡ 🪦🪦🪦🪦 𝐤𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧♡ 🪦🪦🪦🪦
custom 524682430039618218226custom 52828821743437437439
Signed >.<
скоро удаляю папочку. успей добавить 🤩
custom 528288217434374374310custom 52468243003961821824
еще 55 🖤 и 36🌟 ))
custom 524682430039618218219custom 528288217434374374313
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @moonshorty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 196,937 of 1,585,237entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“moonshorty” (@moonshorty), 9,996 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moonshorty.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.