Channel
@moonlitsolace
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004446387171 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @moonlitsolace |
| Created | 29 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/moonlitsolace |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 7 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 7 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (29 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 98 |
| Reactions total | 37 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
37 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 67.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 18.9% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 13.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Люди иногда такие странные. Говорят, что любят, умоляют разблокировать их, а потом пытаются задеть тебя, смеясь над тем, что кто-то другой стал твоим парнем. И это они называют любовью? Или когда они находят другую девушку, не получают от неё шанса, а потом без стыда и совести возвращаются к тебе, говоря: «Теперь нужна только ты» — разве это любовь? Как же это мерзко и отвратительно выглядит. Не осталось ни уважения,…
❤1❤🔥1
И я поняла одну вещь: когда мы были вместе, я могла провести с ним хоть много лет и всё равно чувствовала бы себя счастливой, будто мы познакомились только вчера. Но прошло уже около шести месяцев с момента нашего расставания, и я даже не могу его вспомнить. Будто этих трёх лет отношений никогда и не было. Будто человека, которого я когда-то любила, вообще никогда не существовало в моей жизни. Когда я вижу его, я не …
❤3
Unga Nega meni tashlab ketyabsan dedm u bolsa kim seni tashlab ketyabdi dedi va hayotimdan yoqoldi vaqt otib shuni tushundim u hayotimda emas yuragimda butun umr ketmas yaradek qolishini aytgan ekan Moonlit Solace🫧
❤2❤🔥1
Я почувствовала, что изменилась. Кто-то, глядя только на мою внешность, может сказать: «Ты почти не изменилась». Но разве изменения бывают только во внешности? Нет. Изменились мои чувства, мои слова, моя речь, мои шутки, мой смех, моя доброта, моя любовь, моё умение ценить людей и поддерживать их. Люди могут сделать вывод, лишь посмотрев на меня. Но если однажды поговорят со мной или случайно встретятся со мной, тогд…
❤3
Я любила его всем сердцем. А он любил меня лишь временными чувствами. Пока я мечтала о нашем будущем, он выбрал другую. Его предательство не сломало меня — оно лишь научило одной истине: человек, который не боится тебя потерять, никогда по-настоящему тебя не любил. Moonlit Solace
❤2❤🔥1
Может быть, он скучает по мне, а может, по своей новой девушке — я не знаю. Но что бы ни было, когда рядом была я, он всегда писал и старался сохранить наши отношения. Возможно, ему стыдно из-за своей измены. А если он так ведёт себя только ради новой девушки — что ж, это нормально. Но, если честно, я уже увидела, что они несчастливы. Moonlit Solace🎞️
❤3
Люди жалуются, что их не замечали, не любили, им изменяли, их бросали, они совершали ошибки или что их не ценили вовремя. Но никто не говорит себе с улыбкой, что это всего лишь первый удар жизни. В наше время мы чаще видим людей, которые страдают из-за любви, больше, чем из-за денег, бизнеса или счастья. Но есть вещи гораздо важнее. Зависеть от одного человека — это глупость. Да, вспоминайте, скучайте, сожалейте, но …
❤2🕊2
Если она любит ночи, освещённые лунным светом, она не станет винить сон. Она поспит днём, чтобы ночью отдыхать в тишине и спокойствии, любоваться лунным светом, встречать рассвет и слушать пение петуха, мяуканье кошек и звуки разных ночных насекомых. Moonlit Solace🌷
❤1❤🔥1🕊1
Искать прежние чувства в себе — это немного странно. Вместо счастья ощущаешь лишь сильную боль, а слёзы не перестают течь. И в какой-то момент понимаешь, что если твоё сердце всё ещё там, это вовсе не значит, что твоё место тоже там. Moonlit Solace🧩
❤1❤🔥1
Men hech kimni ornini bosmayman ular ham meni ornimni bosa olishmaydi mayli mendan otib ketishar yoki otolmas shunchaki hammani oz orni va tabiati bor eski odamlarni orni boshqa yangilarniki ham shunchaki odamlarni yerga urishni toxtatib hayotidan chiqib keting Moonlit Solace🫠
❤2🕊1
Men yutdimi yoki yutqazdimi nima farqi bor eng muhimi men xiyonat qilmadim ozimga ishongandek ishondim qolimdan kelgancha borimni berdim sodiq boldim lekin bunga javoban nima olganim hali hamon esimda Moonlit Solace✨
❤🔥2❤1🕊1
Oy nuri ostidagi taskin-har oyga qaraganimda dardim soginchim ishlarim qayguyim hafaligim ogir otgan kunim hayotimdagi yomon voqealarim unutiladi Moonlit Solace🙂↔️
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @moonlitsolace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 701,902 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Moonlit Solace” (@moonlitsolace), 7 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moonlitsolace.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.