Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мои отзывы

Channel

Мои отзывы

@moiotzizmazurenko

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

5subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003192095696
TypeChannel
Username@moiotzizmazurenko
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 29 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/moiotzizmazurenko

Growth

58 August 2026 — 5 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5 subscribers8 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–6 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:475no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:335first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 29 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
23
Videos
16
Links
18

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
9m 40s
Average length
1m 04s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

130 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5139.2%
4232.3%
🔥3728.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2025 to 26 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Mar 2026, 17:09 UTC6 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

Отзыв клиента. Твоя внутренняя работа меняет не только тебя,но и мужчину рядом 🌸С любовью Ваша Ксения

26 Jan 2026, 12:36 UTC16 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

Отзыв клиента 💎 Услуги| Кейсы| Забота

30 Nov 2025, 22:42 UTC29 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

Когда я пришла к Ксении, я была полностью опустошена. Я не видела опоры ни в прошлом, ни в будущем — казалось, что всё внутри замерло и жизнь остановилась. Работа с ней стала переломным моментом. Я увидела, что мой опыт и мои достижения — это то, чем стоит гордиться, потому что всё это сделала я сама. Постепенно ушли бесконечные сожаления и чувство вины, я перестала бесконечно себя ругать за решения, которые когда-то

30 Nov 2025, 22:28 UTC22 viewsread 13 August 2026

Сбылась моя мечта Спасибо большое Ксении,за работу со мной ❤️

30 Nov 2025, 22:24 UTC21 viewsread 13 August 2026

Хочу поделиться результатами работы с Ксенией.❤️ В апреле мне сообщили о множестве полипах в матке. Это было тревожно, но мы начали работать с Ксенией, шаг за шагом разбирая и тело, и внутренние состояния. И вот в октябре я получаю новые результаты — осталось всего одно маленькое образование. Как будто вместе с облегчением в теле открылось пространство для движения в жизни: желания, пусть небольшие, начали сбываться

30 Nov 2025, 13:32 UTC20 viewsread 13 August 2026
File

С Ксенией мы знакомы с 2021 года, и именно к ней я пришла в самый трудный момент — когда искала путь к восстановлению после онкологического диагноза. Мы работали через глубинные подсознательные слои и метафорические карты, и уже через две недели результаты стали ощутимыми. Вторая опухоль ушла, состояние стабилизировалось, тело перестало жить в постоянном напряжении. Каждое утро после занятий я чувствовала, как внутр

30 Nov 2025, 13:11 UTC17 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

Всем доброго дня. Хочу выразить искреннюю благодарность Ксении за готовность взяться за работу со мной. Я пришёл к ней в состоянии подавленности, с ощущением, что снова и снова хожу по одному и тому же кругу. В отношениях тоже было немало сложных моментов. Ксения провела глубокую и очень точную работу. За короткое время мне стало легче дышать, а состояние выровнялось. Вижу реальные изменения в личной жизни — многое

29 Nov 2025, 21:30 UTC18 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

Привет, меня зовут Сергей. Хочу поделиться своим опытом работы с Ксенией Мазуренко. Вчера у меня прошла первая проработка, и я пришёл с важным запросом — научиться брать ответственность за свою жизнь и собственные поступки.✨ Во время сессии Ксения аккуратно, но очень точно вывела на поверхность несколько моих внутренних блоков. За одну встречу удалось разобрать сразу четыре–пять глубоких убеждений, которые годами

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @moiotzizmazurenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мои отзывы” (@moiotzizmazurenko), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moiotzizmazurenko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.