10 measurements spanning 23 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,686–2,699 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Aug 2026, 08:23
2,691
-2
28 Aug 2026, 06:22
2,693
+1
25 Aug 2026, 00:07
2,692
-5
21 Aug 2026, 21:19
2,697
+1
18 Aug 2026, 23:08
2,696
+3
15 Aug 2026, 19:36
2,693
+1
12 Aug 2026, 09:46
2,692
+5
9 Aug 2026, 02:21
2,687
-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:30
2,688
no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:21
2,688
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 16 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.6%
avg views ÷ 2,691 subscribers
Avg views / post
474
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
15 (16 April 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
947
Reactions total
74
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
872 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
✍
234
26.8%
custom 5447567734621627078
223
25.6%
🍓
109
12.5%
💅
87
9.98%
🤯
83
9.52%
👌
73
8.37%
🍾
46
5.28%
⚡
8
0.917%
🌚
4
0.459%
🫡
3
0.344%
😍
2
0.229%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 872reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mmm_targetolog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 April 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
каждые три месяца в инсте появляется новая народная примета. сейчас все просят скопировать ссылку на рилс, потому что это / типа / помогает ролику залететь
штож...........
инст действительно учитывает шеры как сильный сигнал для алгоритмов. если человек отправил видик другому пользователю, добавил его в сторис или поделился другим способом — инст понимает, что контент вызвал реакцию
из этого сделали вывод, что 20 …
помимо инструкции по utm и яндекс метрике, которая вышла в субботу, у меня есть документ по повышению индексации имени артиста в гугл и яндексе / рекорд пр пересылам за 2025й год /
сохраняйте, чтобы не потерять
с понедельником!
только ленивый не написал про ии в музыке за последние пол года, а мне вот интересна тема денег. в этой заметке — как принимать решения о бюджете на продвижение, когда нет гарантий
давно нет понятия правильных или нужных бюджетов, если речь идет не про чартовые релизы артистов А+. вместо этого нужно работать с рамкой
смотрим не на то, сколько можно потратить, а на то, что мы контролируем и на что влияем. есть ли у …
работаю над звуком нового трека Арсена Lizer совместно с его командой. трек выйдет этой ночью
посмотрим, как плотная длительная работа скажется на стримах и онлайне. получили 640к взаимодействий с посевными видиками и более 7к пересъемов
кстати, в августе прошлого года писала материал на тему того, как начать снимать контент в соцсетях — очень полезный и виральный, как показывает количество пересылов
если у вас ес…
импульс пару дней криво показывает статистику — я уже хотела ругаться / как обычно /, но заметила кое-что прикольное. они вносят новые метрики по кампаниям, которые скорее всего скоро начнут работать / мб все уже об этом знают, я хз /
: GMV донатов — общий объём денег, который артист заработал через донаты от слушателей благодаря этой кампании
: GMV концертов — выручка от продажи билетов на концерты, если пользоват…
отвечаю на 4 вопроса артистов из моего ЛС + на консультациях. последняя такая заметка была в апреле 2025го / да что вы знаете о стабильности?? /
за это время успел сломаться старый кабинет вк, появиться новый кабинет вк, умереть и возродиться импульс, а я сменила работу и накопила ещё пачку вопросов, которые регулярно прилетают в личку
1 - как часто сейчас нужно выпускать музыку?
за последние несколько лет индустри…
сначала увидела это видео в рилс с охватом в пол миллиона, а спустя несколько месяцев — сообщение в лс:
Здравствуйте, меня зовут Лиза, просто хотела сказать вам спасибо за ваш канал (по моему мнению, это лучший канал на тему муз маркетинга) и особенно посты про пробные рилсы. У моей группы Конус Маха сто лет ничего не получалось в инстаграме, но с двух пробных рилсов подписалось уже больше 2000 человек, о чудо). При…
как вы поняли по фигне я тут не пишу. чаще всего реально классные заметки рождаются, когда есть насущная тема или тема, над которой я очень давно размышляю. сейчас именно такой момент
я часто здесь затрагиваю тему развития экономики внимания. поговорим об этом со стороны платного маркетинга
заметила
: если раньше стандартные 30-50К на релиз что-то решали, то сейчас — они растворяются в источниках прослушивания. ни …
«продавать маркетинг в музыке? ну нет. лучше в Черный Дельфин [пойти работать]» — однажды сказал мой коллега
основной вывод последнего года работы в муз маркетинге: все маркетологи делают одно и тоже, но с разной степенью вовлечения
если вам кажется, что какой-то хайп маркетолог из рилсов / или тг-канала / сможет сотворить какое-то чудо с вашей муз карьерой, то переставайте верить в сказки — мы тут уже давно живем …
подборка самых популярных +самых классных постов в моём канале за последнее время / спонсор этого поста — папка от ИМИ с 12 индустрийными каналами. подписываемся /
1 - какие инструменты для продвижения музыки я использую сейчас чаще всего. тут
2 - автор одного хита или как соцсети формируют узкий сценарий потребления музыки. тут
3 - как сделать так, чтобы ВК Клипы приносили целевую активность и подписчиков. тут
…
🍓20✍19custom 544756773462162707818💅5🤯4🍾2👌2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @mmm_targetolog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 868,662 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Declared links
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“музыкальный таргетолог / Дарина” (@mmm_targetolog), 2,691 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mmm_targetolog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
