Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MOLODIBOGAT🦄

Channel

MOLODIBOGAT🦄

@molodibogat_official

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

161,643subscribers

+8,892 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003827190135
TypeChannel
Username@molodibogat_official
DescriptionСтример, немного исполнитель (на 57%), филантроп и просто натурал. По вопросам и предложениям ЛС канала.
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/molodibogat_official

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

115,000 average views per post against 161,643 subscribers — an engagement rate of 71.0%. Across the 2,352 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,002–316,159 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.43% and 21.6%, with a median of 10.4%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (17 July 2026 16 August 2026)
Posts measured20 of 20 published in the window (0 exact, 20 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled2,293,900
Mature posts only71.0% over 20 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers161,643 measured 16 August 2026
Cohortb100000:rus · 2,352 channels · p10 2.04% · p25 4.43% · p50 10.4% · p75 21.6% · p90 36.0%
Position in cohort99.234th percentile · 6.8× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.185% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 16 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

149,757163,020156,388.57 August 2026 — 152,751 subscribers8 August 2026 — 150,738 subscribers9 August 2026 — 150,427 subscribers10 August 2026 — 149,757 subscribers11 August 2026 — 156,424 subscribers12 August 2026 — 163,020 subscribers13 August 2026 — 162,616 subscribers14 August 2026 — 162,176 subscribers16 August 2026 — 161,643 subscribers161,6437 August 202616 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 9 days, net +8,892. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 147,768–165,009 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 09:03161,643-533
14 Aug 2026, 23:15162,176-440
13 Aug 2026, 12:17162,616-404
12 Aug 2026, 11:33163,020+6,596
11 Aug 2026, 12:26156,424+6,667
10 Aug 2026, 14:44149,757-670
9 Aug 2026, 11:52150,427-311
8 Aug 2026, 09:42150,738-2,013
7 Aug 2026, 19:45152,751first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.9%
avg views ÷ 161,643 subscribers
Avg views / post
116,000
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held21 (17 July 202616 August 2026)
Views total2,206,900
Reactions total77,665
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8
Videos
1
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

79,132 reactions across 21 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 100.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🦄79,131100.0%
👎10.001%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79,132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC≈45,900 views3,181 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Здарова всем. Спасибо тем кто был вчера на стриме, ням-ням устроили немного да и в целом душевно посидели. Скоро новая неделя, а это значит новые идеи, новые стримы и прочее. А пока что я валяться, после свежего воздуха знаете ли не сильно хочется что-то делать 😂

🦄3,180👎1

15 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC≈83,900 views6,670 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Севоня.. в 17:00 по мск. ищите на твиче.. я верю в вас.

🦄6,670

7 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC≈94,600 views2,430 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Poll

Привет! Вы же поняли что кружок выше - это ии?:)

  1. Да16%
  2. Нет84%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🦄2,430

6 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC≈99,300 views3,840 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🦄3,840

5 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC≈102,000 views6,070 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Бля, на счет идеи о которой писал выше (для стрима), пока что идет все окей. Надеюсь что скоро реализуем, запущу и вместе чуть-чуть удивимся, ну или поржем, а может покринжуем… кто знает. В этом вся и суть. Еще так же будем продолжать шоу, ирл будет (на другом канале), ну и все по мелочи. Нужно к осени набрать обороты, чтобы в самый пик больше и больше удивлять. Но, загадывать не будем. Двигаемся аккуратно, но увер

🦄6,070

3 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC≈113,000 views5,270 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🦄5,270

2 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC≈82,200 views16,500 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Экспериментируют с тик током, разные мультики и прочее, изучаю то как заходит тот или иной контент. Интересно, но иногда так тупо, то видео на которое ставишь больше всего - набирает 500 просмотров, условно. Но, этим и интересно по сути. Глянем как будет дальше. ТТ не скину. Хочу посмотреть органику и алгоритмы, как будет работать без аудитории пришедшей с вне. Или ставьте много реакций, а я все же подумаю скинуть

🦄16,500

31 Jul 2026, 14:55 UTC≈118,000 views3,900 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🦄3,900

30 Jul 2026, 04:51 UTC≈125,000 views4,530 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Доброе утро, привет всем новым. Надеюсь понравится тут, хоть я и не часто выкладываю посты… хз что писать честно говоря. По стриму, где-то в пятницу-субботу ждите, почему бы и нет. Но посмотрю по ситуации. Может быть и в воскресенье… как карта ляжет хаха

🦄4,530

28 Jul 2026, 20:10 UTC≈141,000 views1,350 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Бля, скорее бы уже реализация той идеи со стримом. Вы будете просто шокированы форматом... Надеюсь все будет ок.

🦄1,350

28 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC≈133,000 views3,730 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Ну что могу сказать, стримом я вчера не доволен. Жара как-то действует, что туплю и прочее. Актива вы дали конечно, базара нет! Так держать. Следующий скорее всего к выходным будет. Там ближе уже напишу. Продолжаю продумывать и готовиться к самому интересному (как мне кажется стриму), но это будет не менее чем через неделю. Так что глянем чо как) Вам хорошего жаркого летнего дня 🦄

🦄3,730

27 Jul 2026, 04:33 UTC≈130,000 views5,000 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Доброго утра всем! Ну что, вот и понедельник. А я немного не выспался или выспался, но еще не проснулся, или проснулся но уже выспался, только сам не пойму. Короче, отстаньте) Хорошего дня вам! Сегодня стрим 🦄🦄🦄🦄

🦄5,000

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @molodibogat_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTCAnonymous Poll31,900 voters approx.

Привет! Вы же поняли что кружок выше - это ии?:)

  1. Да16%
  2. Нет84%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MOLODIBOGAT🦄” (@molodibogat_official), 161,643 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/molodibogat_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.