約完一個再來一個~ 第一個是氣質熟女姊姊 第二個是年輕試車學生妹~
❤1🔥1🖕1

Channel
@mmy7878
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,549subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002226552269 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mmy7878 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mmy7878 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 2,549 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 2,555 | -6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 2,561 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 2,565 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 2,562 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 2,559 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 2,556 | +18 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 2,538 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 2,534 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (6 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 585 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
22 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 36.4% | |
| 🖕 | 5 | 22.7% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 18.2% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 9.09% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
約完一個再來一個~ 第一個是氣質熟女姊姊 第二個是年輕試車學生妹~
❤1🔥1🖕1
長的像明星的妹妹~ (神秘嘉賓)#雙北 藝名:XX 164cm D奶 23-24歲 46kg #顏值最佳選擇 真的很捧小六的場 #謝謝你 原本今天沒有想要約的 但是聽小六說有不錯的。 專門停留下來的 看看小六說的妹妹! 最後不負他的期待 #見到妹妹之後~ 這個可以 錢給她了 #結束之後 剛結束 準備沖 這個👍讚 顏值 身材 皮膚 都很讚 胸部也是真的 數一數二的讚讚妹 👧那你看她像那個明星嗎? 👱平常看沒有 某一些角度確實有 #結果後面小六才知道 他說的角度既然是在床上的角度😂
❤1🔥1🖕1
神秘嘉賓@@@(之前上岸的紅牌再次回歸) #高雄 158cm 大C奶 25歲-26歲 47kg 小隻馬大奶的女生 #約會結束對話: 結束了 人漂亮身材很好 很有女友感 玩累了就抱著聊天 妹妹很貼心 看我一直流汗 又幫我沖一次澡 然後我就幫她舔到高潮 她說換她玩 然後 她累了~ 她說她喜歡我這樣 挑逗她 妹妹哪裡的觸感我也很喜歡 之前跟你說過 我喜歡服務妹妹 看妹妹舒服 會有成就感~ 剛好這個妹妹反應就是我喜歡的。
❤1🔥1🖕1
他說:小六真好
❤1🔥1🖕1
今天台北来了好多高级妹~(百分百正)
❤1👍1🖕1
懂得都懂意思是什麼意思?
❤2🥰1😍1
三節的約會 #高雄私藏妹 (高挑大奶的技術妹)配合度百分百 分數直接狂飆105分 🍑🍑隱藏 166cm D奶 體重秘密 25歲 約會心得: 身高166 罩杯D 體重妹子說秘密 妹妹一進門就笑臉迎人。非常討喜的妹子。一開始先互相幫忙脫衣服去泡澡。脫衣服的時候就差點被妹妹吃掉(開始對我上下其手)這個妹子皮膚白皙,算有點高挑型。毛刮的很乾淨。小豆豆也很敏感。摸沒幾下就充血變大豆豆了。服務過程中會吐舌頭翻白眼的看著你。超級誘惑人的眼神。妹妹聲音很嬌很好聽。LG69吹簫舔蛋服務樣樣來,時候還幫你X槍。那個眼神真的超級誘惑人的。
❤1👍1😁1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @mmy7878. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 100,400 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小六六雜事【客評分享】加入Gleezy:mmy7888” (@mmy7878), 2,549 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mmy7878.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.