Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 66 days, net +29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 164–201 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Oct 2026, 14:49
197
+6
1 Oct 2026, 04:20
191
+17
13 Sept 2026, 05:02
174
+1
28 Aug 2026, 23:47
173
+3
22 Aug 2026, 16:35
170
+2
8 Aug 2026, 15:32
168
no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:11
168
first reading
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 24s
Average length
1m 24s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
104 reactions across 4 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
39
37.5%
❤
27
26.0%
custom 5393262138066242446
18
17.3%
🎉
9
8.65%
👍
6
5.77%
💯
3
2.88%
👏
1
0.962%
🤣
1
0.962%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Не все в МОА — архитекторы. И это, наверное, одно из главных преимуществ компании полного цикла.
Часть консорциума — «ТЕКОМ» — занимается инженерными системами. А главный инженер Денис Семкичев уже почти 25 лет проектирует и эксплуатирует сложные объекты — от гостиниц до крупных коммерческих проектов. И ведёт свою колонку об этом.
Недавно Денис съездил в турецкий город Сакарья, где находится один из заводов Daikin,…
Гостиница у Мзымты.
Один из наших проектов для Красной Поляны.
Участок расположен прямо у берега Мзымты, поэтому почти вся логика комплекса строится вокруг реки. Корпуса вытянуты вдоль русла и раскрываются к нему террасами, а сами номера ориентированы на лес и горные склоны.
Архитектурный образ складывается из нескольких источников. Здесь есть отсылки к традиционной архитектуре Кавказа, мотивы европейских шале и со…
Есть ощущение, что слово «брендинг» вообще немного испортили.
Чаще всего под ним представляют логотип, шрифт и фирменные цвета. Нам же всегда было интереснее (и важнее!) другое — попробовать сформулировать, в чём вообще ценность будущего проекта и как её сможет почувствовать человек.
Ну, потому что итоговый потребитель — он не думает о бетонных перекрытиях. А представляет совсем другое: как будет жить в этом месте …
МОА — 7 лет
А семь лет — это уже возраст
Возраст больших проектов, архитектурных экспедиций, бессонных дедлайнов, конкурсов, побед и команды, без которой ничего этого не было бы.
Поэтому сегодня слово как раз нашей команде, которая проживает каждый момент МОА. Семь воспоминаний, семь небольших историй про то, как росла Мастерская.
Ну, а отмечать будем весь июль. Во-первых, можем себе позволить. Во-вторых, 6 июля, …
🔥16🎉9custom 53932621380662424469❤5👏1🤣1
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @moateams. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MOA” (@moateams), 197 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moateams.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
