Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

LilyDeLulu

@moonolouge

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,152subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001257296579
TypeChannel
Username@moonolouge
Created6 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/moonolouge

Growth

1,1521,1531,152.56 Aug 2026, 10:08 — 1,153 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 12:02 — 1,153 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:13 — 1,152 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 10:087 Aug 2026, 09:13
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,152–1,153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 09:131,152-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:021,153no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:081,153first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.0%
avg views ÷ 1,152 subscribers
Avg views / post
288
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held16 (23 July 20262 August 2026)
Views total4,602
Reactions total148
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

148 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓5637.8%
3725.0%
😭3020.3%
🔥2013.5%
🦄53.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC136 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

she looks like she's gonna make it lemonade

20🍓4

Signed

2 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC146 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Completed this one today

🔥192🍓1

Signed

1 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC180 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

also the right one's glasses doesnt make sense I know Just roll w it

🍓3

Signed

1 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC232 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

also I drew some ocs. I will prob change the middle 1 cause I dont like it :[

🍓26

Signed

27 Jul 2026, 06:30 UTC372 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://t.me/heyvanatemdad/5403?single پستو اینجا نزاشتم چون ممکنه بعضی ها به عکسا حساس بشن ولی اگر میتونید کمک کنید

Signed

27 Jul 2026, 05:52 UTC314 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

I do not do that shit in my dreams in fact. Not easy peazy. The rest are fine, but calculus...

🦄4

Signed

26 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTC333 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Calculus?? Easy peazy i do that shit in my dreams

😭6

Signed

26 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC332 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Studying so much math, I'm solving equations and algebra in my SLEEP

😭18

Signed

24 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC408 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

I plan on joining this شاید هفته ی اول رو نتونم شرکت کنم ولی از هفته ی دوم حتما میام و تمرینا رو هم اینجا میزارم. اگر شما هم دوست داشتین بیاین شاید تو ویس کالا هم دیگه رو دیدیم

🍓5

Signed

24 Jul 2026, 11:40 UTC348 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @moampampampaPhoto

خب دوستان یک چالشی هست به اسم « چالش ۵۲ هفته» یه مدتی هست که با بچها درموردش حرف میزدیم که بصورت گروهی انجامش بدیم . بصورت خلاصه بخوام بگم به مدت یک سال هر هفته اصول طراحی و تصویر سازی رو بر اساس موضوعاتی که بهمون میده تمرین میکنیم دوستانی که علاقمندن باهم تمرین کنیم توی گروه ⚠️⚠️⚠️‼️‼️‼️ (توی گروه که اد شدین دکمه من رباط نیستم رو بزنین که بتونین پیام بدین ) ⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️ عضو بشین اونجا باقی توضیحات میزارم

2🍓1

Signed

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @moonolouge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 665,260 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LilyDeLulu” (@moonolouge), 1,152 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moonolouge.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.