کانال آموزش سئو 🔝
من معین هستم؛ سئوکار سابق دیجیکالا.
اینجا تجربههای واقعی سئو را کوتاه، ساده و قابل اجرا به اشتراک میگذارم.
هم یاد میگیرم، هم یاد میدهم
🔸راه ارتباطی : @moeenhoseiny
Created
Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 224–226 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 10:20
225
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:32
225
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
39.1%
avg views ÷ 225 subscribers
Avg views / post
88.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
9.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held
20 (29 September 2025 – 24 July 2026)
Views total
88
Reactions total
8
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
14
Videos
1
Links
30
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
69 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
61
88.4%
❤
5
7.25%
🔥
3
4.35%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2025 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
خیلی دارم فکر میکنم که اگر یک کار توی سئو اگر بکنم که بیشترین نتیجه رو روی کارم میزاره چیه ؟
چندین بار به این جواب رسیدم : کاری که الان باید بکنی رو برای فردا نزار
خیلی از جاهایی که افسوس خوردم برای پروژه ها موضوعش دیر انجام شدن یک سری کار ها بود
درسته تهش کارو دراوردم و بهترین نتیجه هارو دادم به کلاینت ها ولی یک استرس الکی خیلی اوقات کنارم بوده
توی این تایم جنگ و بعدش خیلی روی این مهارت کار کردم که این اشتباهمو کاه…
ما واقعاً همه در یک کشتی هستیم؛
کشتیای که این روزها بیشتر شبیه یک آبکش شده تا یک وسیله پیشران.
در این مدت پیامها و تماسهای زیادی برای مشاوره در زمینهی پیادهسازی Multi-Location، GeoDNS، تنظیمات Cloudflare و راهکارهای مشابه داشتم؛
همه با یک دغدغه مشترک: چطور سئو سایتمان را در این شرایط نجات بدهیم؟
به این نتیجه رسیدم که در چنین شرایطی، تنها کاری که از دستم برمیآید «کمک به همه» است.
بهجای صرف زمان برای مشاور…
🧊 توی سئو، منظور از pogo-sticking چیه؟
تا حالا شده توی گوگل، روی رتبه ۱ سرپ کلیک کنید ولی از محتوا خوشتون نیاد و کمتر از ۵ ثانیه برگردید و برید سراغ لینک بعد؟
این رفتار رو بهش میگیم pogo-sticking که مستقیماً روی UX سایت و سئو تاثیر منفی میذاره.
❓پوگو استیکینگ با Bounce Rate چه فرقی داره؟
توی نرخ پرش یا همون bounce rate کاربر صفحه رو میبنده ولی توی حالت پوگو استیکینگ به سرپ گوگل برمیگرده تا روی سایت رقیب کلیک کن…
❗️بهینهسازی تصاویر، فقط Alt گذاشتن نیست!
خیلی از سئوکارها، وقتی بحث سئوی تصویر میشه، فقط به فکر پر کردن آلت تصویر میافتن. ولی ما با تصاویر، کارهای خیلی بیشتری میتونیم بکنیم تا مستقیماً روی رتبهگرفتنمون توی Google Images و بهبود سرعت سایت تاثیر بذاره.
📝 این چکلیست رو بخون و رعایتش کن تا هم رتبههات بهتر شن، هم سرعت سایتت نابود نشه:
1⃣ نامگذاری فایل تصاویر رو جدی بگیر.
اسم فایل اولین پالس رو به گوگل میده.
م…
🥁 نباید لینکسازی داخلی انقدر برات عادی بشه که اصولی انجامدادنش یادت بره!
در اکثر مواقع یک سایتی که لینکدهی داخلی سازمانیافته و مرتبی داره بیشتر از رقیبی که دو سه برابر بیشتر لینکسازی داخلی انجام داده اما اصولی نیست، ترافیک ارگانیک جذب میکنه.
🔍 پس این اشتباهات در لینکسازی داخلی و راهحلهاشون رو برای یادآوری بخون تا بدونی گوگل چطور بهتر میتونه سایتت رو کرال و ایندکس کنه و بهش رتبه بده:
🔸 اشتباه: استفاده…
سئوی معنایی (Semantic SEO)؛ تنها روش رتبه و اعتبار گرفتن
👁🗨 فکر میکنید چرا رعایت Semantic SEO این روزها انقدر مهمتر شده؟
گوگل و هوش مصنوعیهای جدید (LLMs) دیگه مثل قبل فقط دنبال کلمات کلیدیِ اگزکت نیستن، بیشتر میخوان بفهمن که محتوای شما واقعاً درباره چه موضوعیه و چه مفاهیمی رو پوشش داده.
📊 پس هدف اصلی سئو الان چیه؟
دیگه صرفاً رتبه گرفتن نیست، تمرکز روی نحوهی نمایش برنده. اینکه آیا برند شمل منبعی معتبر و ق…
🔎 آیا طول محتوا برای AI Overviews مهمه؟
وقتشه که وسواس به تعداد کلمات رو برای تولید محتوا کنار بذارید.
سایت معتبر Ahrefs یک مطالعه انجام داده روی ۱۷۴ هزار صفحه که توی پاسخهای AI Overview گوگل نقل شدن. این مطالعه یک تفکر رایج در مورد سئو و طول محتوا رو رد میکنه.
🔑 مهمترین نکاتی که از این مطالعه فهمیدن:
📌 تعداد کلمه دیگه معیار نیست: طول محتوا عامل اصلی برای نقلقول شدن صفحهتون توی AI Overviews نیست. هم محتواهای…
🪄 اهمیت اسکیما برای دیدهشدن در AI Overviews
قابلیت AI Overviews گوگل مستقیماً از محتوای ما تغذیه میکنه و وظیفه ما اینه که «غذا» رو لقمه و آماده دهانش کنیم. اگه دادههامون ساختار نداشته باشن، هوش مصنوعی محتوای ما رو نادیده میگیره و میره سراغ رقیبی که اطلاعاتش رو واضح و تمیز داده!
چرا اسکیما انقدر حیاتیه؟
1⃣ اسکیما مثل یک هایلایتر برای ربات AI عمل میکنه و میگه: "این، جواب سؤاله؛ نویسنده معتبره و این هم تاریخ ا…
پست اینستاگرامیمون در مورد #سئو_لوکاله اگر نکاتشو میخوای برو اونجا و کامنت کن لوکال برات یک ویس ارسال میشه هفت موردی که باید حواست باشه بهشون رو گفتم اونجا
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DR-Md6xiMNC/?igsh=N2htZXI5ZzM2dnF1
یکم دوز فعالیت تو کانالو زیاد کنیم
از پرسش و پاسخ شروع کنیم
هر سوال سئویی دارین بپرسین از آیدیم تو کانال پاسخ میدمش
@moeenhoseiny
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @moeenseo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@moeenseo named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@mashhadbestadmin named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@moeenhoseiny named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آموزش سئو همراه با معین حسینی” (@moeenseo), 225 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moeenseo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.