@DoomDotOrg Lol August 8, 2026 at 12:20AM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085868738994229687

Channel
Mark Minervini Tweets
@mmtweets
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
265subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001905754524 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mmtweets |
| Description | https://x.com/markminervini |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mmtweets |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 265 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:41 | 265 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.1%
- avg views ÷ 265 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 26.8
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 536 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Links
- ≈4,940
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Some investors took comfort in the fact that Cathie Wood was buying Skillz and continued adding to her position as it fell. Throughout 2021, her ETFs aggressively accumulated millions of shares during the decline, convinced they were buying a disruptive growth company at bargain https://t.co/5UkmfaWHwh August 7, 2026 at 03:42PM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085738254725173469
@hauntingangel13 @Mattaverse21 Lol! And I could tell you the winning lottery number in hindsight. August 7, 2026 at 02:30PM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085720310188306503
You only here this nonsense in roaring bull markets. August 7, 2026 at 01:59PM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085712433071423727
@kiki_toolazy For those who don't know, fpr years in the 90s, Soros Management was my consulting client. There's those of us who talk from experience. And then there's those who talk out of their ass. August 7, 2026 at 01:58PM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085712070654267501
@dynamictrader2 @StonkCrab No, it's like two cars arguing... one has brakes, the other one doesn't, and the one without brakes says he's never gonna crash. August 7, 2026 at 01:55PM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085711422638432525
No, it's not!I can't believe how many people still think changing the label somehow changes the math. Calling it an "investment" instead of a "trade" doesn't make a loss any smaller or improve the odds of recovery. A 50% loss is still a 50% loss.Just because you intend to https://t.co/XM0c2LRM3z August 7, 2026 at 11:12AM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085670357780873251
@TrendTraderrr @robertlu94134 True... for most. We do hope you become a member, but there will be hours of learning. August 7, 2026 at 08:29AM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085629328759370083
@JTrade_11 Just a sales pitch? No. Are we selling my platform? Yes. But you will learn. August 7, 2026 at 08:23AM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085627893015540119
@__Wait_for_it_ @Kente_Clarke 👍 August 7, 2026 at 05:06AM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085578346981695686
@__Wait_for_it_ @Kente_Clarke I'm not saying I never use chatgpt. But when I do, I tell it specifically to keep my writing as is and not to change it, but to only suggest major grammatical error changes. And even then, I rewrite it myself again. I wrote three books before chatgpt was available. I think August 7, 2026 at 02:56AM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085545629388873954
@oneluv4329 @Kente_Clarke Pre chatGpt 😇🙏 August 7, 2026 at 02:51AM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085544346602950930
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mmtweets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,274,451 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mark Minervini Tweets” (@mmtweets), 265 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mmtweets.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.