#优惠 #英国 #eSIM ✅Ctexcel uk 5折优惠码又能用了 😬点我开卡 😬优惠码:DEAL50OFF 😬大陆要 wifi calling 激活 😬5折只能用于新用户
❤3🎉1👍1

Channel
@modesim
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,807subscribers
+115 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003765610977 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @modesim |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/modesim |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:40 | 1,807 | +73 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:50 | 1,734 | +42 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 1,692 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 1,692 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (26 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 30,410 |
| Reactions total | 122 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
122 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 37 | 30.3% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 25.4% | |
| 🎉 | 22 | 18.0% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 8.20% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 7.38% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 4.10% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 4.10% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 2.46% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @modesim. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#优惠 #英国 #eSIM ✅Ctexcel uk 5折优惠码又能用了 😬点我开卡 😬优惠码:DEAL50OFF 😬大陆要 wifi calling 激活 😬5折只能用于新用户
❤3🎉1👍1
✅补充: 注册TG可以用TG X 客户端, 群友实测可以免费注册, 记得IP要干净点! 😬保号: https://activate.tigo.com.sv/activations/sim 进不去换美IP -可以免费用6个月 这个网站充值,后面每180天发1条短信余额有变动保号! -不知道能活多久,所以说到手就注册 现在依旧可以薅! 反正不要钱,注册几个TG玩玩! 😬开不了了,关门了
👍12❤5🔥2🎉1
可以多试几下!
🔥3❤1🎉1👏1
#羊毛 #萨尔瓦多 #eSIM 免费领取 +503 eSIM 号码8位数 @tigomodesim_bot 😬教程: 先扫描下载eSIM,不要启用,获取iccid,发送给机器人,获得号码过后再启用! 发的有点晚,已经被别人快薅完了,现在放号特别慢,基本上会失败,得多试几次! ✅注意: 有信号了记得先注册,接个TG,+503号码8位数,挺好看!免费薅的,估计过不了多久就封了! 😬已关门
🔥3❤1🎉1👍1👏1
#羊毛 #eSIM #免费 😬免费领3天无限量 eSIM: 😬前往:https://maya.net -选择3天的套餐, -然后使用优惠码即可! 3DAYSFREE 🛫优惠码 ✅用不了的,换个IP就行了! 😬每天5G高速-用完限速10Mbps 😬IP是新加坡的 😬已关门 by:@modesim
👍5🤩2❤1🎉1
#eSIM #Ctexcel #英国 ✅Ctexcel uk 1GBP领卡: 😬点我前往领卡 ✅又可以1GBP领实体卡了!
❤3🎉1👍1👏1
#eSIM #越南 #灵车 一一一一一一一一一 越南🇻🇳Vnsky已KYC eSIM 一一一一一一一一一 😢前言: -需要2G3G网络激活 -没有的直接跳过 -充话费选MobiFone ✅开卡: -点我前往开卡 -选择日期就是激活的日期 ✅激活: 到达激活的日期过后,手动选择2G或者3G的信号,连上过后拨打[ *0# ] 就会显示号码,建议截屏保存,然后去话费充值平台充值5000~10000VND话费,充值好发短信[ DK CVQT ALL ]到→9199,建议多发几条,等几分钟过后就会提示漫游已经激活,这时候开关一下飞行模式就有稳定4G信号了! ✅保号: -激活好自带60天 -等快到期的时候再保号 -每30天发条短信 -每30天充值一次 -两个办法都可以 -发短信1年保号≈10CNY ✅总结: 支持联网删除转移号码5次! 越南号码基本都要视频认证! 这个不用实名已经很不错了! 可以找有2G3G信号帮忙激活! by:@…
🎉3💯3👍1🔥1
#eSIM #格鲁吉亚 #羊毛 一一一一一一一一一 格鲁吉亚🇬🇪 cellfie eSIM 免费开 一一一一一一一一一 ✅开卡: -点我前往开卡 ✅激活: -按步骤0元开通eSIM -需要KYC扫护照 -eSIM会发送到邮箱 -需要充值才会来信号 ✅保号: -每120天余额有变动保号 -保号365天大概5CNY -登入app左上角Keep Your Number 每30天0.1gel,自动扣 一年1.2gel,大概3块钱 -两个保号方法都能用 ✅总结: 之前需要付费开卡, 现在可以免费开了, 可以选靓号, 保号也非常便宜! 扫护照需要多扫几次才能过! by:@modesim @yuegui
❤7🎉2👍1🔥1🤩1
😬之前卡BUG付的, 😬开始陆续收到退款了! ✅老杜还给我留了几个礼物!
🎉3👍2🤩1
#英国 #eSIM #羊毛 ✅Ctexcel UK申请链接: 😬点我前往开卡 ✅5折优惠码: 😬 DEAL50OFF -点一下复制 仅需18GBP就可以开通 365天50G中国漫游套餐! 这个优惠码,其他套餐也能用!
🎉3👍3👏1🤩1
giffgaff开杀,转到哪里好?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👏3🎉2💯2
#giffgaff #英国 #eSIM giffgaff 卡彻底关门,目前正在分批向用户发送邮件,断开长期在英国境外的用户服务。 😬还没封的尽快转走
❤5🤝2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @modesim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
giffgaff开杀,转到哪里好?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 90,916 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mod eSIM” (@modesim), 1,807 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/modesim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.