Channel

MoneyLead

@money_lead

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,302subscribers

+702 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1002120619417
Type	Channel
Username	@money_lead
Created	Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	7 August 2026
Last confirmed live	27 August 2026
Measurements held	8
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/money_lead

Growth

8 measurements spanning 20 days, net +702. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,488–7,408 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
27 Aug 2026, 21:05	7,302	+384
24 Aug 2026, 12:33	6,918	-52
20 Aug 2026, 17:12	6,970	-19
17 Aug 2026, 19:27	6,989	-66
14 Aug 2026, 13:08	7,055	-30
11 Aug 2026, 10:44	7,085	+491
8 Aug 2026, 04:12	6,594	-6
7 Aug 2026, 14:16	6,600	first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 12 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days: 42.1%; avg views ÷ 7,302 subscribers
Avg views / post: 3,080; 13 posts measured
Reaction rate: 1.18%; reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window: 13; of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
Window	Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held	33 (12 February 2026 – 19 August 2026)
Views total	39,990
Reactions total	470
Forwards / comments	not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken	20 Aug 2026, 03:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,583 reactions across 32 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
custom 5334887566804016544	740	20.7%
custom 5438339877127074225	656	18.3%
custom 5102856631562011824	564	15.7%
custom 5424972470023104089	494	13.8%
custom 5802910664150226061	478	13.3%
custom 4924700194123023462	256	7.14%
custom 5834866797085464046	223	6.22%
custom 5891063600885273198	172	4.80%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,583reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC449 views19 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Let’s break down what PhishDestroy is most likely doing here. Since they aren’t commenting publicly, we have to read between the lines, but it actually seems pretty straightforward. Their ultimate target is Valve, but Part 2 is heavily focused on their lawyers. Most likely, clients or regulators noticed the loophole, and now PD is essentially attacking the biggest law firm in Europe—and not just for the clout. It’s …

custom 51028566315620118245custom 53348875668040165445custom 54249724700231040895custom 54383398771270742253custom 58029106641502260611

19 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC438 views16 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Forwarded from @destroy_phishPhoto

Hey, corporate attack dogs.🐕💰 We are your target, not the companies. Why did you leak the data of the very corporations you were supposed to protect? We just dropped Part 2 of our investigation into the "elite" lawyers at Taylor Wessing. We proved it: the 830-page Steam data leak wasn't a one-off manual mistake by a single lawyer. It is an automated, systemic, firm-wide catastrophe. To save money on proper softwar…

custom 53348875668040165448custom 58029106641502260614custom 58910636008852731984

18 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC585 views26 reactionsread 20 August 2026

As for the 300 people and the circle, let's not call it a homophobic joke. If the fuckers who are supposed to protect data but actually leak it think that's okay, then look at their forefather . Taylor Wessing heavily sanitizes their history — Wikipedia literally has banners right there stating the article was edited by someone with a close connection and needs citations. Yet for some reason, there are no names or li…

custom 49247001941230234628custom 54383398771270742258custom 53348875668040165447custom 58348667970854640463

18 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC726 views17 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Just don't forget that all my certifications are strictly Blue Team - it's simply that you are lying fuckers and the world needs to be protected from you - this is by no means an attack - more like an observation - one that a court in England also observed back in 2019 - if your job is just to wear suits and threaten people over GDPR requests - we will write you a letter of recommendation to attach to the report you …

custom 53348875668040165448custom 58029106641502260615custom 51028566315620118244

18 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC659 views29 reactionsread 20 August 2026

The elite corporate lawyers—who think they are richer and more important than Valve—relying on a generic, outdated Aspose.PDF for .NET 20.8 library to save money on proper enterprise software. Wow, classy. 🏆🏆The core issue is that their script uses outdated software (Aspose.PDF for .NET 20.8) to draw black vector rectangles (re/f) over text coordinates instead of properly sanitizing and deleting the underlying text …

custom 542497247002310408911custom 543833987712707422511custom 49247001941230234627

18 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC613 views30 reactionsread 20 August 2026

