Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net +120. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,187–1,351 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 21:01
1,332
+10
14 Sept 2026, 18:40
1,322
+11
11 Sept 2026, 07:18
1,311
-3
6 Sept 2026, 07:59
1,314
+88
2 Sept 2026, 04:44
1,226
-4
30 Aug 2026, 00:13
1,230
+4
27 Aug 2026, 03:52
1,226
+6
23 Aug 2026, 23:07
1,220
+11
20 Aug 2026, 02:33
1,209
-4
17 Aug 2026, 12:13
1,213
+7
14 Aug 2026, 09:27
1,206
-3
11 Aug 2026, 02:51
1,209
-4
8 Aug 2026, 01:40
1,213
+1
7 Aug 2026, 23:16
1,212
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:24
1,212
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
783 reactions across 5 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5323571762498137884
130
16.6%
custom 5323306080116175565
69
8.81%
custom 5323566707321631344
69
8.81%
custom 5323678346406552966
68
8.68%
custom 5231349670667642746
65
8.30%
custom 5395555216810613416
61
7.79%
custom 5447416732161431548
60
7.66%
custom 5228983070673102822
56
7.15%
custom 5323605039904748550
56
7.15%
custom 5188661209028648237
54
6.90%
custom 5242267194066229442
47
6.00%
custom 5384600116743143686
27
3.45%
custom 5190958625689975047
21
2.68%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 783 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
72
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 5 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @moments_withL. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 5 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤩 My favorite kind of luxury 🤩
В какой-то момент понимаешь, что лучший маршрут, тот, которого нет
Просто идти туда, где красиво🤍
Останавливаться там, где вкусно 🍝
И собирать моменты, которые уже никогда не получится повторить🙈
🌟Just another day in paradise 🌟
Утро — море 🌟
Днем — солнце и прогулки 🤩👡
Вечером — красивые места и бокал чего-нибудь холодного🍸
Кажется, идеальный summer mood найден 🌸
🤩Black dresses & Cannes nights✨
Мы вышли оттуда с мыслью: сюда точно хочется вернуться 🤩
Очень вкусно, красиво и какая-то невероятно легкая атмосфера
Из тех мест, где «просто ужин» незаметно превращается в долгий
вечер 🤩
📍La Môme, Cannes
🤩Happiness looks like this 🤩
Bonjour, Cannes 🤩
Впереди несколько дней солнца, вина, красивых мест и
девчачьих разговоров🍸🤩
По-моему, это лучшее спонтанное решение этого лета 🤍
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @moments_withL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙈𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙨 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙇 ♡” (@moments_withL), 1,332 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moments_withL.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.