✨🎀e 🎀etit 🎀rince ❄️ #pic
custom 528763759219864056147custom 539758462321769602519custom 539332971508165663010

Channel
@monrichs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
432subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001612995642 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @monrichs |
| Created | 12 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/monrichs |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 432 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:19 | 431 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 431 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 30 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
682 reactions across 11 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5188329165106998693 | 96 | 14.1% | |
| custom 5287637592198640561 | 95 | 13.9% | |
| custom 5262744846514283491 | 76 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5310221440774076668 | 62 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5260537478137275973 | 59 | 8.65% | |
| custom 5197257096445330356 | 50 | 7.33% | |
| custom 5192723449226747503 | 45 | 6.60% | |
| custom 5280958651765388038 | 29 | 4.25% | |
| custom 5397584623217696025 | 27 | 3.96% | |
| custom 5449482121804538704 | 26 | 3.81% | |
| custom 5393329715081656630 | 25 | 3.67% | |
| custom 5194992029477659316 | 22 | 3.23% | |
| custom 5474616008427726067 | 21 | 3.08% | |
| custom 5212989222348155936 | 19 | 2.79% | |
| custom 5298590299969323988 | 14 | 2.05% | |
| custom 5215273698273027732 | 11 | 1.61% | |
| custom 5321352973803088142 | 4 | 0.587% | |
| custom 5391003608038799075 | 1 | 0.147% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 682reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2025 to 11 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @monrichs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 August 2025 to 11 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
✨🎀e 🎀etit 🎀rince ❄️ #pic
custom 528763759219864056147custom 539758462321769602519custom 539332971508165663010
✨в коментарях фулл версія розворотами✨ до артів планую повернутись влітку 🐈
custom 539332971508165663015custom 52876375921986405619custom 53975846232176960258
✨✨✨✨✨ ✨всім бажаю приємного 2026 і всього найкращого у новому році! дякую, що залишаєтесь зі мною! ( і моїм непостійним існуванням тут😎) ✨🍒
custom 528763759219864056135custom 529859029996932398813custom 53910036080387990751
✨ 𖦹 ⚔️ ⋆.˚ 🐈⬛ 🤩e is just my 🤩ammy #pic #byler
custom 519725709644533035650custom 544948212180453870426custom 52876375921986405614custom 52985902999693239881
верлен зʼявився в основній манзі, а це значить пора було згадати батьків цього каналу 😊
custom 526053747813727597332
♥️. ⭐`🌟 #pic #bsd
custom 526274484651428349176custom 526053747813727597327
🎀emus 🎀oet 🫂 ⋆˙⟡ 🖋 ⋆˙⟡ 3/3 #pic #marauders
custom 518832916510699869344custom 521298922234815593619custom 521527369827302773211
🎀ing 🎀ames 🟤 🪵 ’ 🤩 ` 🌞 2/3 #marauders #pic
custom 518832916510699869352custom 519499202947765931622
🎀oldier 🎀irius 🤩 ‘ 🤩 1/3 #marauders #pic
custom 519272344922674750345custom 547461600842772606721
🌟 ׄ 🌟⋆🤩 ・ 🎀: @hoshiikq 🌟 #merch
custom 531022144077407666839custom 528095865176538803815custom 53213529738030881424
. . 🤩 * 🌟• .🌟?!!!🌟ʼ ʼ🌟:: #photos m : @monrichs
custom 531022144077407666823custom 528095865176538803814
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @monrichs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 810,014 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@monrichs named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“oct𖦹ber ˎˊ˗” (@monrichs), 432 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/monrichs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.