Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ананасы в шампанском 🍍🥂

@modern_ruins

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,358subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001677659593
TypeChannel
Username@modern_ruins
Created11 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/modern_ruins

Growth

1,3581,3611,359.56 August 2026 — 1,361 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,361 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,359 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,358 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,358–1,361 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 17:551,358-1
10 Aug 2026, 19:171,359-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:491,361no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:461,361first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.4%
avg views ÷ 1,358 subscribers
Avg views / post
385
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (30 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total3,080
Reactions total223
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

499 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22244.5%
🤣8917.8%
🔥6913.8%
👍5711.4%
💯408.02%
custom 5276385254624472360224.41%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 499reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @modern_ruins. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC197 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Второй сезон «Люди Икс 97» продолжают держать марку. Не уверен, что это также воздействует на тех, кто в детстве не смотрел оригинальный сериал, но для моего поколения тут огонь из всех ностальгических орудий.

🔥9💯63

3 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC354 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну уже возможно сказать, что позитивный эффект от кино есть.

19🤣10

2 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC304 views29 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я тут для себя открыл британский «Карточный домик», который потом пересняли американцы с Кевином Спейси в роли Фрэнка Андервуда, и… это восхитительно. Иан Ричардсон с его аристократическими чертами лица просто великолепно играет интригана Фрэнсиса Уркхарта, свергающего премьер-министра. Что бросается в глаза: в отличие от своего американского аналога, британский герой намного меньше говорит. Там, где Фрэнк Андервуд

14👍10🔥5

26 Jul 2026, 18:51 UTC458 views64 reactions6 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я когда-то видел рилс, где мать ходила с ребенком на руках в самолете, а пассажиры якобы думали: «Чего ей дома не сидится? Мешает только всем». Потом то же самое происходит с отцом, и все такие: «Боже, он просто герой. Ты посмотри на него! Настоящий мужчина!». Подтверждаю. Все так и есть. Когда гуляю один с Платоном, то стоит только зайти в кафе, и хостес сразу с большой охотой помогают, с широкой улыбкой. Одна даж

53👍8🔥3

26 Jul 2026, 15:35 UTC411 views26 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Поскольку на момент покупки первого тома все собрание стоило тысяч 20, то я решил собирать их по одной книге. Получилось ли сэкономить? Немного. К моменту покупки 4-го тома появились в продаже все четыре книги за 10 тысяч. У меня вышло немного дешевле. Большую часть цены составил 4-й том. Я не знаю почему, но он не продавался отдельно. Мы уже начали шутить, что это как Книга смыслов в «Библиотекаре» Елизарова. В

custom 527638525462447236015🔥74

24 Jul 2026, 18:24 UTC409 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Слушаю и читаю сейчас «Когнату» Алексея Сальникова про непростые взаимоотношения людей и драконов. Ну как драконов… В мире автора это не ящеры, а существа, выглядящие почти как люди, но при этом обладающие нечеловеческой силой и скоростью, а также умеющие летать, дышать огнем. Отношения у людей и драконов сложные. С одной стороны, часть драконов регулярно пытается подчинить себе людей, исповедуя теорию расового пр

🔥113👍3

19 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC444 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Подкаст «Записки на досуге» Сериал «Сёгун». Что в нем осталось от истории? - разбираемся, насколько верно создатели изобразили исторические реалии Сэнгоку Дзидай и что в новой экранизации лучше-хуже чем в старой. Слушать могут все, вне зависимости от того смотрели вы сериал или нет. К слову, он получил 18 наград «Эмми»! Женщины из самурайских родов. Амбиции, интриги, верность - здесь мы решили поговорить о роли же

👍93🔥2

16 Jul 2026, 19:27 UTC503 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Тут в начале июля Верховный Суд опубликовал тематический обзор по делам, связанным с оспариванием сделок, повлекших переход права собственности на жилые помещения. Под этим сложным названием кроется обзор дел, в которых, чаще всего, продавец был обманут мошенниками либо не понимал, в силу психического состояния, значения своих действий. Верховный Суд раскрывает различные нюансы таких дел. Вот как определить, что по

26

14 Jul 2026, 21:21 UTC566 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ну вы уже поняли почему на этом канале нет анализа футбольных матчей. Подвела кухонная аналитика.

🤣34💯4

14 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC538 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я не смотрю футбол, но каждый день на работе слушаю глубокую (без шуток) аналитику каждой прошедшей игры. Из нее я могу заключить, что финал - 🇫🇷 и 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Победит - 🇫🇷

🤣26

13 Jul 2026, 16:14 UTC589 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Друзья, есть вы изучаете славянское язычество, то можете посоветовать актуальную научную (научно-популярную) работу по этой теме? Важно. Интересует наука, а не фолк-хистори. Интересуют работы, написанные людьми из научного мира. Буду очень признателен.

5🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 06:05 UTC558 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

За последнее время видел несколько выступлений публичных спикеров, призывающих людей бросить душные города, уезжать в деревни и создать там свое хозяйство. Кто-то даже призывал к этому студентов. Мол, купите себе дом, а не ютитесь в городских квартирах, и нарожайте кучу детей. Позиционируется это все как более доступная альтернатива, но правда в том, что таковой она не является. Покупка дома в деревне, внезапно, с

💯286👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @modern_ruins. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 465,471 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ананасы в шампанском 🍍🥂” (@modern_ruins), 1,358 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/modern_ruins.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.