Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 19 days, net -191. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,616–3,865 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 00:18
3,645
-23
11 Sept 2026, 07:22
3,668
-32
6 Sept 2026, 10:40
3,700
-84
2 Sept 2026, 12:16
3,784
-20
30 Aug 2026, 08:33
3,804
-29
27 Aug 2026, 08:32
3,833
-3
26 Aug 2026, 14:00
3,836
no change
26 Aug 2026, 13:45
3,836
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 15 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 48s
Average length
1m 36s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,017 reactions across 15 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
173
17.0%
👍
173
17.0%
🤣
171
16.8%
😢
152
14.9%
💔
97
9.54%
👎
68
6.69%
🤬
43
4.23%
🎉
42
4.13%
👏
42
4.13%
👌
13
1.28%
😭
12
1.18%
🔥
8
0.787%
😁
7
0.688%
😐
3
0.295%
🤪
3
0.295%
😡
2
0.197%
🤝
2
0.197%
🤯
2
0.197%
🍾
1
0.098%
🕊
1
0.098%
2 further kinds
2
0.197%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,017 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2026 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
تصویرِ بالا، کاسهی گدایی مسئولین قضایی شهرمون جلوی مردمه، اما باجستان محلات پارو فراتر گذاشته و از خانوادهی این بچهها ۴۰ میلیارد پول درخواست کرده تا از طرف باجستانی محلات رضایت بده!!!
*آقای باجستان، اگر مشکلتون پوله اعلام کنید تا مردم با کمک همدیگه جورش کنن، اما عمرا بتونی تصور کنی با اعدامِ فقط یکی از این بچهها، چه بلاها و اتفاقاتی تو شهرمون در انتظارتونه..
#جمهوری_حرامزادگان_اسلامی
حكم محاربه و اعدامِ ۵ نفر از بازداشت
شدگان دى ماه در شهرستان محلات توسط
بيدادگاه جمهورى اعدامى صادر شده.
#قاسم_اصلانی : کارگر و نگهبان گلخانه
#علیاکبر_محلوجی : راننده اتوبوس، صاحب دو فرزند، بچه هیئتی که ۲۰ سال سابقهی خدمت در راهیان نور و تورهای کربلا و مشهد داره !!
#حسین_شکوهی : شاغل در معدن و سنگبری
#حسام_عیسایی : موبایل فروش
#عرفان_خلیلی : کارگر سوپرمارکت
به قولِ نوید افکاری جمهوری اسلامی به دنبال "گردن" بر…
ملیحه عطاالهی همسر جعفری از فرماندهان هوا و فضای خمین
در اسفند ماه آپارتمانش در خیابان جمهوری ، لابنده توسط پهپادهای اسرائیل بمباران شد و شوهرش (جعفری) فقط پایش شکست و جان سالم به در برد و توسط اطلاعات سپاه محلات فراری داده شد.
ارتش اسرائیل رئیس شاخه مهندسی سپاه لبنان وابسته به نیروی قدس را در منطقه محلات ایران به هلاکت رساند
نیروی هوایی دیروز (سهشنبه) با هدایت اطلاعاتی معاونت اطلاعات و در عملیاتی، مهندس مهدی وفایی، رئیس شاخه مهندسی سپاه لبنانِ وابسته به نیروی قدس را در منطقه محلات در ایران از پا درآورد.
وفایی طی ۲۰ سال فعالیت خود بهعنوان رئیس شاخه مهندسی، پروژههای گسترده زیرزمینی را در لبنان و سوریه پیش برد. او در چارچوب مسئولیتهایش،…
دوتا نکتهی مهم:
عکسی که در پست قبل از حمله به محلات گذاشتم از خبرگزاری های داخلی بود و الان متوجه شدم عکس تزئینی هست! (چند خبرگزاری داخلی رو چک کردم، هیچکدوم از عکس ها شبیه هم نیست)!!
نکته دوم اینکه دیشب در اولین خبرهای داخلی اعلام شد یک واحد مسکونی در محلات مورد اصابت قرار گرفته (منبع).
اما در ادامه هر خبرگزاری تعداد خانه های مورد هدف قرارگرفته و تخریب شده رو دلبخواه اعلام کردن!!
یکی زده دو واحد مسکونی، یکی زده …
ترور هدفمند ارتش اسرائیل در محلات!
حوالی ساعت ۱۱ شب دوشنبه ۱۰ فروردین، یک منزل مسکونی واقع در شهرک امام (لع)، پایینتر از میدان پرستار (حوالی کوچه شاهرخی) مورد حمله ارتش اسرائیلی قرار گرفت..
در پی این حمله چند واحد مسکونی اطراف نیز خسارت دیدند.
هدف این ترور یک فرمانده ارشد سپاه بوده
به گزراش رسانهی داخلی این حمله تا کنون ۳ کشته و ۷ زخمی داشته
هممیهنانم،
امروز، سال خود را در میانهی نبردی میهنی با جمهوری اسلامی انیرانی، و با یاد همه فرزندان دلاور و جاویدنام ایران، نو میکنیم.
سالی که گذشت، سال سازماندهی برای اقدام نهایی بود؛
سال شکوه همبستگی ملی، شجاعتهای کمنظیر، و فداکاریهای بزرگ؛
سالی که ما را یک گام بلند به پیروزی نهایی نزدیکتر کرد؛
سالی که نشان داد عزم ملت ایران برای ساختن آیندهای آزاد و آباد، استوارتر از همیشه است.
در سالی که گذشت، ضحاک زمانه…
نوروز امسال خیلی متفاوته..
یکیش اینکه، دیگه این👆غیرِ ایرانی نیست تا بدون هیچ نشانهای از نوروز، سال نو رو تبریک نگه!!
پیشاپیش جشن باستانی نوروز رو شادباش میگم و امید دارم سال نو، سالِ تغییرات بزرگ برای همه ایرانیان خواهد بود..
پاینده ایران 💚🤍❤️
❤24👍9👎8👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @mobarezane_mahallat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🎻🎧❤️ آهنگ مازرونی ❤️🎧🎻 @AHANGMAZERONI · 47,213 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مبارزان محلات” (@mobarezane_mahallat), 3,645 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mobarezane_mahallat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.