me?

Channel
на канал || life in poverty
@moonkitis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
137subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 9 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004406566305 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @moonkitis |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 30 September 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/moonkitis |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 12:54 | 137 | +5 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 17:22 | 132 | no change |
| 9 Nov 2026, 16:47 | 132 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 24.6%
- avg views ÷ 137 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 33.8
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 38.6%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 November 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 675 |
| Reactions total | 100 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 17:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 14s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
100 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5201882741863395331 | 20 | 20.0% | |
| custom 5253991952273137510 | 18 | 18.0% | |
| custom 5253523122233041166 | 17 | 17.0% | |
| custom 5332675564157301978 | 16 | 16.0% | |
| custom 5253812985280879736 | 10 | 10.0% | |
| custom 5251216973903188553 | 6 | 6.00% | |
| custom 5253921484744711270 | 5 | 5.00% | |
| custom 5393444541032335234 | 4 | 4.00% | |
| custom 5393290536390001159 | 3 | 3.00% | |
| custom 5393254974060790469 | 1 | 1.00% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 November 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
утро,ты идёшь в своих мыслях,к ситуации в стране давно привык,но пугает каждый раз черные номера и ты понимаешь, ночью оно снова будет. "ну и ладно" говоришь ты себе все как обычно, не отвыкать,после школы возвращаешься домой слова мамы "прикинь у них новая схема,они оставляют бпла на трассе и потом взрывают,в пробке больше не стоим" и тут задаётся вопрос, а я точно живу в стране которая даёт мне свободу, возможность…
custom 52535231222330411664custom 52538129852808797364custom 53932905363900011593
Posted without readable text
custom 52018827418633953314custom 52535231222330411664custom 52539919522731375104custom 52538129852808797362custom 52512169739031885531custom 52539214847447112701custom 53932549740607904691
каждый день ты ждёшь одно,только вот дни идут,а ты ждёшь,ждёшь и ждёшь, только вот чего ты ждёшь на самом деле?
рк,рп мнение по желанию
Posted without readable text
custom 52535231222330411666custom 52539919522731375106custom 53934445410323352344custom 52512169739031885533custom 53326755641573019783custom 52018827418633953312
все,мнение под разделители пожалуйста, я отдыхать
Sticker, posted without a caption
@letsgomake
custom 52018827418633953315custom 52539919522731375105custom 53326755641573019785
Sticker, posted without a caption
@outsiderhous3
custom 52535231222330411663custom 52018827418633953312custom 52512169739031885532
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @moonkitis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“на канал || life in poverty” (@moonkitis), 137 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moonkitis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.