Channel
@moonlighttoxicity
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
50subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003999207991 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @moonlighttoxicity |
| Description | Новая история — новая глава. Здесь будут новости, личное мнение, спорные темы и честные обсуждения. Не боимся не соглашаться, спорить и отстаивать свою позицию. Хочется создать пространство, где интересно не только читать, но и общаться. |
| Created | 2 November 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 4 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/moonlighttoxicity |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 13:22 | 50 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 2 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (2 November 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,171 |
| Reactions total | 42 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 13:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
42 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 42 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 2 November 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Любое действие Хейли Бибер — это тренд. Кажется, Хейли достаточно просто что-то сделать, чтобы TikTok тут же превратил это в новую тенденцию. И неважно, насколько это странно или бессмысленно. Всё началось с жемчужного маникюра, затем были её готовки. Поначалу это выглядело мило и интересно. Но потом… Клубничный макияж, которому придумали отдельное название, хотя Хейли просто нанесла чуть больше румян. Маленькая о…
❤3
Адриана Лима и нездоровая худоба. После показа Victoria’s Secret многие восхищались фигурой Адрианы Лимы и её внешностью. Писали, что она вернула свой вайб 2000-х. Также в сети появляются видео, на которых Лима демонстрирует, насколько часто занимается спортом. Но, честно говоря, у меня есть сомнения, что дело исключительно в тренировках. Её тело выглядит измождённым, а сама она — уставшей. Возникает ощущение, что …
❤3
Семейство Кардашьян и бесконечная реклама. Смотрю уже 8-й сезон «Семейства Кардашьян» и, честно говоря, меня начинает раздражать происходящее. Кажется, что шоу окончательно превратилось в одну большую рекламную площадку. Кортни постоянно говорит о детях и своих витаминах Lemme, Ким — о съёмках и SKIMS, Хлои продвигает Good American и попкорн Cloud, Кендалл — 818, а Кайли, как обычно, Kylie Cosmetics. Я понимаю, чт…
❤4
Селена Гомес — жертва косметолога. Все мы знаем, как многие скучают по её baddie era: сексуальные образы, smokey eyes и при этом то самое baby face. Но сейчас поклонники всё чаще обсуждают изменения во внешности певицы: скулы, подбородок, разрез глаз. Многие защищают Селену, списывая всё на болезнь, возраст и естественные изменения. Но действительно ли дело только в этом? Как бы Селена ни говорила о любви к себе и…
❤10
Victoria’s Secret и непо-ангелы при деньгах Что может быть смешнее, чем первый выход ангела, открытие показа, крылья и Fantasy Bra за 50 миллионов? Конечно же, Кайли Дженнер. Многие спрашивают, что она там забыла, ведь она даже не ангел. Только настоящих ангелов там практически не осталось — зато непо-детишек предостаточно. Помните, как Джиджи и Белла ходили на кастинги? Даже Джиджи получала отказы. А Кайли просто…
❤6
Victoria’s Secret и музыкальные выступления. Раньше, когда на шоу выступали селебрити, всё было направлено на одно — подчеркнуть ангелов и сделать их главными звёздами вечера. И все прекрасно понимают, насколько сложно было заслужить статус ангела Victoria’s Secret в те времена. Не то что сейчас. Смотрю на сегодняшние шоу и задаюсь вопросом: Victoria’s Secret хочет, чтобы мы покупали бельё или подписывались на Spot…
❤8
Хейли Бибер и её новое интервью. В интервью Хейли заявила: «Меня не интересует чрезмерное потребление. Я думаю, что пространство красоты и так достаточно переполнено». И тут я немного задумалась. Более 20 пептидных блесков, чехлы для телефонов в десятках цветов, косметички к каждой коллекции, зеркальца, чехлы для пластырей от прыщей и даже брелоки-румяна. Не говоря уже об огромных подарочных коробках с крошечными п…
❤8
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @moonlighttoxicity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“moonlight toxicity” (@moonlighttoxicity), 50 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moonlighttoxicity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.