Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

menkent

@mmenkent4

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

166subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003884950546
TypeChannel
Username@mmenkent4
Description@mmenkent у меня +7 к мск щитпост https://t.me/+M_PTqVLbgpgwOGIy
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/mmenkent4

Growth

1668 Aug 2026, 07:45 — 166 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:47 — 166 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:458 Aug 2026, 15:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 165–167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 15:47166no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:45166first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
92.2%
avg views ÷ 166 subscribers
Avg views / post
153
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held18 (22 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total2,756
Reactions total339
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
329
Videos
1
Links
27

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

339 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24873.2%
🏆257.37%
🔥195.60%
👀113.24%
💯113.24%
😎92.65%
🤗72.06%
👾51.47%
🆒30.885%
😁10.295%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 339reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC40 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

13🤗3

8 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC57 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

очен хочу пробные брелочки сделать думаю пока что

18

8 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC51 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @krisellebelieverPhoto

пока я работаю над другим рисунком, делюсь быстрой картинкой с крисэллями вдохновленной альбомом уиллирода я как обложку увидела сразу подумала о них

4

8 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC68 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

ваше мнение про краймфак (бутч/стивен) очень важно ну вообще неочень но проголосуйте

  1. 👍👍супер53%
  2. норм/нейтрально50%
  3. ненравится очень8%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1

8 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC101 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

редрав картинки с марта 2025??? вроде бы #рв

22🔥5🆒3👀1👾1

8 Aug 2026, 01:54 UTC93 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mmenkent4adoptsPhoto

#антро #другое ота с ОГРОМНЫМ приором на рубли, фикс выкуп 700 р отдельно и 1200 вместе также могу взять один слот на подобный кастом тоже за 700 (либо дешевле но без правок)

7😁1

7 Aug 2026, 01:11 UTC114 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

седня буду начинать отрисовывать долги уже а пока что вот вам картинка с финансье потому что Все Мы будем за нее голосовать на мисс хлебоземье🤗🤗 #печеньки

22🔥4🤗4

6 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC119 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

не удержалась #мьюжирникс #данмеши

🏆1610💯7

6 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC115 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

у меня настолько промыт мозг мьюджениксом что Буквально каждый раз когда я интересуюсь каким то новым медиа моя первая мысль это "надо нарисовать их как мьюдженикс котиков"

18😎5👾4

6 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC111 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я СКОРО ОТВЕЧУ ВСЕМ В ЛИЧКУ СОРИ меня убивают дедлайны я нихуя не успеваю а мне еще с колледжем разбираться Постараюсь сегодня вечером или завтра утром ответить🙏🙏 держите пока приветку в аск(ссылку не дам пока что) и реф который я рисовала чтоб спросить у самого главного бутчфана как мне его рисовать #мьюжирникс

26🏆1🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC209 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Итоги!! Победители : @Dice_d6, @Hitman_0riG, @DustFern003 Прошу всех ткнуться в комментарии или личку за призом в течении 4 дней, в ином случае приз аннулируется либо я выберу другого победителя

18🔥2🏆1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mmenkent4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTCAnonymous Poll38 voters

ваше мнение про краймфак (бутч/стивен) очень важно ну вообще неочень но проголосуйте

  1. 👍👍супер53%
  2. норм/нейтрально50%
  3. ненравится очень8%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 200,873 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“menkent” (@mmenkent4), 166 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mmenkent4.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.