Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Маршрут мечты

@mmarshrut

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,571subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003476362703
TypeChannel
Username@mmarshrut
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mmarshrut

Growth

2,5592,5712,5658 August 2026 — 2,559 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,559 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,571 subscribers8 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,557–2,573 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:132,571+12
9 Aug 2026, 12:512,559no change
8 Aug 2026, 16:472,559first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.6%
avg views ÷ 2,571 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,660
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (25 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total31,550
Reactions total1,182
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,182 reactions across 19 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
33228.1%
❤‍🔥32727.7%
🔥15112.8%
🤯716.01%
💘635.33%
💋473.98%
🥰423.55%
🏆403.38%
🆒221.86%
191.61%
🤝121.02%
🎉110.931%
🗿100.846%
😎90.761%
👨‍💻70.592%
🤩70.592%
👍50.423%
💯20.169%
😍20.169%
10.085%
2 further kinds20.169%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,182reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC≈1,030 views80 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Участники начали получать письма о проведении полуфинала в Томске с 17 по 21 августа Поздравляем полуфиналистов и ждем официальные проходные баллы 📎

40❤‍🔥21💋13🔥6

6 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC≈1,120 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Проходной балл для победителя – 449 😁

19🔥7🎉6❤‍🔥3🏆2💋1

6 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC≈1,090 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026

5-7 классы, можете ознакомиться со своими баллами за финал в личных кабинетах ✔️

❤‍🔥178🔥8🎉4💋3🤝2😎1

4 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC≈1,550 views91 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

финал для 5-7 классов завершен, а значит пора подвести итоги этого сезона (не только ваши, но и наши!). мы гордимся вами. вы держались достойно! на вашу стойкость не повлияли переносы дедлайнов, перенос места проведения финала и другие обстоятельства – вы просто приехали, зажгли Красноярск и забрали свои таблички победителей ⭐️ «Маршрут мечты» тоже показал достойные результаты. мы ярко залетели в этот сезон: разбир

❤‍🔥3422🥰18🔥7🤩4👍2💯2😍2

3 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC≈2,010 views108 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

😅Владимир Владимирович Путин на финале 5-7 классов и международного трека в Красноярске 😏 Масштаб удивляет

49❤‍🔥32💘15😎6🤩3💋1🔥1🗿1

3 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC≈1,630 views92 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ОФИЦИАЛЬНЫЙ список с местами проведения и датами полуфиналов 📄

🏆31❤‍🔥2612🔥12🤝53💋3

2 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC≈1,690 views75 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Предварительный список с местами проведения полуфиналов! 📄 🟢г. Томск, 17-21 августа 🟢г. Пермь, 18-22 августа 🟢г. Псков, 22-25 августа 🟢г. Казань, 7-10 сентября 🟢г. Саранск, 10-16 сентября 🟢г. Иваново, 1-4 сентября 🟢г. Тверь, 10-14 сентября 🟢г. Владивосток, ВДЦ «Океан», 2 смены: 31 августа - 9 сентября и 11-20 сентября 🟢г. Анапа, ВДЦ «Смена», 31 августа - 6 сентября 🟢Ленинградская обл., ДООЛ «Россонь», 5-8 сентября.

❤‍🔥3720🆒8💘4🔥31💋1🥰1

1 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC≈1,510 views77 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👆Вот такие сообщения приходят на почту участникам 5-7 классов Ребятам сообщают, что они прошли в финал, который будет проходить в Красноярске с 5 по 10 августа. Это ложная информация ‼️ Финал для 5-7 классов проходит прямо сейчас и никаких новых дат не предусмотрено. Проявляйте критическое мышление, не ведитесь на фейки и будьте осторожнее

🤯3427💋9👨‍💻4💘1🔥1🫡1

31 Jul 2026, 06:47 UTC≈1,280 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @projectgostFile

!!! ТАБЛИЦА С ТИПАМИ КЕЙСОВ 📄📄 Видели? На сайте БП появилась официальная таблица с типами всех кейсов. Теперь можно не сомневаться, думая к какому типу относится ваш кейс. Просто смотрите его тут и всё 🫡 Это поможет вам понять, какой максимум баллов есть за каждый раздел вашего кейса. Сохраняем!

18🔥11❤‍🔥7💘3🎉1💋1🥰1

30 Jul 2026, 08:57 UTC≈2,280 views71 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Итог: в личных кабинетах у участников выставлены баллы за «Твори добро» и «Ответь на вызов» (волонтерство + кейс). На эти задания уже можно писать апелляцию. Баллы за этап «Представь себя» ещё не выставлены.

29🤯17🆒12❤‍🔥5🤝32💋1🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,550 views50 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Информация от организаторов

🔥24❤‍🔥12🏆73👨‍💻2💋1🆒1

30 Jul 2026, 07:47 UTC≈1,530 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Баллы за этап «Знакомство» снова появляются в личных кабинетах. 📎 У кого-то нет баллов за эссе и визитку, но вернулись баллы за кейсы. Баллы подгружаются постепенно.

❤‍🔥24💘1185🥰21💋1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @mmarshrut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 696,847 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Маршрут мечты” (@mmarshrut), 2,571 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mmarshrut.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.