Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MOLCHANOV ARCHIVE

Channel

MOLCHANOV ARCHIVE

@molchanovarchive

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,889subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002441245377
TypeChannel
Username@molchanovarchive
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/molchanovarchive

Growth

1,8891,9151,9027 August 2026 — 1,915 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,915 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,909 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,898 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,889 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,885–1,919 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 16:291,889-9
14 Aug 2026, 12:271,898-11
11 Aug 2026, 01:251,909-6
7 Aug 2026, 18:211,915no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:031,915first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 19 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

287 reactions across 8 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54160977833943566718830.7%
custom 51997176703242871335218.1%
custom 52354777226496091123913.6%
custom 51950638241509720673813.2%
custom 52197877131960804263311.5%
custom 5240262165893507524103.48%
🤩93.14%
🤯82.79%
❤‍🔥41.39%
custom 526931440701541780231.05%
31.05%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 287reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 2 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Apr 2026, 09:48 UTC≈1,500 views89 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📌Призы отправлены победителям📌 ☝️Дайте связь ниже ☝️ ДЕЛАЕМ ЕЩЕ РОЗЫГРЫШИ??? 🍒 - да! 🍓 - нет! 💪 - делаем перерыв! ⚽️ - ждём лучше обнову!

custom 541609778339435667173custom 52402621658935075247custom 52354777226496091125custom 51950638241509720672custom 51997176703242871332

29 Mar 2026, 09:28 UTC≈2,050 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

‼️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️🅱️‼️ Банда, только ВАШ голос, поможет в продвижении развития канала ❤️ Буду рад если поддержите голосом 🍒 https://t.me/boost/molchanovarchive

custom 523547772264960911212custom 54160977833943566719custom 51950638241509720674custom 52693144070154178023custom 52402621658935075242custom 51997176703242871331

23 Mar 2026, 14:00 UTC≈22,800 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎁РОЗЫГРЫШ ЗАВЕРШЕН🎁 1 МЕСТО - Куртка Stone island Jacket Reps 2 МЕСТО - C.P Company Google Chrome-R 3 МЕСТО - Hoodie Nike 4 МЕСТО - Hoodie Nike 5 МЕСТО - Панама Ellesse 6 МЕСТО - Панама Ellesse 7 МЕСТО - Socks Ellesse ⏰ИТОГИ 01.04.2026 В 20:00 ПО МСК ВРЕМЕНИ ✨Желаем всем удачи - она на вашей стороне🍀 ‼️УСПЕЙТЕ ПРИНЯТЬ УЧАСТИЕ‼️

custom 523547772264960911222custom 519506382415097206711custom 51997176703242871337custom 54160977833943566716🤩5custom 52402621658935075241

19 Mar 2026, 18:04 UTC≈2,280 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всех приветствую 👋 📌Огромная просьба друзья распространить данный пост❗️ 📌Поддержите репостом данный пост у себя в канале, отправьте друзьям и так далее❗️ Вы спросите почему не было итогов последнего розыгрыша, пожалуйста, вот данная информация выше ☝️ Данный человек после публикации поста на ЧЕРНЫЙ СПИСОК начал чистку переписки, удаление материала с куфара и в целом чистки данных пруфов на его 🤷‍♀️

custom 519506382415097206710custom 51997176703242871335custom 52197877131960804265🤩2

19 Mar 2026, 18:01 UTC≈6,490 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❌НЕЛЬЗЯ ДОВЕРЯТЬ - SCAM❌ ❌ SEVCHEK STORE / Sevchekk ❌ Проводит сомнительные наборы на подставные гивы , обманывает людей (Спонсоров) на деньги, проводит СКАМ-розыгрыши через своего личного бота (@WinGiveBot). Тем самым, подставляет фейк-победителей (своих ботов) в розыгрыш и таким образом забирает себе все призовые позиции, купленные на розыгрыш за спонсорские денежные средства. А Со всей информацией ознакомиться

🤯6❤‍🔥4custom 51950638241509720674custom 51997176703242871334

19 Mar 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,440 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Швыр от SEVCHEK STORE / Sevchekk Что говорит пострадавший: Проводит сомнительные наборы на подставные гивы , обманывает людей (Спонсоров) на деньги, проводит СКАМ-розыгрыши через своего личного бота (@WinGiveBot). Тем самым, подставляет фейк-победителей (своих ботов) в розыгрыш и таким образом забирает себе все призовые позиции, купленные на розыгрыш за спонсорские денежные средства. А Со всей информацией ознакомит

🤯21custom 52197877131960804261

19 Feb 2026, 12:19 UTC≈4,450 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📌Шапка C.P Company 😎 ⏺Size: os ⏺Condition: отличное ⏺Price: 249 BYN 🇧🇾 Доп.фото и информация ⬇️ Писать в TG: @CYETTOLOGG ✍️ Писать в ☝️ Instagram ☝️

custom 519971767032428713325custom 521978771319608042611custom 51950638241509720675🤩2

19 Feb 2026, 07:38 UTC≈3,370 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📌Adidas Futurepacer reflective 👕 ❌❌❌❌❌

custom 521978771319608042616custom 519971767032428713382custom 51950638241509720672

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @molchanovarchive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 77,214 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MOLCHANOV ARCHIVE” (@molchanovarchive), 1,889 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/molchanovarchive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.