Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Lurk Moar

@moarlurk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

38,312subscribers

-35 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001077067818
TypeChannel
Username@moarlurk
DescriptionТолько по вопросам сотрудничества/рекламы: @fivesdays Разбан/предложка @gooddaytodia Донат https://dalink.to/fivesdays Реклама через биржу https://telega.in/c/moarlurk № 4942307045 Резерв https://t.me/+Rkgdz0DiB5thZTAy Уютный киноканал @lm_cinema
Created28 December 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/moarlurk

Growth

38,31238,34738,329.56 August 2026 — 38,347 subscribers6 August 2026 — 38,347 subscribers7 August 2026 — 38,340 subscribers8 August 2026 — 38,338 subscribers9 August 2026 — 38,333 subscribers10 August 2026 — 38,326 subscribers11 August 2026 — 38,319 subscribers12 August 2026 — 38,317 subscribers14 August 2026 — 38,312 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,307–38,352 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 00:5738,312-5
12 Aug 2026, 16:3438,317-2
11 Aug 2026, 15:2738,319-7
10 Aug 2026, 17:4938,326-7
9 Aug 2026, 20:1138,333-5
8 Aug 2026, 17:3838,338-2
7 Aug 2026, 17:1538,340-7
6 Aug 2026, 20:1038,347no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:4838,347first reading

Engagement

148 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 38,312 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,140
148 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
148
of 148 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held148 (5 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total613,060
Reactions total15,117
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
47,900
Videos
7,020
Links
4,640

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
12m 11s
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

15,117 reactions across 148 posts, in 60 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51929966263266251202,54616.8%
🤣1,54910.2%
custom 52562456375774771201,3819.14%
😁1,3368.84%
custom 53370114367218391221,1697.73%
custom 53911134733022363381,0506.95%
9386.20%
😭6894.56%
custom 53887041212032361354833.20%
💯4402.91%
🤡4202.78%
😢4122.73%
custom 53890594223727990044062.69%
🥰3782.50%
🤪1851.22%
😎1781.18%
👍1651.09%
💅1360.9%
❤‍🔥1300.86%
👻1230.814%
40 further kinds1,0036.63%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 148 of the 148 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 148 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,310 views38 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭253🐳3custom 53370114367218391223custom 53911134733022363383💯1

14 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC≈2,270 views63 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

37custom 539111347330223633812💯7🐳3😎2custom 53370114367218391221custom 53890594223727990041

14 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC≈2,850 views87 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣57custom 539111347330223633814custom 53370114367218391224😢3custom 51929966263266251202custom 538905942237279900421🌭1

14 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC≈3,010 views78 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @obmaazPhoto

#обмазчане_пишут

custom 519299662632662512059😁9🌚5custom 53370114367218391222🗿1custom 53887041212032361351custom 53890594223727990041

14 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC≈3,520 views128 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 533701143672183912277custom 5192996626326625120239🍌5😁5🥰3🌭2💯2

14 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC≈3,360 views77 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53370114367218391226010😁4🤪1🥰1custom 53911134733022363381

14 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC≈3,260 views10 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 51929966263266251203custom 53370114367218391222🌭1🥴1😭1custom 53890594223727990041custom 53911134733022363381

14 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC≈3,660 views135 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣85😭24custom 519299662632662512011custom 53911134733022363385custom 538870412120323613543custom 53370114367218391223

14 Aug 2026, 02:05 UTC≈3,760 views156 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 539111347330223633885😭42custom 51929966263266251209custom 53887041212032361357😱43👻2custom 53370114367218391222

14 Aug 2026, 01:47 UTC≈3,620 views10 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🌭3🐳2custom 53370114367218391222custom 538905942237279900421

13 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC≈4,170 views124 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 538905942237279900472😁19👍12💯54custom 51929966263266251204custom 53911134733022363384😎2

13 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC≈4,280 views172 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥96🥰33custom 5192996626326625120147🤗6😭5custom 53370114367218391224custom 53887041212032361354

Showing the 12 most recent of 148 posts we hold for @moarlurk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 261,594 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lurk Moar” (@moarlurk), 38,312 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moarlurk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.