13 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC18 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel
沫沫（泡泡屋）
@momo_cp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004313933108 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @momo_cp |
| Created | 10 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/momo_cp |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 1 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:50 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4000.0%
- avg views ÷ 1 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 40.0
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 5 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (10 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 120 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 1
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 5s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
12 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC33 viewsread 14 August 2026
店铺：#泡泡屋 女仆：#沫沫 类型：#甜妹 出击人：#狂暴火龙果 出击时间：2025.08 环境： B，小区楼房（分为S,A,B,C四个等级） 人照相似度：人照9（例） 罩杯：胸b 身材：苗条 身高：158 体重：88 皮肤：很白，很弹，很滑 态度：S，尺度内很配合 聊天交流：A，很不错 敏感处: 下面（隔裤） 抽烟：无 纹身：无 唇钉舌钉：无 吻技：吻技不错，时间长，大蟒蛇。 过程： 前一天晚上看到摩卡瞬间心动，第二天预约头钟出发，进了房间，看到一个乖巧可爱的小女孩，3分钟破冰，06年的，刚20，第一次干这个，由于不怎么开荒，作为她第一个客人我是有点小心的，担心她吃不消，不过她说有思想准备，那还犹豫啥，开亲，身上很香，嘴巴很软，刚开始还有点放不开，慢慢进入状态后慢慢反客为主，比我能亲，，皮肤非常话，而且凉凉的，特别爽，手停不下来，熊b够用了，手顺势往下，不过只允许隔裤，特别敏感，不一会身体开始不自觉抽搐，内裤…
10 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC69 viewsread 14 August 2026
Video
#沫沫 标签：女大学生；素人； 服务：单钟超大 烟：× 酒：× 纹：× 测评
10 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTCviews —
Channel photo updated
10 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @momo_cp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,271,398 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“沫沫（泡泡屋）” (@momo_cp), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/momo_cp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.