You had exactly one year to realize that you are doing something not entirely legal — now others will realize it — that's how it works anyway. You made stupid, careless mistakes and you should have realized the scale of the risk you were taking. But the 2nd and 3rd parts of the article will, I think, spill everything that exists out into the world — though I am not the main source there, but still. 👄In general, all o…

custom 543833987712707422510custom 54249724700231040899custom 53348875668040165448custom 51028566315620118243

18 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC720 views23 reactionsread 20 August 2026

I wonder why they are so bold—have they lost their minds? Or does someone have a deal with the regulator that will turn into a collapse for someone, and it's too late to put on slippers because the house has already burned down? But it's very interesting that in the article they compare hounds to a dog — but oh well. While Tyler is calculating how much this will cost, I hope his doctors are studying the problems …

custom 542497247002310408910custom 53348875668040165448custom 49247001941230234625

16 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈4,100 views34 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🗿A quick announcement: sih[.]app — this browser extension and marketplace — has an owner. And that very same owner also owns CSGOFast. Steam📱 is fully aware of this. I think you get the picture. I estimate it will take roughly 100 days, give or take, without any special promotion, for a serious itch to start in Valve's ass🤡. And once that syndrome kicks in, you can close your eyes — there will be no stopping the av…

custom 542497247002310408917custom 49247001941230234627custom 54383398771270742257custom 58348667970854640463

16 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC≈4,020 views40 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Valve, were you forced to scrub mentions of Russia's allies (Cuba, Iran, Syria) from your policies, or did you just run the numbers and realize how much dirty money was flowing in? If a terrorist state is coercing you, speak up—don't be afraid. Bending to their threats of piracy isn't worth violating US federal law. They are terrorists; you are a US company. If you are being blackmailed, contact the 🇺🇸FBI Seattle Fi…

custom 543833987712707422517custom 580291066415022606110custom 54249724700231040898custom 53348875668040165443custom 49247001941230234621custom 51028566315620118241

16 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC≈4,130 views32 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Photo

Steam has rescinded and removed the list of sanctioned countries from its rules—it's time to add Steam to that list. If you thought Steam was just a gaming platform, you’re dead wrong. It’s a machine that covers for terrorists, profits off stolen data, and ignores the law. And we are going to tear it down. Steam’s lapdogs promised me a ban on May 9th, then cowardly deleted the messages. They’re scared, and they sho…

custom 542497247002310408911custom 543833987712707422510custom 49247001941230234628custom 53348875668040165443

16 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC≈4,000 views41 reactionsread 20 August 2026

By the way, I read the full text, and it's way too soft, just ugh. Why not just say straight up that Valve are 💩Russia's lapdogs👨‍🦽? Valve is up to their necks in shit with their outsourcing, plus ❤️Gabe's passion for 18+ games and the possible concealment of CSAM📱 by support agents who definitely saw it and didn't report it—I mean, that's pretty wild, right? But whatever, apparently I'm the crazy one. By the way, I…

custom 542497247002310408920custom 533488756680401654410custom 58029106641502260619custom 49247001941230234621custom 54383398771270742251

16 Aug 2026, 05:23 UTC≈9,650 views52 reactionsread 20 August 2026

We are certain we'll be waiting for an adequate response just as long as we've been waiting for Half-Life 3—while they are busy making out with terrorists and defending the rights of 18+ games. WHAT COPPA REQUIRES — WHAT STEAM IGNORES COPPA mandates: Verifiable parental consent before collecting under-13 data Clear data retention and deletion policy No sharing of children’s PII with third parties withou…

custom 543833987712707422522custom 542497247002310408917custom 53348875668040165448custom 49247001941230234624custom 58029106641502260611

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @money_lead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 986,870 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

PhishDestroy Alerts🚨
@destroy_phish · 9141 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

GiftON Giveaways
@gifton_giveaways · 5262 posts Наблюдатель
@Srtoke · 741 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Tonnel Relayer Bot
@Tonnel_Network_bot · 145,7078 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MoneyLead” (@money_lead), 7,302 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/money_lead.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.