❕не знаю есть ли тут еще кто-то , но все же не могу пройти мимо и прошу вас подписать петицию, это занимает меньше минуты , но имеет большое значение !! не забудьте использовать впн

Channel
🔒mokaccino ✸
@mokalitt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
35subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002501706747 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mokalitt |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 10 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mokalitt |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 35 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 36 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 36 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 10 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 42s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
127 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5193055712191739873 | 42 | 33.1% | |
| custom 5377841994292819446 | 41 | 32.3% | |
| custom 5213097352444798293 | 36 | 28.3% | |
| custom 5472089060124157859 | 8 | 6.30% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2025 to 11 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔒закрыто ! в этот раз уже точно. я думаю вы и сами заметили что я редко появляюсь, выкладываю далеко не все обновления, у меня сейчас не так много времени на этот канал и желание пропало совсем. актив также стал намного хуже, о реакциях на постах мне даже просить неудобно ( 😭 ) , куча отписок, мотивации совершенно нет. я вела это канал почти 4 месяца и очень благодарна вам за все реакции, звездочки это все очень рад…
custom 519305571219173987323
ㅤ 25O711 #report ♡ ‼️ жалуемся на данный аккаунт в hybe portal, так как он обвиняет айлит в плагиате шаблон: — title: ILLIT ACCUSED OF PLAGIATISM — contents: The original artist admitted they took inspiration from Nintendo, but now they’re accusing ILLIT of copying them. Please review this and protect ILLIT from false plagiarism claims. — post url: https://x.com/l_auzza/status/1943634624552313048?s=46 — post autho…
custom 53778419942928194466
straw - buh - buh - buh - buh - berry shortcake, I know a girl 🤩there is no one sweeter 🤩beside_moka
custom 51930557121917398739custom 52130973524447982936custom 53778419942928194464
もか 🤩╱ ww . tiktok,11月7日 ▫️« nice to meet you »
custom 51930557121917398736custom 52130973524447982934custom 53778419942928194462
もか 🤩 ╱ ww . twitter,11月7日
custom 52130973524447982935custom 51930557121917398734custom 53778419942928194463
もか 🤩╱ww . weverse,11月7日 ▫️( 🤩 ) : jellyous🧡
custom 54720890601241578598custom 52130973524447982934custom 53778419942928194464
I LOVE MY BABY SO SO MUCH 😭😭
custom 53778419942928194467custom 52130973524447982935
もか ╱ ww . tiktok,10月7日 « jellyous » w/ kai ( txt ) !
custom 53778419942928194468custom 52130973524447982936
もか ╱ ww . instagram,10月7日
custom 53778419942928194467custom 52130973524447982936
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @mokalitt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@mokalitt named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔒mokaccino ✸” (@mokalitt), 35 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mokalitt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.