3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 471–497 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 09:58
494
+20
8 Aug 2026, 04:35
474
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:17
474
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
122.3%
avg views ÷ 494 subscribers
Avg views / post
604
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 6 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held
6 (12 June 2026 – 31 July 2026)
Views total
604
Reactions total
18
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
115 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5222250043716688028
38
33.0%
custom 5278303786450849894
21
18.3%
custom 5253823138583586852
14
12.2%
custom 5393102511311711722
13
11.3%
custom 5325544453862085853
10
8.70%
custom 5253571870111864574
8
6.96%
custom 5269394241867511088
6
5.22%
custom 5397634865745133690
5
4.35%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вот уже 6-й год подряд мы выбираемся летом в какой-нибудь санаторий с мужем, ходим на разные процедуры с бабульками и отдыхаем от городской суеты .
Когда мы бронировали санаторий, я настоятельно убеждала мужа, что две недели пребывания - чересчур много. По итогу я бы не отказалась ещё недельку отдохнуть от бытовухи, но уже завтра мы пакуем чемоданы и предвкушаем ночной рейс домой 🤩
🤩 санаторий Источник, Ессентуки
Не поверите, но я впервые за 33 года решила отметить свой день рождения с девочками 🎂
Мне трудно ответить на вопрос, почему я не делала этого раньше, наверное, потому что в большей степени я - интроверт, но последние происходящие события рядом заставляют как-то пересмотреть свое отношение к жизни. Да и не хочется как-то в глубокой старости сожалеть о том, что в молодости я проживала этот день также, как и остальные …
Крайние дни отпуска в Москве были очень насыщенными: много гуляли, вкусно кушали, часами тусили в детских игровых и , конечно же, шопинг
А ещё как-то спонтанно купили авиабилеты и планируем новое путешествие, но только уже в пределах страны 🤩
📌ресторан Modus в историческом переулке района Плющихи (очень советую к посещению!)
Вчера за завтраком наша милая китаянка подарила Мире очаровательные украшения с ракушками на память со словами (написала на переводчике):
«Будь всегда такой веселой и жизнерадостной, как морские волны. Твоя старшая сестренка».
Мира засмущалась и попросила меня скорее все одеть ей, а я еле сдерживала слезы. Меня очень тронул этот добрый жест 💛
#мальдивы #отпуск #мале #maldives
С нами отдыхают очень милые китайцы, которые каааажждый день фотографируются с Мирой 😂 А сегодня они распечатали нам на память фотографии с Polaroid и за ужином уточнили номер нашей виллы, чтобы передать ей какой-то подарок 💔
А ещё я не перестаю удивляться тому, как они тщательно прячутся от солнца и какая у них белая кожа. Прилететь на Мальдивы и в такую жаркую погоду купаться одетыми вплоть до перчаток.. Хорошо, …
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @mom_miryy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 183,918 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Julia A.” (@mom_miryy), 494 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mom_miryy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
