Channel
@mojeze_eshghe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,784subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001535768825 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mojeze_eshghe |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mojeze_eshghe |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:22 | 2,784 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 2,788 | -6 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 2,794 | +6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:55 | 2,788 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 2,790 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 2,791 | no change |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 2,791 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 August 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,428 |
| Reactions total | 345 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
398 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 127 | 31.9% | |
| 👍 | 106 | 26.6% | |
| 👏 | 66 | 16.6% | |
| 👌 | 22 | 5.53% | |
| 🙏 | 18 | 4.52% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 3.77% | |
| 💔 | 9 | 2.26% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 2.26% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 1.76% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 1.76% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 1.26% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.754% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.503% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.251% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.251% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 398 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اما عزیز من، دوست داشتنِ آدمها یعنی خواستنشان همانطور که واقعاً هستند؛ با تمام تیرگیها، زیباییها، زخمها، چین و چروکها و شکستگیهایشان… با تمام چیزهایی که پشت سر گذاشتهاند! 🌱🤌❤️ @mojeze_eshghe
❤4👍2👏2
⭕️ همه قرار نیست رفیق باشن. یکی همکار خوبیه یکی هم صحبت خوبیه یکی پایه سفره یکی فقط وقتی اوضاع می ریزه به هم بلده کنارت وایسه ما یه تصور عجیب از رابطه داریم اگه رفیقمه باید زیاد ببینمش زیاد پیام بدیم تولد هم باشیم جمعه ها همدیگه رو پیدا کنیم. انگار رفاقت پکیج اینترنت نامحدوده. در حالی که بعضی آدم ها اصلاً برای وقت گذرونی ساخته نشدن. ولی ساعت ۲ نصف شب زنگ بزنی و بگی داداش یه مشکلی پیش اومده ... قبل از اینکه توضیح بد…
👏4❤2👍2💯1
صدای جنگل و طبیعت برای کاهش استرس و خواب راحت آرام باشی همیشه ای روح زیبا ☘️🕊 @mojeze_eshghe
❤14🕊1😍1🙏1
زندگی رو نذار برای وقتی که همه چیز سر جاش قرار گرفت. گاهی باید با همین زندگی ناقص، سفر کرد، خندید، دوست داشت و زندگی کرد... 🌱❤️🤌 @mojeze_eshghe
💯10👍5👏3❤2
شکر پروردگار را برای نوری که در تاریکترین لحظهها به قلبمان تاباند. شکر پروردگار را برای دستهای پنهانی که همواره پشتیبان ما بودند. شکر پروردگار را برای آرزوهایی که با حکمتش جابهجا کرد تا خیر ما رقم بخورد. شکر پروردگار را برای توان و قوتی که برای ایستادگی به ما بخشید. شکر پروردگار را برای سقفی که بر سر داریم و نانی که بر سفرهمان نهاد. شکر پروردگار را در هر نفس و در هر تپش قلب. 🌱❤️ @mojeze_eshghe
🙏14❤10👍3👌1
قرار نیست کسی نجاتم دهد، خودم باید خودم را نجات دهم. حتی باید خودم را از دست خودم نجات بدهم و خودم را وادارم که گامهای کوچکی به جلو بردارم، همهی روز، هر روز و حتی وقتی حسوحالش را ندارم... 📚 کتاب : #فرضیه_دل_آسودگی ✍️ اثر : #مل_رابینز 🌱🤌❤️ @mojeze_eshghe
❤10👏5👍4🥰1
نوشت: دلم عمیقاً یه روز آروم و بی دغدغه می خواد که بدون صدای آلارم بیدار شم، فکرم مشغول گذشته و آینده نباشه و با خیال راحت چاییمو بخورم، دوستامو دعوت کنم خونه و ناهارو باهم بپزیم و دور هم حرف بزنیم و بخندیم، عصر بریم کافه و بدون فکر مشغول خوردن قهوه و مکالمه های عمیق باشیم، شب بی توجه به این که فردا چیکار دارم درگیر انتخاب کردن فیلم ترسناک باشم که وقتی پیتزا میرسه بذارمش باهم ببینیم، و تا آخر شب از ترس خوابمون نبره…
👏10😢6❤3👍2
⭕️ چرا رابطهای که هیچوقت کامل شروع نمیشه، گاهی از یک رابطهی تمامشده سختتر فراموش میشه؟! @mojeze_eshghe 👤روانشناس ؛ ریحانه درخشان
❤5👍3👌2
یه جا خوندم : عشق واقعی ؛ امنیت میده نه اضطراب دائمی .... ❤️🩹🤌 @mojeze_eshghe
👍11👏4👌2💔2
نوشته بود : این روزا حسادت، شکل تازهای به خودش گرفته دیگه فقط پول، ماشین یا خونه نیست که بعضیها رو به حسادت میندازه. گاهی چیزی که بیشتر از هر داراییای آزارشون میده، شخصیت توئه؛ آرامشت، اعتمادبهنفست، محبوبیتی که بین آدمها داری، رابطههای سالمت یا نوری که با حضورت به هر جمعی میبخشی. برای بعضی آدمها، دیدنِ کسی که با خودش در صلحه و حالِ خوبی داره، از دیدنِ ثروتِ دیگران هم سختتره. چون پول رو شاید بشه به دست…
❤18👍5👌4👏4
آنتون چخوف: " آدمهای گستاخ اغلب پیروز میشوند؛ چون آدمهای عاقل به خاطر آرامش خود به آنها باج میدهند ! " 🌱🌺 @mojeze_eshghe
👏15💔5👍4👌3
به نظرتون چی باعث شده که زندگیشون اینقدر بادوام و عاشقانه باشه؟ 😍🤌❤️ @mojeze_eshghe
❤13👏4👍3😍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mojeze_eshghe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“mojeze_eshgh معجزه عشق❣️” (@mojeze_eshghe), 2,784 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mojeze_eshghe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.