#1V1 #一对一 #小骚货 #爸爸 #裸聊 #78188 刚看了个极品高颜值小骚货1V1裸聊,舔手指样子好淫荡,小舌头一动一动的,最后喊着让爸爸射嘴里,漏点露脸尺度大,稳8分,骚得要命。
👍2❤1

Channel
@mojian3
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
116,762subscribers
-2,763 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001808894098 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mojian3 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mojian3 |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 116,762 | +3,457 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 113,305 | -338 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:22 | 113,643 | -231 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 113,874 | -273 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 114,147 | -232 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:02 | 114,379 | -328 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 114,707 | -428 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 115,135 | -280 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 115,415 | -160 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:32 | 115,575 | -138 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 115,713 | -147 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 115,860 | -159 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 116,019 | -149 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 116,168 | -212 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 116,380 | -132 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 116,512 | -125 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 116,637 | -123 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 116,760 | -132 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 116,892 | -291 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 117,183 | first reading |
339 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 95 of 171 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 339 (5 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 55,308 |
| Reactions total | 150 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Sept 2026, 10:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 125 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
236 reactions across 157 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 200 | 84.7% | |
| ❤ | 35 | 14.8% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.424% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 162 of the 339 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 236 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 339 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#1V1 #一对一 #小骚货 #爸爸 #裸聊 #78188 刚看了个极品高颜值小骚货1V1裸聊,舔手指样子好淫荡,小舌头一动一动的,最后喊着让爸爸射嘴里,漏点露脸尺度大,稳8分,骚得要命。
👍2❤1
#1V1 #一对一 #反差 #淫语诱惑 #78187 这个长发邻家姐姐的淫语诱惑真带劲,幻想坐在小哥哥身上一个劲地扭动,骚话不断不停问爽不爽,反差感拉得满满的,颜值贼高还露脸,尺度一般不漏点。
👍2
#1V1 #一对一 #小母狗 #少妇 #母狗 #诱惑 #78186 高颜值风骚少妇变小母狗,跪下求舔:“宝贝的鸡巴真好吃,我跪下给你舔大鸡巴好么”一对一做爱视频对白淫荡,漏点露脸尺度大真诱惑
👍2
#1V1 #一对一 #反差 #小母狗 #母狗 #自慰 #诱惑 #78185 这顶级颜值身材的反差小母狗真带劲,一对一自慰诱惑金主,呻吟声骚气十足,漏点露脸尺度大,高颜值评7分,受不了。
👍2
#1V1 #一对一 #网红脸 #自慰 #裸聊 #78184 网红脸小姐姐1V1视频裸聊太带感,一边看着爸爸的鸡巴一边用震动棒抽插自己的小穴,颜值超高还露脸漏点,尺度大得很
👍3
#1V1 #一对一 #自慰 #视频做爱 #78183 啧这高颜值小姐姐视频做爱太冲了,假鸡巴自慰边喊小哥哥干死她,最后掰开小穴给人看,漏点露脸尺度大,稳8分。
👍4
Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_5944134484
👍1
#1V1 #一对一 #女仆 #母狗 #琳琳 #78182 知名主播琳琳儿穿上女仆装一对一1V1挑逗你,心甘情愿做你的小母狗,颜值高露脸不漏点,尺度一般稳8分。
👍1
#1V1 #一对一 #乳交 #反差 #78181 微胖极品美女挤奶乳交真带感,隔空抠逼和小哥哥一起高潮,漏点露脸颜值还可以,反差一对一1V1尺度一般但超有画面,给你个6分。
👍1
#1V1 #一对一 #制服 #反差 #78180 发现个小美女一对一制服诱惑,颜值确实能打,脸露得清楚不漏点,尺度虽比较小但足够撩人有反差,看着就心动,评分6分完全够得上。
👍2
#反差 #榨精 #78179 刚刷到这个极品大奶小骚货视频聊骚,1V1盯着射榨精,边揉着奶子边舔肉棒,反差感直接拉满,颜值高露脸还不漏点真带劲
🌈全网服务最好,性价比最高的裸聊店⬇️ https://t.me/+Lt87FeYVCGBkYjdl
Showing the 12 most recent of 339 posts we hold for @mojian3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“高颜值裸聊直播社区” (@mojian3), 116,762 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mojian3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.