@mohamd14144 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
@mohamd1416 held 7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026
Growth
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,455–1,464 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 23:16
1,456
-7
8 Aug 2026, 05:48
1,463
+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:01
1,462
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:41
1,462
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.1%
avg views ÷ 1,456 subscribers
Avg views / post
279
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
18 (13 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
4,180
Reactions total
158
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
974
Videos
340
Links
920
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
6m 52s
Average length
1m 43s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
200 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 6041748276447809185
68
34.0%
❤
66
33.0%
😢
45
22.5%
custom 6044034994345611508
14
7.00%
👍
7
3.50%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 200reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
تساءلنا يوم نشر هذه المادة لمطاردة عناصر القسام لناقلة الجند الإسرائيلية، لماذا خرج هؤلاء بأسلحة رشاشة لمواجهة ناقلة الجند، والخطورة عالية على حياتهم ، والمنطق يقول بان هذه الأسلحة لن تكون ذات جدوى في المواجهة..
لتجيب لنا المشاهد التي نشرتها كتائب القسام اليوم ، بأنه كان بحوزتهم عبوة عمل فدائي لاصقة، وحاولوا الصاقها لكن يبدو أن خللا حدث معهم منع من الصاق العبوة بالناقلة وتفجيرها وتدميرها..
للعلم العدو اعترف حينها أ…
سبيلان ونهجان
في عام 2000 اشتركت للمرة الأولى في مجلة البيان الصادرة عن المنتدى الإسلامي، وكان الاشتراك السنوي بكلفة 15 جنيهًا، أي العدد الشهري بجنيه ونصف. وتميزت بأنها كانت مجلة متنوعة تغطي أبوابًا دعوية وتربوية وسياسية وإخبارية وفكرية، لذا كنت أقرأ العدد كاملًا، من المقدمة إلى آخر صفحة.
ومن بين المقالات التي أتذكرها حتى اليوم، مقالًا مطولًا يتحدث عن "البركة"، وأسباب تحصيلها شرعيًا ودنيويًا، وهذا المقال قرأته آنذا…
(إنَّ قُلوبَ بَني آدَمَ كُلَّها بينَ إصبَعَينِ مِن أصابِعِ الرَّحمَنِ، كَقَلبٍ واحِدٍ، يُصَرِّفُه حَيثُ يَشاءُ)
إذا أردت أن تعرف معنى هذا الحديث بواقعنا المعاصر، فانظر إلى حال العميل #غسان_الدهيني ...
هذا العميل كان يعطي الدورس في أحد مساجد رفح ...!!
والان .... الفيديو بالأعلى يشرح
(اللَّهمَّ مُصَرِّفَ القُلوبِ، صَرِّفْ قُلوبَنا على طاعَتِكَ)
يُروى عن الإمام الفضيل بن عياض -رحمه الله- قوله الشهير في التكلف مع الأخوان والضيوف:
«إنما يتقاطع الناس بالتكلف؛ يزور أحدهم أخاه فيتكلف له، فيقطعه ذلك عنه.»
ويبقى إحساس الأم هو الإحساس الذي لايخيب ..!!
موبايل أحد الشهداء تتصل عليه أمه لكن لا مجيب بهذه الحياة الدنيا، والاجابة إن شاء الله سوف تجدها الأم يوم القيامة يوم شفاعة ابنها البار لها..
⚠️بكلمات تقطع القلوب... شقيق الشهيد القائد أدهم نسمان "أبو راتب" يرثي أخاه وعائلته، الذين ارتقوا إثر استهدافهم عصر الأمس.
مشهد موجع يختصر حجم الفقد والألم
https://t.me/+R7N5y5fxHcpmMWM6
أمريكا تستعرض قدراتها العسكرية لضرب أهداف إيرانية انطلاقاً من الأراضي الكويتية هل تظنون أن نشر هذا الفيديو جاء مصادف لا والذي رفع السماء بلا عمد فما يحدث ليس عبثاً .
إلى هذا الحد بلغ الذل والخنوع في دول الخليج إن كل ما شُيد من أمن واستقرار سينهار إذا لم تدركوا ما يُحاك لكم فمن يتمركز على أرضكم ويحوّلها إلى ساحة صراع لا يحميكم ، إنما يجعل مصالحكم وأمنكم رهينة لمشاريعه، وما يسعى إليه في النهاية هو الحفاظ على نفوذه ومصا…
من أقسى ما قرأت لشيخنا الشهيد نائل مصران:
"غزة ما عادت تنتظر أحداً، والله حسبها وحسبنا فيكم أجمعين، واللهَ نسأل أن يذيقكم مرّ الخذلان القريب، فلا النبي عزرتم، ولا المسجد الأقصى نصرتم، ولا الدم المسفوك أيقظ فيكم حمية أبي جهل -على الأقل- وكنتم قوماً بُلداء لا دمَ في وجوهكم، ولا روح في أجسادكم المنتفخة، أكّالون بطّالون عطّالون !!!!
https://t.me/+R7N5y5fxHcpmMWM6
😢8custom 60417482764478091856
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mohamd14144. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,074,066 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محمد إبراهيم #طوفان_الأقصى” (@mohamd14144), 1,456 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mohamd14144.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
