5 measurements spanning 14 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,383–1,390 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 01:58
1,384
-3
14 Sept 2026, 06:17
1,387
+2
10 Sept 2026, 16:19
1,385
-4
4 Sept 2026, 10:22
1,389
no change
4 Sept 2026, 09:47
1,389
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 1,384 subscribers
Avg views / post
200
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
20 (24 January 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
399
Reactions total
15
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
272 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
115
42.3%
❤
92
33.8%
🔥
31
11.4%
👎
25
9.19%
⚡
9
3.31%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 272 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🖥️ آموزش نصب و دانلود Cisco Packet Tracer:::
خب بروبچ، بریم سراغ نصب Cisco Packet Tracer 👀🌐
🔹 Step 1 | ورود به سایت
اول VPN رو روشن کنید و وارد سایت Cisco Networking Academy بشید:
🌐 https://www.netacad.com/
اگر از قبل Account دارید، روی Log In بزنید و وارد حسابتون بشید.
اگر Account ندارید، گزینهی Sign Up رو انتخاب کنید و مراحل Registration رو انجام بدید.
🔹 Step 2 | ساخت Account
در مرحلهی ثبتنام، اطلاعات خو…
بچههایی که دارین Network یاد میگیرین یا تو این حوزه کار میکنین، مخصوصاً اونایی که پایه Security هم دارن 👀
فک کنم اسم Cisco Packet Tracer حداقل یه بار به گوشتون خورده باشه، یا شاید خودتون باهاش کار کرده باشین.
گفتم اگه پایه باشین، آموزش Packet Tracer رو از صفر شروع کنیم؛ همزمان شبکه بسازیم، تست کنیم و کمکم بریم سراغ چیزای خفنتر! 🌐🔥
پایه این؟
اما همه ی این ها به این معنی نیست که برنامهنویسها خیالشون راحت باشه!
هوش مصنوعی شاید جای برنامهنویس رو نگیره
اما برنامهنویسی که بلد باشه از هوش مصنوعی استفاده کنه، احتمالاً جای برنامهنویسی رو که از اون استفاده نمیکنه بگیره!
پس اینجا بحث توانایی و مهارت عه!
فکر میکنین چه کسی قراره امنیت همین هوش مصنوعیهایی که هر روز دارن پیشرفتهتر میشن رو تأمین کنه؟ 🤔
جوابش سادهست...
متخصصهای امنیت سایبری. 🛡️
خیلیا فکر میکنن هوش مصنوعی قراره همهچیز رو خودش انجام بده؛ از برنامهنویسی گرفته تا پیدا کردن باگ و حتی دفاع از سیستمها.
اما واقعیت اینه که خود هوش مصنوعی هم یه نرمافزاره و نیاز به محافظت داره ن؟
یعنی ممکنه آسیبپذیری داشته باشه، ممکنه خروجی اشتباه بده، ممکنه دادههای…
حالا بیاین یه آمار جالب بدم بهتون...
طبق گزارش مجمع جهانی اقتصاد، تا سال ۲۰۳۰ حدود ۹۲ میلیون شغل ممکنه از بین بره یا تغییر اساسی کنه.
اما از اون طرف، حدود ۱۷۰ میلیون شغل جدید هم به وجود میاد...
یعنی هوش مصنوعی فقط شغلها رو حذف نمیکنه؛ شغلهای جدید هم میسازه.
سؤال اینجاست...
چه کسانی توی این بازار برنده میشن؟!
اونایی که خودشون رو با تکنولوژی وفق میدن👌
هوش مصنوعی شاید بتونه جای بعضی از برنامهنویسها رو بگیره... اما جای یک متخصص واقعی رو نه.
چرا؟ 🤔
🔹 چون تجربهی واقعی نداره!
🔹 چون درک عمیقی از نیازهای یک پروژه و کسبوکار نداره!
🔹 چون خلاقیتش بر پایه دادههاییه که قبلاً دیده، نه ایدههای کاملاً جدید!
🔹 چون وقتی با یک مسئله کاملاً جدید و پیچیده روبهرو بشه، هنوز به تصمیمگیری و قضاوت انسان نیاز داره!
🔹 چون نمیتونه مثل یک انسان با مشتری، تیم یا کاربر تعامل و مذا…
خب حالا چرا میگم هوش مصنوعی حداقل فعلاً نمیتونه جای برنامهنویسها رو به طور کامل بگیره؟
چون یه حقیقت ساده وجود داره...
بخش بزرگی از دنیایی که هر روز باهاش سر و کار داریم، روی نرمافزار ساخته شده.
همین ماشینی که سوارش میشی...
فکر کردی سیستم تهویه، صفحه نمایش، سنسورها، دوربین دنده عقب، کروز کنترل یا حتی بعضی از بخشهای موتور، چطوری با هم کار میکنن؟
پشت همهی اینا هزاران خط کد و تیمهای برنامهنویسی وجود داره.
یا…
خب رفقا...
از روی ریاکشنها مشخصه خیلیا فکر میکنن هوش مصنوعی بالاخره یه روز جای برنامهنویسها رو میگیره. 🤖
اما واقعیت یه کم پیچیدهتر از چیزیه که توی شبکههای اجتماعی میبینیم...
حداقل با وضعیت فعلی، هوش مصنوعی نمیتونه بهطور کامل جای یک برنامهنویس رو بگیره.
حالا چرا؟
رفقا یه سوال دارم ازتون 🤔
به نظرتون هوش مصنوعی واقعا میتونه جای برنامه نویس هارو بگیره؟
با ریاکشن جواب بدین.
فعلا هیج توضیحی نمیدم...
👎19👍17❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mongard_killer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
گویا نیوز @Gouya_news · 33,354 Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دوره رایگان مونگارد” (@mongard_killer), 1,384 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mongard_killer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.