8 measurements spanning 5 days, net -51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,958–21,025 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 20:31
20,966
-16
10 Aug 2026, 17:27
20,982
-12
9 Aug 2026, 15:22
20,994
-9
8 Aug 2026, 11:56
21,003
-12
7 Aug 2026, 14:40
21,015
-1
6 Aug 2026, 16:40
21,016
-1
6 Aug 2026, 15:30
21,017
no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:20
21,017
first reading
Engagement
55 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.72%
avg views ÷ 20,966 subscribers
Avg views / post
571
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 55 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 53 of 55 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
55 (4 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
31,410
Reactions total
668
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,180
Videos
≈3,700
Links
≈339
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 08s
Average length
3m 08s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
668 reactions across 53 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
351
52.5%
❤
239
35.8%
👍
32
4.79%
👏
32
4.79%
🥰
14
2.10%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 668reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#Islamic_Republic
Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Esmail Baghaei:
– We strongly condemn the brutal attacks carried out by "Israel" in recent days against southern Lebanon.
– The silence of international institutions, particularly the United Nations Security Council, and its disregard are the reasons behind "Israel's" growing arrogance and continued aggression.
– Washington, through its comprehensive support for "Te…
#Enemy_Media
Yedioth Ahronoth Hebrew Newspaper – Ben-Dror Yemini: The joint agreement between Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan represents a major loss for "Israel" and the United States. It demonstrates the Gulf states' disappointment with the United States, which failed to confront Iran, and clearly highlights the price of "Israel's" refusal to normalize relations with Riyadh.
#Military_Media
#Enemy_Media
Hebrew Channel 15: Every night, Iranian attacks are carried out against U.S. forces in the area of the Strait of Hormuz, while Washington chooses media silence and maintains ambiguity.
Every night, the Iranians launch between two and five drones at vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz. The U.S. administration completely concealed last week's drone attack on the U.S. base in Kuwait. This indicates a …
#Enemy_Media
Kan Hebrew Channel: One year and eight months after the "Israeli" army announced the destruction of the Syrian Air Force following the fall of the Assad regime, the "Israeli" security establishment has recently observed that the Syrians have significantly accelerated the rebuilding of their air force, from recruiting new pilots and training with trainer aircraft and helicopters to conducting their first…
#Enemy_Media
Hebrew Channel 12: The Americans continue to reduce the number of aerial refueling aircraft at Ben Gurion Airport. The number of refueling aircraft is now already close to the level seen during the ceasefire, when there were only about 20 refueling aircraft at the airport.
#Military_Media
#Enemy_Media
Hebrew Channel 12: An operational forum chaired by the Chief of Staff is being held today, with the participation of the senior command staff and operational commanders in the "Israeli" army holding the rank of lieutenant colonel and above.
The forum is being held to conduct a multi-front operational and intelligence update, reinforce routine procedures and fundamentals within the "Israeli" army, and u…
#Enemy_Media
"Israel Hayom" Hebrew Newspaper: Political sources have acknowledged for the first time that there is a dispute between "Israel" and the United States over the 15-point document concerning withdrawal from Gaza, saying: "If there is no other option, we will reach a confrontation with the Trump administration over the Gaza issue."
#Military_Media
#Enemy_Media
Hebrew Channel 13: The United States wants "Israel" to end the fighting on the three active fronts. This was the message conveyed by U.S. Central Command Commander Brad Cooper, who visited "Israel" over the weekend.
Regarding Iran, the "Israeli" army is informing the Americans that "Israel" retains the option of intervening in Iran if intelligence reveals that the Islamic Republic is continuing its det…
#Enemy_Media
Channel 15 Hebrew military analyst: The War Minister and the "Israeli" army cannot disclose what ammunition is lacking or how much is lacking, for obvious reasons related to information security and war preparedness. Netanyahu knows, and of course the Finance Ministry knows as well. However, the funds needed to strengthen capabilities have still not arrived in the required amount.
The one billion sheke…
Statement issued by Hezbollah regarding the map published by the "Israeli" enemy's Foreign Ministry:
The "Israeli" enemy's Foreign Ministry today published a map incorporating occupied southern Lebanon into its entity, providing unequivocal confirmation of the "Israeli" enemy's ambitions regarding Lebanon, its land, resources, and capabilities—ambitions it has not and will not relinquish.
Its entry into direct nego…
#Lebanon
Statement issued by Hezbollah's Media Relations:
The "Israeli" enemy's deliberate setting of fire to forested areas in southern Lebanon and turning them into completely burned and uninhabitable areas constitutes a continuation of the destruction of the built environment, the bulldozing of infrastructure, and the theft of ancient olive trees.
This ongoing environmental devastation is taking place amid the …
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @mmirlb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 32,287 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Military Media - News broadcasting” (@mmirlb), 20,966 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mmirlb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.