Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Деньги и МЫ

Channel

Деньги и МЫ

@moneyinorg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,039subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001097425787
TypeChannel
Username@moneyinorg
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/moneyinorg

Growth

1,0391,0431,0416 August 2026 — 1,042 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,042 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,043 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,041 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,039 subscribers6 August 202625 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 19 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,038–1,044 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 05:271,039-2
22 Aug 2026, 11:421,041-2
15 Aug 2026, 16:181,043+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:511,042no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:221,042first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.5%
avg views ÷ 1,039 subscribers
Avg views / post
275
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 January 20265 August 2026)
Views total275
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

260 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😢5119.6%
😁4818.5%
👍4216.2%
🔥3212.3%
🖕218.08%
👎166.15%
🍾145.38%
🎉145.38%
🕊124.62%
🏆103.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 260reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 January 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 20 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @moneyinorg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 January 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC275 views11 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

О, как намаялась я с тобой, моя попытка № 5. Всё же санкции из ЕС имеют свой эффект и дают о себе знать, потому что Фридом Банк сейчас ещё в процессе «устаканивания» и банк перебрал много рублевых корр. счетов в разных банках за эти дни, с момента попадания «родственного» Цифра Банка под санкции в ЕС. Среди них были: 1. Цифра Банк 2. УнифондБанк 3. Кредит Европа Банк (КЕБ) 4. МБА-Москва. 5. .......... Судя по отзы

👍4😁3🍾1🎉1🏆1🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC548 views11 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Пятничный концерт. События вышли в четверг по санкциям из ЕС весьма интересные. Все мы привыкли к тому, что Европейские санкции не самые зубастые, но в этот раз они породили веселую бурю в паре устоявшихся «болот». Звёздная история, это попадание Цифра Банка под европейские санкции и это поломало в моменте переводы во Фридом банк через корр. счёт . Потому что Цифра Банк это очень очень родственный для казахского Фр

🔥5😁3😢3

3 Jul 2026, 07:27 UTC765 views14 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Государство Крупные банки не любит конкуренцию. Очередной инфо. вброс от РБК с громким заголовком, что за пределами топ-20 жизни нет. И эти банки не нужны, но по-факту это как очередное давление, чтобы допилить рынок под себя. Итог: Мы живём в исторический период, когда конкуренцию сжимают по-факту в ручном режиме. Хотя за пределами топ-20 есть много хороших банков, такие как КЕБ, Яндекс, WB Банк, Фора-Банк, Аванга

😢8🕊4👎1🔥1

29 Jun 2026, 13:09 UTC945 views7 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Ятаган от made in Kazakhstan На выходных были разные мысли про казахские банки и их текущие реалии по отношению к обладателям красных рф паспортов. Всё же ограничение в виде невозможности делать swift в Евро из БЦК и перспектива внедрения во всех банках биометрии для входа в приложение банка, это конечно же не шаги для удобного использования. Да, идёт закручивание гаек и любое ограничение по функционалу из-за цвета

👍4🕊1😁1😢1

19 Jun 2026, 07:33 UTC917 views13 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Андрюха, у нас cash back от красной буквы в пятницу, похоже 100%, по коням.

😁11🎉1🔥1

9 Jun 2026, 12:42 UTC≈1,720 views28 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Ограничения в 20 платёжных карт на гражданина утвердили. Сегодня, сразу во 2м и 3м чтении приняли поправки в рамках законопроекта "Антифрод 2.0". Далее по этапу мы ожидаем, когда 'допилят' единую базу платёжных карт в НСПК и далее при заявке на открытие платёжное карты, без одобрения этой базы, банк вам не выпустит и не выдаст платежную карту. И это нас ждёт примерно через год, как мне видится это 3й квартал 2027г.

😢12🖕8👎5😁2🕊1

25 May 2026, 07:29 UTC≈1,200 views7 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Правило 2+1 работает. При выборе категорий в конце месяца в который раз подтверждается следующая закономерность в Озон Банке и Альфа-Банке. 1) Если банк даёт нужные в моменте категории, то это обычно повторяется 2 месяца подряд, к примеру это 5812-5814 и транспорт, Аптеки и Пятёрочка/Перекресток. 2) После того как я использую выбранные категории и выбираю лимит по cash back чесноком в раойне 1/3 или около того, на

👍5🎉1🔥1

25 May 2026, 05:32 UTC912 views12 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Абьюз по-Примсоцки! Впервые вижу на своей практике такой финт ушами, когда банк 'депримирует' тебя за то, что ты по правилам бонусной программы платил только в повышенной категории и за это тебе прилетает - 0.8% в выборе категорий Cash back. Это и вправду, какая-то свежая мысль экономии по-дальневосточному)

😁6🎉3🏆1👍1🔥1

12 May 2026, 12:52 UTC≈1,090 views17 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Добровольно, нежно и любя. Все мобильные операторы будут интегрироваться с нац. мессенджером, а это по цепочке считай и дальнейшая интеграция с банками на отправку таких сообщений, потому что для банка оператор это надёжный источник. Зы. А вот если в макс не сможет направить валидационный код, то будет смс. Ззы. Надо будет часть банков, переделать на непубличный номер и будет все как было.

🖕8😢5👎2🕊1😁1

21 Apr 2026, 10:53 UTC≈1,210 views7 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

На РБК вышло интервью Ольги Скоробогатовой из ВТБ и интервью вышло интересное. Можно посмотреть view банка по важным вопросам.

🎉2👍2👎1🔥1🖕1

14 Apr 2026, 11:38 UTC≈1,360 views7 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Май обещает не только шашлыки. То один банк обещает срезать лимит выплаты по Cash back. То другой банк обещает новую версию своей программы лояльности, чтобы клиенты не заметили видимо. Да с такими изменениями по программа лояльности, как мне кажется мы и сами закроем счета в лишних банках. А какое банки для вас самые удобные и лояльные, назовите ваш топ 5 или топ 10 таких банков? Мой выбор: 1. Банк Санкт-Петербу

🔥4👎1😁1😢1

3 Apr 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,180 views17 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Додо пицца теперь без каши. Update. Вернули оплату картой в приложении. Из приложения Додо (у нас в Санкт-Петербурге) убрали способ оплаты картой в приложении. Оставили только СБП или наличные. Вот же зайки, лидеры рынка. Да, додо это самый крупный игрок в сегменте пицц. И они выступили пионером, и чую, скоро потянутся за ними и остальные игроки, кто будут таким образом эффективно экономить. з.ы. Выгребли только

😢7😁4🎉1👍1👎1🔥1🕊1🖕1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @moneyinorg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 719,793 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Деньги и МЫ” (@moneyinorg), 1,039 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moneyinorg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.