#модно_тренд_лето2026_асимметрия Асимметрия не выходит из 👏👏👏👏👏 моды. Увидели интересный вариант у SPORTMAX SPRING SUMMER 2026.
🔥17🎉11❤9👍9👏8

Channel
@modno2025
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
2,936subscribers
-182 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002126114524 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @modno2025 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/modno2025 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
4.8 average views per post against 2,936 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.162%. Across the 54,164 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 10.5% and 35.6%, with a median of 20.1%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 20 of 20 published in the window (20 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 95 |
| Mature posts only | 0.162% over 20 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 2,936 measured 11 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b1000:rus · 54,164 channels · p10 5.33% · p25 10.5% · p50 20.1% · p75 35.6% · p90 57.1% |
| Position in cohort | 0.798th percentile · 1/125 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.098% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 2,936 | -127 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 3,063 | -55 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 3,118 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 95 |
| Reactions total | 1,877 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,877 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 382 | 20.4% | |
| 🎉 | 381 | 20.3% | |
| ❤ | 376 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 369 | 19.7% | |
| 👏 | 369 | 19.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,877reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#модно_тренд_лето2026_асимметрия Асимметрия не выходит из 👏👏👏👏👏 моды. Увидели интересный вариант у SPORTMAX SPRING SUMMER 2026.
🔥17🎉11❤9👍9👏8
#модно_тренд_осень2026_вишневыйцвет_плащ_тренч_burberry На дворе лето, но многие уже задумываются про осень. И как тут не вспомнить про плащ-тренч! А именно его укороченную версию — это хит сезона. Нашли у BURBERRY AUTUMN 2026 CAMPAIGN. Модный цвет вишни 🍒🍒🍒🍒🍒подойдет всем, кто любит и ценит классику.
👍28🔥28🎉26👏25❤23
#модно_тренд_лето2026_бантики_dior Еще один актуальный вариант от DIOR SPRING SUMMER 2026: черный 🎀🎀🎀🎀 бант на черной блузке. Шик!
👍11🎉8❤6👏3🔥3
#модно_тренд_лето2026_бантики_dior Бант у горловины — популярный вариант. Это может быть мягкий 🎀🎀🎀🎀бант-галстук или аккуратный, маленький, лаконичный бантик. Однотонные — наиболее эленантные. Как у DIOR SPRING SUMMER 2026.
❤25🔥24👍20👏20🎉19
#модно_тренд_лето2026_бантики_dior Наша тема сегодня — бантики. Актуально! Посмотрите, как бант использован в коллекции DIOR SPRING SUMMER 2026. Банты 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀уже заполонили собой гардеробы модниц, превратившись в главный элемент декора этого лета. Они украшают не только вечерние платья, блузки, но и корсеты, топы, юбки, даже шорты.
🎉40👏32❤24🔥23👍21
#модно_тренд_лето2026_желтый_carven Второй цвет, на который стоит обратить внимание, жизнерадостный 💛💛💛💛💛 желтый. Его тоже немало. Хорошо смотрится с серым. Нашли актуальное сочетание у CARVEN RESORT 2027 LOOKBOOK.
🎉29❤26👍24👏23🔥16
#модно_тренд_лето2026_prada_зеленый Полное озеленение! К такому выводу мы пришли, просматривая коллекции разных брендов. В том числе PRADA SPRING SUMMER 2026 FASHION SHOW. Нам очень нравится этот модный оттенок 🥑🥑🥑🥑🥑 зеленого. Особенно в сочетании с сиреневым.
❤24🔥24👍23🎉20👏15
#модно_тренд_лето2026_chloe_цветы Цветы 🌸🌸🌸🌸 повсюду — вот девиз этого лета. Даже в ушах, как у модели с показа CHLOÉ SPRING SUMMER 2026. Цветочный декор в украшениях по-прежнему в тренде, но выглядит он иначе, чем несколько лет назад. В 2026 году особенно актуальны серьги — розы, пионы, орхидеи, лилии.
👏5👍4❤2🎉2🔥1
#модно_тренд_лето2026_chloe_кружево Кружевная отделка лифа — хит 💃💃💃💃 этого сезона. Любуемся трендом в коллекции CHLOÉ SPRING SUMMER 2026.
👍29👏28🔥28🎉26❤20
#модно_тренд_халтер Халтер по-прежнему 👍👍👍👍 в моде. Что подтверждает образ из коллекции ANDRÉS OTALORA RESORT 2027 LOOKBOOK. Что же такое халтер? Не все знают. Халтер (от англ. halter — «хомут») — это вид верхней части топа, платья или купальника, в котором лямки или бретели завязываются или застегиваются на шее, или же обхватывают шею на манер петли. Чаще всего термин «халтер» употребляется по отношению к купальни…
🔥29🎉28❤24👏23👍20
#модно_тренд_горох_воланы Модный 🔥🔥🔥🔥 вайб лета: горох плюс воланы на блузе. Образ от LILY BROWN HIGH SUMMER 2026 LOOKBOOK.
🔥24👏22❤15🎉12👍12
#модно_тренд_цветочныйпринт_chloe Заряжаемся цветочным 🌸🌸🌸🌸 настроением от сарафана CHLOÉ SPRING SUMMER 2026 FASHION SHOW.
👏16🔥15🎉14👍12❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @modno2025. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Модно” (@modno2025), 2,936 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/modno2025.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.