Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,437–4,487 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 19:37
4,443
-5
13 Sept 2026, 13:41
4,448
-3
9 Sept 2026, 21:37
4,451
-10
4 Sept 2026, 04:59
4,461
-5
31 Aug 2026, 19:55
4,466
-6
29 Aug 2026, 00:32
4,472
-9
26 Aug 2026, 10:05
4,481
+6
23 Aug 2026, 01:48
4,475
-1
19 Aug 2026, 16:52
4,476
+2
16 Aug 2026, 17:06
4,474
-2
13 Aug 2026, 10:07
4,476
-4
10 Aug 2026, 09:21
4,480
+6
7 Aug 2026, 00:03
4,474
-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:03
4,476
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:54
4,476
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 55s
Average length
2m 55s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,224 reactions across 19 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
573
46.8%
❤
330
27.0%
💔
140
11.4%
👏
106
8.66%
😢
20
1.63%
😭
10
0.817%
👎
9
0.735%
🕊
9
0.735%
👌
6
0.49%
😘
4
0.327%
💩
3
0.245%
💯
3
0.245%
🔥
3
0.245%
❤🔥
2
0.163%
🙏
2
0.163%
😁
1
0.082%
😱
1
0.082%
🤔
1
0.082%
🤝
1
0.082%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,224 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ده اصل علیه حماقت
✍ مجتبی نجفی
-هیچ گاه من نماینده ملت نیستم. حرف زدن از طرف مردم، تکنیک تحمیل عقیده به دیگری است.
- هیچ گاه از طرف نسلم یا نسل دیگر حرف نمیزنم. نسل یک واحد یکپارچه نیست، رنگارنگ و تکه تکه است. من نماینده خودم هستم نه یک نسل.
- من همیشه بخشی از مردم ام و متناسب با شرایط میتوانم اقلیت باشم یا اکثریت. اقلیت و اکثریت هم واقعیت های شناورند. نقطه ایستا ندارند. در مواردی میتوانم جز اکثریت باشم در موا…
بخشهایی از مصاحبه مجتبی نجفی با دویچه وله درباره گزارش رویترز در مورد رضا پهلوی، گزارش از "الینا فرهادی":
🔺غرب یک واحد یکدست نیست و برداشتهای موجود در آن نسبت به مساله ایران ناهمگون و متکثر است.
🔺غرب هیچگاه رضا پهلوی و جریان سلطنتطلب را به عنوان "یک گزینه جدی" تلقی نکرده.
🔺هنگامی که در ادبیات سیاسی از گزینه جدی سخن گفته میشود، منظور آلترناتیوی است که توانایی واقعی برای "کسب و مدیریت قدرت" را داشته باشد، "درون خو…
برای " سینا جعفری" فرزند ایران
مجتبی نجفی
" سینا جعفری" کودک دو ساله، تازه ترین قربانی بمبها و موشکهای آمریکایی است. او به همراه پدرو مادرش در قشم کشته شده. دیدم یکی نوشته بود نقطه زنی شده، یکی نوشته بررسی کردیم خانواده از " ارزشی" هاست. حتما میخواهند بگویند خب شادی کنید. یادم آمد وقتی تصویر نوه دو ساله خامنه ای را منتشر کردم و نوشتم من به عنوان قربانی خامنه ای، هنگامی که تصویر نوه اش را دیدم بر خود لرزیدم و ان…
" ملت ما را آزاد بگذارید"
مجتبی نجفی
در این شرایط سهمگین سیاسی اعتراض شهروندانی از اصفهان به اعدام بازداشت شدگان رخداد دی ماه، یک کنش شجاعانه بود. اگر چه برخورد قدرت و آزار معترضان باعث اندوه است اما همین حساسیت مردمی به اعدام، تداوم بارقه امیدی است از زنده بودن وجدان جمعی ایرانیان و روحیه ظلم ستیزی. من اگر جای اصحاب قدرت بودم، اول با چنین مردمی مهربانی میکردم و این روحیه ظلم ستیزی و دیگرخواهی را در خدمت توسعه ملی…
میناب زخم مشاع، زخم ایران
مجتبی نجفی
زبانم بند آمده. مراسم خاکسپاری " علیرضا شهرجو" از کشته شدگان میناب باید تکرار شود. نقطه سر خط. یعنی جسدی که چهار ماه پیش در خاک سپرده شد از آن علیرضا نیست و جسد سوخته او باید دوباره تدفین شود. یکبار دیگر خانواده او باید از نو سوگواری کنند. وداع قبلی منسوخ شده، وداع جدید در راه است. حجم فاجعه آنقدر بزرگ است که کمبود کلمات برای توصیف، بیداد میکند. اصلا توصیف شدنی نیست، درک شدنی ن…
نه کره شمالی نه لیبی، زنده باد ایران
مجتبی نجفی
همدلی ها با مردم جنوب ایران برخی را متعجب کرده چرا زمان فاجعه میناب نبود؟ من از این زاویه نگاه میکنم که گفتمانی پیروز شده که در زمان فاجعه قلم میزد، نگاه نکن قربانی چه گرایش سیاسی دارد، بایست و محکوم کن و بین ملت قربانی خط کشی نکن. این گفتمان، زمان فاجعه میناب مظلوم بود و امروز پیروز شده چون همگانی شده. اینترنت را قطع کرده بودند و شما نبودید که به امثال من که هم با …
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @modjtabanajafifrance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@modjtabanajafifrance edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“mojtaba najafi(مجتبی نجفی)” (@modjtabanajafifrance), 4,443 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/modjtabanajafifrance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.